View more on these topics

Why the FCA should scrap unlisted companies from open-ended funds

When was the last time a UK open-ended fund used Guernsey stock exchange listings to avoid UK regulations?

Arch Cru springs to mind- its holdings of Guernsey cell companies enabled it to include a raft of highly illiquid assets in its, supposedly secure, UK-authorised funds. Arch Cru collapsed in 2009 and UK investors lost over £140m.

In March Woodford transferred £73 million of unquoted stocks from his Woodford Equity Income fund to his Woodford Patient Capital investment trust. Before that point the level of unquoted stocks in the fund was up to 18 per cent but did not technically breach the FCA’s 10 per cent limit because of the proportion which had committed to float imminently.

The FCA was well aware of the role the Guernsey cells played in the Arch Cru debacle. And plenty of evidence came out during the Arch Cru case that the Guernsey listings were largely a fiction.

Visit the Money Marketing DFM Centre for the latest outsourced investment research, analysis and thought leadership

No dealings in the Arch Cru cells other than by the Arch Cru managers ever took place. The listings provided no liquidity. They were nothing more than a successful attempt to dodge the intended effect of UK regulations. The Channel Islands Stock Exchange itself was fined for its role in the debacle.

You would imagine that regulators with access to all those Arch Cru files would not need reminding about the complete absence of liquidity for most Guernsey share listings. And the intent of the 10 per cent limit on unquoted companies for open-ended funds is also clear. So Woodford is now effectively thumbing his nose at the FCA.

If the FCA lets Woodford get away with his manoeuvre, it opens the door to other managers seeking to circumvent the 10 per cent rule.

Woodford’s shuffling of his holdings to beat the rules is hideously reminiscent of Jim Slater’s behaviour with the Britannia unit trusts in the early 1970s. Britannia became notorious as the ‘dustbin’ for stakes the financier was unable to deal on at a profit. Those misdeeds were one of the prompts for tighter regulation of unit trusts in the mid-1970s from which investors have benefited.

However talented a fund manager is, the rules are there for the purpose of protecting investors. Woodford’s strategy has blown up, and the regulator should intervene and impose a solution rather than let Woodford play fast and loose with the rules.

Woodford cuts unquoted holdings in flagship fund

In my opinion, the 10 per cent limit on unlisted companies is a mistake. Open-ended funds should not be permitted to hold any unlisted investments. The valuation of such investments always includes a subjective element, even when there has been a recent fund-raising.

The kind of liquidations Woodford has had to make as his fund has suffered huge redemptions create situations in which there is a clear risk that some investors in a fund will win and others lose. This is a result of causing the unlisted investments to form a rising percentage of the fund’s portfolio. Good regulation should prevent such risks arising in the first place.

The FCA has a dismal record in regulating open-ended funds.  If it rolls over on this issue, its credibility as a fund regulator will be well and truly shot.

Chris Gilchrist is director of Fiveways Financial Planning

Recommended

2

How to become a financial adviser: diplomas, degrees and workplaces

Information on how to become a financial adviser is sparse. Money Marketing speaks to advisers about what the requirements really are and how best to meet them. Speaking to financial advisers and planners today, each will have a unique and varied story about how they entered the profession. There are more than a handful of pathways […]

Stop the cold-calling

Royal London is pleased to support the petition calling for a ban on cold-calling for pension and investment products. The petition, launched by IFA Darren Cooke of Red Circle Financial Planning and hosted on the Parliamentary website, calls on the Government to ban cold-calling for pensions and investment products. A similar ban is already in force […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Perfectly argued, Mr Gilchrist.

    Simple: if redemptions are met from funds’ internal resources then no illiquids.

    The fine detail that needs to be worked out is – what is “illiquid”? Plenty of AIM stocks are hardly liquid. Take Craven House, picking one at random. There are barely half a dozen trades a month, with a value of $5K a pop. Not really a liquid stock by anyone’s definition.

    • chris gilchrist 10th April 2019 at 2:59 pm

      The fund manager and ACD or Trustee are jointly responsible for ensuring that redemptions can be managed without disadvantaging investors. If investors suffer losses as a result of them failing in that duty, the investors would potentially have a valid claim against the ACD/Trustee. My impression is that ACD/Trustees don’t take these reponsibilities as seriously as they should, nor will they until and unless the regulator forces them to do so.

      • And you only have to look at the highlighted case of Arch Cru to see this lack of enforcement by the FSA (as then was) of the responsibilities of ACDs. A more perverse or farcical situation you could not find where our wonderful regulators decided it was far easier to get thousands of IFA firms to pick up the tab rather than an ACD that had a FTSE-100 company as a parent!

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com