View more on these topics

Why should we pay for the FSCS TV advertising?

I know we all have to pay towards those who have unfortunately lost money either by poor advice or fraud or other failures which consumers should not have been subject to, which is why the Financial Services Compensation Scheme was set up but should we be paying £3.5m for marketing cost of the FSCS and TV advertisements?

I have to ask and don’t know what others’ opinion is on this but if we are compensating consumers via the levies we pay for the FSCS, should we really be paying to market such a service? Surely this is a Government responsibility and not down to IFAs and others or are we excluded from paying towards this marketing cost?

Michael Fallas
Focus, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire



Eviction notice

The total number of repossessions has remained low throughout the financial crisis and the numbers have been falling over the last 12 months. Recent figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders show repossessions for the whole of 2010 were 24 per cent lower than in 2009. A total of 36,300 homes were repossessed last year, […]


Gartmore sees £7.2bn of outflows in 2010

Gartmore has been hit with a £2.1m interim FSCS interim levy bill after announcing £7.2bn of net new business outflows in 2010. A difficult year for the asset manager, which is set to be acquired by Henderson, has seen Gartmore’s assets under management fall from £22.2bn to £17.2bn while net revenue fell from £223.7m to […]


Protests hit Barclays as it admits paying just £113m corporation tax

Anti-tax avoidance campaigners protested outside 50 Barclays branches at the weekend after the bank admitted it paid just 1 per cent of 2009 profits in UK corporation tax. Action group UK Uncut organised the protests after Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond revealed the bank paid £113m in UK corporation tax in 2009 on a group […]

Generation next

Reaching out to younger clients, says Marilyn Cole, managing partner at space01, would boost the financial services industry and benefit society as a whole


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Equally to the point, why should we have to pay £50m (a staggering sum) for the FSA to be morphed into the FCA? The FCA is going to be staffed by the same people in the same building (though personally I don’t see why three quarters of them shouldn’t be relocated to a vastly less costly site outside London) and on the same salaries (which are still excessive). How can changing the logo and stationery possibly be going to cost £50m? It sounds like just another example of crazy, cost-no-object, unaccountable FSA profligacy ~ in complete defiance of the Statutory Code of Practice For Regulators.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm