View more on these topics

Who was consulted on RDR?

Regulation

In Money Marketing’s recent article on the FSA’s virtually total disregard for the statutory code of practice for regulators, a spokes-person for the FSA is quoted as saying: “We have consulted widely on the retail distribution review and received considerable input from firms of all sizes, including a large number of small firms. We have taken their views on board.”

Apart from the fact that most people who have responded to this claim have done so with derision, I have to say that I for one am unaware of any firm or individual who claims to have been part of the FSA’s “wide” consultation. Nor does anyone to whom I have spoken even know of any such persons or parties. Just who are these consultees?

Were any of the following asked by the FSA for their input – Alan Lakey, Simon Mansell, Neil Liversidge, Aifa, the heads of any of the networks, any of the product providers or any consumer groups? Or was the consul-tation exercise limited just to firms or individuals who already operate in the HNW corner of the market on a fee-only basis, who seem to regard studying for and sitting exams as a cherishable hobby and who seem to think that everybody else should do likewise?

The FSA claims on its website to be “an open and transparent regulator”. If this is the case, then it should publish a list of all the firms and individuals consulted on the RDR and also publish just what their “considerable input” has been so that everyone can see and consider and indeed debate just who said what.

The FSA website also claims that all new regulatory initiatives are subject to a prior cost-benefit analysis. As I write, a resp-onse is awaited to a freedom of information request for directions on the FSA’s web-site to the results of this costbenefit analysis. That too will be interesting to read.

Julian Stevens
Harvest IFM
Bristol

Recommended

Brokers angry as Rock sets up direct site with ‘advice’

Brokers have hit out at Northern Rock’s decision to launch a new direct-only mortgage website which claims to offer “helpful advice” to borrowers. The nationalised bank, which does between 85 and 90 per cent of its mortgage business through intermediaries, launched the website last week, which it says is “unique to the market,” customer-focused and […]

Head of sales Anders leaves Bupa Income Protection

Bupa Individual Protection head of sales Mark Anders has left the company. Anders, who joined Bupa in March 2007, was responsible for its relationships with intermediary partners. Before joining Bupa, Anders worked at LV= as a sales manager in the intermediary division. Bupa has not yet decided whether it will be recruiting a replacement. Anderswill […]

Pensions - thumbnail

Preparing for the changes to the pensions market

As more and more providers start to reveal their stance on the charge cap and removal of commission and active member discount pricing, we thought it would be worthwhile to look at what these are, and the steps businesses should be taking to prepare for this.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Eh? This letter is bizarre.

    Each discussion and consultation paper (there’s been about four) asked questions inviting responses from anyone in the industry. There are two or three feedback statements reporting on responses and the FSA’s response to those. Each time, the appendices have lists of respondents. They could even be requested under FOI requests I’d guess. The RDR papers are all on the FSA’s website.

    One wonders if the letter’s author has read any of the RDR papers.

  2. I was consulted about it but i don’t like to talk about it and they did ask me to keep it a secret

  3. And to answer the question – yes, AIFA and Alan Lakey’s, Simon Mansell’s and Neil Liversedge’s firms are all shown in the respondents list.

  4. As did Adviser Alliance. Two bites at the cherry for some?

  5. This seems to be the only thread Mr Stevens hasn’t contributed to!

Leave a comment