View more on these topics

What providers think of Sandler

BRITANNIC ASSET MANAGEMENT

Means test for free advice

Britannic Asset Management is calling on the Government to provide free financial advice to the public on a means-tested basis in its response to the Sandler review.

It believes controlling pricing structures through Cat-standard Isas and stakeholder is not the way to achieve the Government&#39s aims of improving levels of savings.

BAM says it would be more meaningful for the Government to provide access to free financial advice on a means-tested basis. It believes this is a more effective use of taxpayers&#39 money than initiatives such as baby bonds.

Throughout its response, BAM calls for simplification of regulation and less Government intervention on product design. In particular, it wants to see the Isa regulations simplified.

It says these are the key issues to address if the Government is to meet its aim of increasing consumer understanding of financial products and the value of advice.

BAM believes the clarity of collective investments is not given enough credit in the Sandler review and questions whether the review is impartial, saying “some of the language used is questionable for what is supposed to be an open-minded review”.

Sales and marketing director Francis Ghiloni says: “Britannic is strongly opposed to the introduction of further regulation as the high cost of regulation serves to exclude people on lower incomes from the market.”

NORWICH UNION

IFAs do have the investment knowhow

Norwich Union has come out in defence of IFAs and their levels of investment knowledge.

The review had criticised IFAs level of investment knowledge but NU has gone to some lengths to demonstrate IFAs are fully competent in this area. It suggests to Sandler that IFAs do consider the fundamentals of investment performance rather than just looking at providers and products.

NU makes a strong case that commission levels are evolving without the need for further intervention. It says a wholesale withdrawal of commission would result in a significant reduction in distribution. Overlapping regulation on products and sales processes has dramatically reduced distribution and caused a considerable savings gap, claims the life office.

NU voices strong concerns over further pricing regulation, saying although providing face-value, low-cost products stifle innovation and investment in distribution.

Sales and marketing director Peter Hales says: “We go to some lengths to show there is a margin in commission to fund elements of distribution. We have made a number of suggestions on how to achieve greater transparency on commission. IFAs do have greater investment knowledge than implied by the consultation document.”

SKANDIA

With-profits business is distorted mystery

Skandia has launched a scathing attack on with-profits life offices.

It says life offices with orphan assets distort the marketplace and do not allow for a level playing field with unit-linked funds. It argues that reduction-in-yield figures are artificial and do not represent true costs to consumers.

With-profits investments are popular because of high commission, says Skandia, and companies have been under pressure to drive up business to look attractive in a period of takeovers and mergers.

But it says consumers have a clear preference for paying for advice through commission rather than fees and it does not agree with commission intervention.

Skandia speaks out against the cost of increasing regulation, saying the rules are “confused, conduct is not adequately policed, discussions with FSA staff produce random advice and ultimately a washing of hands”.

It says product design and pricing is best left to the industry and warns there is a danger a small number of large players will dominate the market.

Pensions development manager Brian Newbould says: “With-profits asset allocations are a mystery. There is no one who acts on behalf of existing policyholders about bonuses, returns, expenses or smoothing. There is no evidence to suggest with-profits funds do reduce volatility for investors.”

CIS

Move to unit trust pricing

CIS is calling for an end to high front-end charging on with-profits and a move towards unit trust pricing in its Sandler response.

It also proposes a halt to further regulatory intervention, believing this will drive out advice and lead to greater financial exclusion.

Its main points are:

Concern the review will lead to further restrictions in savings opportunities for ordinary investors.

Any additional regulatory costs or further restrictions on margins will severely limit the ability to tackle social and financial exclusion.

Customers value the reassurance and confidence an intermediary can give.

Fee-based advice will remain in the minority.

With-profits can and should be modernised.

CLERICAL MEDICAL

Don&#39t put a cap on commission

Clerical Medical warns against introducing a commission cap, saying 1 per cent charges are already bringing down commission.

Its main points are:

IFAs do not just provide advice, they act as a distribution channel by encouraging people to save. The review seems only to consider the advice aspect of IFAs

Commission is already reducing because of the introduction of 1 per cent charges and complex contract penalties are also disappearing, meaning the review is addressing yesterday&#39s problems by saying IFAs concentrate only on commission.

Intervention in commission is risky and removing commission completely could put many IFAs out of business, leaving a distribution problem.

STANDARD LIFE

IFAs are a force for public good

Standard Life is calling on Sandler to recognise the importance of IFAs as a force for good to the consumer.

Its main points are:

IFAs are very important in promoting savings and investments and any change must not undermine access and availability to independent advice.

IFAs exist because of consumer demand. Consumers want IFAs and that is why they are the dominant force.

The IFA sector acts to bring efficiencies to the market, stimulating competition between providers meaning customers get better value and driving down costs.

With-profits give people a way into the market with an equity-backed investment with lower volatility.

AEGON

Look at the facts today

Aegon wants the Sandler review team to make sure any changes are based on hard facts, saying IFAs act in the consumers&#39 interest.

It says:

The review should go ahead from where the industry is today and not react to problems which are being improved

The ABI&#39s Raising Standards initiative will address many areas of Sandler&#39s concerns.

IFAs act as a consumer surrogate to get the best deal for clients.

Employers have a vital role to play in financial services, particularly pensions.

Arguments of fees over commission are purely academic. An insistence on fees will further discourage consumers from making provision.

With-profits investments are wanted by many consumers and have encouraged people to save.

SCOTTISH LIFE

Regulation increases exclusion

Scottish Life says in its Sandler submission that unless advice is readily available, regulatory control and quality-marking of products will not ensure effective distribution.

Its main points are:

Product regulation is unnecessary if consumers have access to properly trained advisers, along with adequate product disclosure.

Consumers need encouragement to make adequate provision. This can only be achieved by having sources of advice readily available and accessible to all. Regulation is increasing the exclusion of the less well-off from the long-term savings market.

The influence of corporate purchasers is set to grow and should be encouraged through tax incentives.

With-profits products continue to offer a very strong appeal for long-term savers in all customer segments.

Recommended

FSA will hit the ground running

At the end of November, the FSA will finally get its full authority and the era of the single regulator will arrive. But the new regulator has already been busy, both in terms of preparation and in pursuing a number of projects that have arisen along the way.Perhaps an indication of the ambitious attitude tow-ards […]

Morley tries to concentrate

Morley Fund Management, which is part of CGNU, has introduced its UK focus fund.This open-ended investment company (Oeic) aims to produce capital growth by investing in a concentrated portfolio of between 30 and 40 UK stocks. It is managed by David Lis, who presently runs the Norwich UK growth and UK equity funds.Unlike those funds, […]

BWD Rensburg – BWD Aggressive Growth Trust

Friday, 12 October 2001.Type: Unit trust.Aim: Growth by investing in UK equities.Minimum investment: Lump sum £500, monthly £25.Investment split: 100 per cent UK equities.Isa link: Yes.Pep transfers: Yes.Charges: Initial 5.25 per cent, annual 1.5 per cent.Commission: Initial 3 per cent, renewal 0.5 per cent.Tel: 0800 7316028.

Torquil Clark cautious welcome for comparative tables

Torquil Clark is welcoming the FSA&#39s comparative tables which went live earlier today, but is concerned on the tables&#39 lack of information on past performance and investment risk.Pensions development manager Tom McPhail says: “While we are very pleased to see the FSA taking these steps to educate consumers, we do not believe that the tables […]

Five ways to invest in the connected world

Smart utility metering; fitness trackers; connected cars; smart factories; precision agriculture: the internet of things encompasses myriad applications. But how do you gain exposure – and profit – from this growing trend, asks Neptune fund manager & CTO Ali Unwin. Read more: Important information Investment risks Neptune funds may have a high historic volatility rating […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment