View more on these topics

What advisers are saying: Too much RDR optimism?

“The one area of true value is advice – the rest is just a commodity.”

This is a bold assertion, indeed, from advisers regarding who is likely to feel the heat most across the value chain. With client fees moving south of 2 per cent and the advice fee around 1 per cent, advisers believe that it is fund managers and platforms that will bear the weight of downward pricing pressure.

But how much of this expectation is rooted in something boffins call “optimism bias”? That’s the fancy name for: “Yeah, I know there is risk but it won’t happen to me.”

A lot of research indicates that people underestimate their personal probability of encountering negative events. As Oscar Wilde said: “The basis of optimism is sheer terror.”

Intense competition, outsourcing and the growth of passive strategies are increasing client and adviser price sensitivity and making it harder for fund managers to sustain inter-brand differentiation, for sure.

The days of promising and delivering a 20 per cent return for clients are well and truly over. Now, more than ever, clients are paying for security and trust (“that is how SJP knock out products at 5-6 per cent initial commission” as one adviser put it). As such, advisers believe that advice propositions based on ongoing investment advice are likely to come under further pressure, with only those business models founded on financial planning (with deeply embedded relationships) less vulnerable to price sensitivity.

Views on cost are shaped, in large part, by the increasingly accepted view that it is impossible to find consistently outperforming funds. More advisers have rejected (and are rejecting) the theory that “better advice” is active fund management. Many are coming around to the notion that better advice is “buying the market”.

Yet there is always plenty of opportunity for differentiation even in the most commoditised markets. As the saying goes: “There are no mature products, only mature managers.” Fund manager and platform marketers must (and will) use their imagination.

In the emerging world (according to advisers) there will be serious compression across the value chain. Deep, enduring value is expected although only in the advice fee. Basis points will come down on both tax wrappers and fund management with the momentum towards passive investments likely to continue. There may be some value-adds in alpha but they will be few and far between.

Much of this is true but the rosy picture painted by advisers feels a touch too neat. Back to my point on optimism bias. To quote psychologist David G.Myers: “Success requires enough optimism to provide hope and enough pessimism to prevent complacency.”

Phil Wickenden is the founder of So Here’s The Plan

Phil Wickenden Aug 23

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It’s not optimism its reality as post RDR advisers will be the gatekeepers to products and fund managers and therefore you could call RDR the Tesco moment.

    After all Tesco’s and other supermarkets have successfully pushed down prices of food to the consumer based on being roofless with its supply chain. I suspect larger IFA practices will do the same to the providers over management fees and other associated charges.

    Consumers will see where the actual real cost of providing advice and ongoing service comes from and will have no problems in demanding lower charges from fund managers who so often underperform. The only way that these fund managers will be able to attract new monies into their funds is to lower their charging structures. After all backhanders to advisers are no longer allowed in enhancing commission rates.

    So it’s not over optimism it’s a reality that supply and demand is now going to come into financial services in a big way. If I was a fund manager or product provider I would be scared very scared.

  2. Couldn’t agree more about the supply and demand comment. Bottom line? Clients will/are questioning why they need an IFA. Our surveys of our 1800+ client base, covering all walks of life, have discovered that for a full-blown financial review and recommendations taking 5hrs, the average “person in the street” would be willing to pay……….£47. Not £47 per hour, £47 total. Highest figure £250, lowest £0. The zero being from a multi-millionaire, amongst others, who currently pays over £6000pa in commissions/renewals (he just doesnt’t want to pay fees?!?!)

    There is a storm coming and we are about to be wiped out

  3. absolutely JF, absolutely.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com