View more on these topics

West Brom set for £27m hit after legal defeat

High-Court-Building-700.jpg

West Bromwich Building Society will repay £27.5m to its borrowers after losing a legal battle over buy-to-let tracker rates.

A West Bromwich statement says the payment is likely to mean the lender posts a loss for the year to 2017, but that the firm’s underlying profitablity is good.

A Court of Appeal judgment today found West Bromwich should not have raised its interest rates in 2013 without a rise in Bank of England base rate.

The judgement also found the lender could not call in its mortgages with one month’s notice.

The appeal was brought by landlord group Property 118 and overturns an earlier High Court judgment that sided with West Bromwich.

The West Bromwich statement says: “While we are disappointed, we accept the Court of Appeal’s decision and so will be contacting all affected borrowers, including those who were not part of this action, to advise them of the outcome and that we will be reimbursing them any additional interest charged.

“Other saving or borrowing members do not need to take any action as a result of this news.
The one-off cost of this will be approximately £27.5m.”

West Bromwich chief executive Jonathan Westhoff says: “Naturally we are disappointed by today’s decision from the Court of Appeal. At all times we acted to ensure we were treating customers fairly and that our approach was in the best interests of the society and its members as a whole.

“In line with our prudent approach to managing the society we had already allocated capital to cover this unexpected outcome and so the society remains in a strong financial position.”

The statement says the original rise was permitted in mortgage contract wording and was necessary to reflect market conditions.

It says: “The terms and conditions of these mortgages contain a clause which, under certain circumstances, enables the lender to change the mortgage interest rate to something more in line with the current market norm.

“Savers, who represent the vast majority of the society’s members, have suffered a dramatic fall in income due to lower interest rates.

“The board of the society therefore acted in accordance with its overarching duties to treat customers fairly and to act in the best interests of members as a whole, savers as well as borrowers.

“After careful consideration and in response to the unprecedented reduction in interest rates over recent years and the increased relative cost in providing these loans, the society could not, in order to protect the best interests of members, ignore this clause.”

Property 118 founder Mark Smith says he is “elated” at the court’s decision.

He says: “This ruling sends a clear message to other lenders who have acted in a similar manner, and to those who might have been considering following suit.

“There are thought to be in the region of one million tracker buy-to-let mortgages which could have been affected if this case had gone the wrong way.

“I am extremely grateful to all of the Property118 Action Group members who didn’t lose faith in our quest for justice. My win will now be automatically applied to them due to the fact they were represented by my case. It remains to be seen as to whether West Brom will apply the ruling to borrowers who were not represented by my case.”

Recommended

Sajid Javid
1

Govt could introduce 7-day mortgage switching

Borrowers could be allowed to switch their mortgages in seven days, under new plans being consulted on by the Government. It has called for evidence to find out how long it takes people to switch providers across a number of markets, including mortgages. The Government will meet with industry bodies to discuss the plan, which […]

UK-Houses-Home-House-Property-Mortgage-700x450.jpg
2

Brokers hit back at FCA claims over mortgage prisoners

Brokers have hit out at the FCA’s claim the Mortgage Market Review has not created “mortgage prisoners” locked out of certain parts of the market. Earlier this week the regulator published two papers on whether the mortgage market was working effectively. The first was the findings of its responsible lending review post-MMR, while the second was […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Excellent news. Can we now move on to the next item being mortgage prisoners and the exploitation suffered thereto.

  2. 2 things strike me about the West Brom’s statement: firstly they seem to be saying that because savers have been disadvantaged by Government and BoE policy decisions, it is ok for them to disadvantage borrowers in order to try and redress the balance; and secondly I don’t seem to have noticed West Brom at the top of the leader boards for savings rates due to the additional 2% they have been paying to savers since December 2013!
    I must have been looking at the wrong tables!!!

  3. Hopefully someone will now take Skipton to task for raising their svr from 3.5% to 4.95% in 2010, Skipton said they would review it at a later date when market conditions improved; which they did not.

    Skipton Total Group Profit Before Tax amounted to £146.9m in 2015 (2014: £180.6m)

  4. Michael zaman 9th June 2016 at 6:53 am

    I would like to know mark smith contact details and the law firm that acted for mark as I was effected in a similar manner by another lender and would like to review this case.
    Can anybody help ?
    Thank you
    Michael

Leave a comment