View more on these topics

Weighty issues

This year, for the first time in the UK, a single company came to account


for more than 10 per cent of the stockmarket index. This may seem like a


technical factor, which it is, and irrelevant to the advisory market, which


it isn&#39t.


This issue, if unchecked, will have a broader effect on the retail


investment market.


Vodaphone Mannesman now accounts for more than 10 per cent of the FTSE 100


index. Authorised unit trusts are not permitted to hold more than 10 per


cent of a portfolio in any one stock, so the conclusion is that UK equity


funds will be forced to be underweight in Vodaphone Mannesman.


Clients who invest in a UK equity fund have the right to expect the fund


manager to select from the broad universe of shares and use their skill and


judgement to decide whether to be overweight or underweight in order to


deliver excess returns. But clients will not now have this expectation.


There is a more serious issue. FSA guidance following the Vodaphone


Mannesman deal indicates that index funds can breach the 10 per cent limit


if their fund objectives allow. Alternatively, index funds can use a


synthetic proxy. This is an asset which, while not a Vodaphone Mannesman


share, mimics the performance of this share.


Technically, because the Vodaphone Mannesman share and the synthetic


instrument are different assets, they are not aggregated and, therefore, do


not breach the 10 per cent limit. But the net effect is that the portfolio


has more than 10 per cent exposure to a single company.


In addition to this, Europe is developing legislation to allow index funds


to hold up to 35 per cent in one asset to cater for more concentrated


equity markets within the EU.


Autif and the data providers have long taken the view that products should


be segmented to meet the needs of clients and their advisers rather than


based on arcane technical detail. Consequently, UK actively managed and


index funds have been grouped together since they seek to deliver the same


basic proposition to investors but simply choose different routes to


achieve that objective.


However, if technical factors undermine this principle, the common


classification must be seriously challenged.


An additional side effect of this structural difference is that active


managers, who are already and, quite rightly, facing fierce competition


from index funds, will find this position exacerbated. In essence, active


funds rely on being able to convince investors that it is worth paying a


premium for excess returns. This premium not only justifies the costs of


fund management and research but also justifies the advice needed to select


a higher quality fund.


Now imagine an environment where the biggest stocks significantly


outperform their smaller peers. Index funds which hold these stocks will


outperform their active rivals. The current position, where index funds


claim that 80 per cent of active managers underperform the index, will


reach the point where potentially 100 per cent will fail this test. Combine


this message with the clear price advantage of index funds and the


situation begins to look decidedly sticky.


A defence may be to use the new range of capped indices. The debate with


capped indices is whether the biggest stocks are capped at 10 per cent to


comply with the rule or actually to cap the index at a figure below 10 per


cent. The 10 per cent limit clearly aligns the capped index with the capped


rule and allows a more consistent base for arguing the issue with


regulators to seek to create a level playing field.


The downside to this route is that a fund manager will only ever be able


to be in line or underweight. The argument in favour of producing a capped


index at a figure below 10 per cent is that if, for example, the index is


capped at 8 per cent, this still allows active managers to go “overweight”


and, therefore, potentially out-perform the index.


Another option is to try to explain this structural imbalance to advisers,


investors and journalists to drive for change. This could be done in


association with using the capped indices as benchmarks for active UK


equity funds in the meantime.


My concern is that this plays to the index funds as well. The industry has


long sought to explain its apparent failings to investors with excessively


technical language. If active funds underperform passive funds due to this


structural imbalance, then protestations of unfair play in the wider market


will have a hollow ring as active funds are seen to try to explain higher


fees with jargon.


The argument here is not about active versus passive. The model of using


an index core with active satellites for constructing an investor&#39s


portfolio is very powerful. The argument is simply for a level playing


field to prevent anti-compet itive markets and to simplify choice for


customers.

Recommended

Pearl of the PIA quits for dotcom

The voice of the PIA, Sarah Modlock, is leaving to join newly floatedfinancial dotcom company Interactive Investor. Modlock, 28, will be thefeatures and consumers editor of iii, which aims to become an onlineone-stop financial services shop and has nearly a million users. She willbe taken off any sensitive or firm-specific work between now and herdeparture.She […]

CML warns on equity-release perils

The Council of Mortgage Lenders has done a U-turn on equity-releasemortgages and is now warning the mortgage industry on the possible dangers.The move flies in the face of previous CML optimism about the products andthe eagerness of lenders to see further product and market innovation.CML senior economist Fionnuala Earley says large amounts of equitywithdrawal should […]

Nice guys, shame about the fund

I am bemused by all the reports appearing of late about the FSA wanting totake past performance out of the equation when an adviser is trying toformulate a recommendation to an investment product.The question yet to be answered by anybody, as far as I am aware, is justwhat does the omniscient FSA suggest we use […]

Flying Scots funds gathering steam

Scotland&#39s fund management industry is increasing by the minute and it isnow one of the biggest centres in Europe. Which investment houses do yourate and why?MD: Britannic have been my long-term favourites. They have an excellenttrack record across a range of funds. A genuine team approach seems to havepaid dividends for them. The other two […]

Auto enrolment – so far so good?

Jamie Clark – Business Development Manager The recent report from the Pensions Policy Institute demonstrates the sheer scale of auto-enrolment so far and what we can expect in the future. We’ve pulled out the key information to save you reading the full report. Auto enrolment in numbers Sources: Pensions Policy Institute, The Future Book: Unravelling […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment