View more on these topics

We need a review of misregulation

It seems that the Financial Ombudsman Service continues to fine advisers for shortfalls that are caused by regulatory-imposed projections, that is, that were imposed on the adviser and the provider by the regulator.

The FSA may not now be continuing with this Lautro practice but the FOS still perpetuates this injustice.

An example is the FOS decision tree No 25. This decision tree has been removed from your website but not its use. Can you confirm that the FOS would take account of the Lautro factor when considering endowment shortfalls and will review those fines already imposed which have not?

Your website says the following:


  • We’re completely independent and impartial – just as a judge would be if the consumer went to court instead.
  • We are not a regulator (“watchdog”) or a trade body or a consumer champion.
  • Our role is to settle disputes, without taking sides, so when we look at a complaint, we give both sides a fair hearing.


At what level of misselling would the “completely independent and impartial” FOS consider it appropriate to act? Would miselling estimated at up to £200m be sufficient? Would the FOS “without taking sides” investigate misregulation and accept responsibility for its part in this injustice and stop the existing and future persecution of advisers?

This should not be a problem, if ,as you say, you “give both sides a fair hearing” and one assumes that if you were found to be at fault the FOS would fully accept responsibility and apply an appropriate remedy for all those that have been wronged and those that continue to be wronged.

I would like to call on you to instigate a misregulation review. There are many cases where your organisation has found against advisers for an endowment shortfall where the illustration layout with its projected return was dictated by the regulator, Lautro, not the financial adviser or the IFA. I understand this matter has been brought to your notice by many advisers over recent years but ignored.

Simon Mansell

Temple Bar IFA, Worcester

Recommended

FSA trouble-shooter Knight joins law firm Bevan Brittan

FSA legal adviser and trouble-shooter Harvey Knight has left the regulator to head up the financial services arm of law firm Bevan Brittan LLP.Knight advised the FSA in its dealings with the recent Parliamentary Ombudsman inquires into who was responsible for the collapse of Equitable Life and dealt with litigation, judicial reviews, complaints and Freedom […]

Morrisons stacks up for MacIver

Prudential has lost three key members of its executive team over the past few weeks with insurance business director Angus MacIver the latest to announce his departure.Director of intermediated distribution Dave Harris left last month for personal reasons and intermediaries director Tudor Taylor is due to leave in October to pursue other opportunities.MacIver, who was […]

Creating opportunity out of change

By Denise Wond, marketing manager The buy-to-let market has recently been the subject of a raft of tax changes, all of which make it a less profitable and less appealing proposition for investors. In response, we’ve seen a dip in demand for BTL mortgages and that’s bad news for many advisers who will now be looking […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment