Anyone who ends up in receipt of means-tested handouts in retirement will see the value of their pension savings reduced by at least 40 per cent and in some cases could even lose the whole value of their pension savings altogether.
Let me put that another way. While saving in a private pension could mean that someone’s pension would increase, for some people, overall income may not because of the interaction with income-related benefits such as pension credit, housing and council tax benefit.
They are not my words, by the way, I have sort of borrowed them from something that was said in Parliament a few weeks ago in reply to a question on the expected take-up of additional class three National Insurance contributions. It is something that caused a bit of a stir at the time among my fellow pension Twitterers (www.Twitter.com/ PensionsGuru, as you ask). You will find the words if you look carefully in this short excerpt from Hansard:
Steve Webb: “To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 25 November 2008, official report, column 1384W, on National Insurance contributions, for what reason the estimates assume a 20 per cent take-up rate; and if he will make a statement.”
Ms Rosie Winterton: “National Insurance contribution data was used to show which people had eligible blank years on their record since 1975.
“We found that around half a million individuals reaching state pension age between 2008 and 2015 could increase their entitlement to basic state pension by buying deficient years from earlier in their working lives. While basic state pension entitlement could increase, for some people, overall income may not because of the interaction with income-related benefits such as pension credit, housing benefit and council tax benefit.
“Taking these factors into account, along with evidence from a previous class three related exercise, our estimates assume a 20 per cent take-up.”
Just to make sure we all understand, the Government is not expecting many people to take up paying additional class three contributions, even though their records show that half a million people could increase their basic state pension by doing so.
That is because, even though their pensions would increase, they would not be one penny better off as a result. So the expectation of the number who will take up the offer of paying more to increase their pensions is relatively low.
I can understand that. What I cannot understand, though, is why there are not similarly low expectations of the number of people who will take up voluntary pension saving after 2012 once the new pension laws kick in.
Steve Bee is head of pensions strategy at Scottish Life