View more on these topics

Watchdog&#39s view is critical

The Financial Services Ombudsman is reckoned to be looking warily at the trend towards reviewable premiums on critical-illness policies, with some product providers saying that the watchdog has indicated that such contracts may fall foul of unfair contract principles.

It has indicated its concerns that policyholders may not understand the premiums they are being quoted at time of purchase are only valid for the first five years or however long the initial term lasts.

This is a worrying development as the market is tilting heavily towards reviewable premiums.

Advisers are already impatient with the pace of development of the next generation of products following the sharp increases in price or withdrawal of many non-reviewable CI policies.

The ombudsman&#39s concerns could be another spanner in the works and lead to more delays.

Of course, the ombudsman is correct to warn about future problems in the run-up to regulation. It is also important that providers do not design what could be construed as unfair contracts.

Given that many product providers view guaranteed premiums as simply too expensive to continue offering, the fact that their main alternative is being viewed negatively by the FOS must be cause for concern. But it is difficult to see an alternative product that providers can afford and that meets the public&#39s need for cover.

The answer surely must be to make sure the terms of such contracts are crystal clear at the outset.

The ombudsman may be hoping to nudge the market away from practices it believes fall foul of its rules. But there is an urgent need for an open debate and for providers to give a lead so the needs of the public can be met.


Millfield cuts loss by 4.5 per cent

National IFA Millfield Group&#39s losses have fallen 4.5 per cent to £5.6m in the six months to September 2003, from £5.9m for the same period last year. The Aim-listed firm saw turnover for the period increase 65 per cent to £23.5m for the six months to September 2003, from £14.2m for the same period in […]

Life after depolarisation Zurich: 10-year multi-ties with initial cash and buyouts

Zurich Advice Network is understood to be offering IFAs a 10-year deal with an initial cash payment and buyouts of up to five times annual earnings as part of its multi-tie plans. Money Marketing believes the provider intends to have part of its business remain IFA and the rest tied in a process it has […]

Replacement business costs St James&#39s Place £250k fine

St James&#39s Place has been fined £250,000 by the FSA for serious breaches of monitoring and record-keeping requirements relating to replacement business. The action refers to recommendations to customers made by the firms&#39 appointed representatives to surrender and replace existing investment contracts arranged by competing providers, a process referred to as a replacement sale. The […]

Heated over cold-calling ban

I see that the FSA is going to ban cold-calling in respect of mortgage marketing. Frankly, that is like telling the building industry that they are no longer allowed to mix concrete. The FSA says that “this follows in line with EU regulations, etc”. Do you know what I intend to do in relation to […]

FAMR – a familiar response

Pension specialist Fiona Tait takes a look at the Financial Advice Market Review and assesses the three areas where it suggests improvements can be made With significant budget changes ruled out (for a while anyway), the pension community briefly turned its attention to the FCA’s final report on its Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR), hoping […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment