View more on these topics

Watch out for the CT scan

HMRC is taking a keen interest in corporation tax returns relating to arrangements for employee benefit trusts

You cannot have failed to notice that we are living through (and are likely to continue to live through for some time to come) a period of (relative) tax austerity – in other words, tax increases. This makes the return on the time and effort spent on reducing tax potentially greater than it has been when the tax burden was lower. So, a potentially attractive return on intellectual capital expended is in the offing.

But with that dynamic at play, the corollary is that HM Revenue & Customs is upping its game to ensure that tax leakage is not such as to put a hole in their ambitious plans for increasing the tax yield.

It is a bit like the defences of the Premiership and Champions league (Rafa’s Inter excepted, of course) doing all they possibly can to stop the seemingly inexorable damage waiting to be caused by the power and unstoppable force that is Gareth Bale who, according to many sports writers, is the best or, at least, second-best player in the world and hottest property in football right now.

OK…right…so where were we? Oh yes, taxation.

So, where have we seen tax increases? Well, definitely in relation to income tax and National Insurance, and seeing that these are the fiscal impositions that most directly and regularly affect the biggest segment of UK taxpayers, it is where we also see a fair bit of interest in methods of reduction and avoidance. In relation to employee benefits (and in this category I include owner/managers of SMEs) a biggish game in town is employee benefit trusts (EBTs) and employer-financed retirement benefits schemes (EFRBS). However, HMRC also has a ticket to this game and has recently made its position a little clearer with its statement (in connection with the recent pension tax changes) that it would be looking to make EFRBS (and, presumably, all trust-based employee benefit arrangements) less attractive than other forms of remuneration.

Add to this the generally well publicised HMRC crackdown on tax avoidance and the future for these arrangements does not look as rosy as Gareth’s.

As a result, it would perhaps be unsurprising if promoters of employee benefit schemes, which seek to avoid or defer tax and National Insurance liabilities, and, in particular, trust-based employee benefit schemes, such as EFRBS and EBTs, were somewhat concerned.

The HMRC onslaught on schemes of this sort started with “Spotlight on EBTs” about a year ago, followed by a Budget note issued in Alastair Darling’s Budget in March this tear and the first Budget of the Con-Lib coalition Government in June.

The two tax planning strategies that seem to be under particular HMRC spotlight are the use of trusts to reward employees and the geared growth and employee-related securities.

As stated above, the latest announcements in relation to the tax treatment of pension arrangements make it clear that EFRBS, as well as EBTs and FBTs, will be targeted by the proposed anti-avoidance legislation from April 2011.

We are, of course, still waiting to see the shape of the proposed legislation. However, in addition to the above, there is anecdotal evidence from practitioners (for example, on one of the forums frequented by trust practitioners) that HMRC inspectors are already taking an aggressive stance towards these schemes.

Typically, there are reports of HMRC challenges via a corporation tax inspector raising an enquiry into the CT return.

In some instances, the attacks are directed towards arrangements seeking a CT deduction from outset but there have been reports of challenges even where that is not the case, that is, no deduction is being claimed.

For example, there have been reports of instances of CT inspectors raising questions about PAYE and NIC liabilities on any allocations of the fund in respect of particular beneficiaries of an EBT.

One reported case concerned a bona fide employee benefit trust run by a reputable FTSE100 company, although, in that case, HMRC was persuaded to back down. However, it illustrates the more aggressive attitude on behalf of HMRC.

Readers will remember that in the case of Sempra Metals Ltd v Commissioners of HMRC 2008, HMRC succeeded in preventing a CT deduction for payments to a family benefit trust but failed in their argument that loans to beneficiaries were subject to PAYE and NICs (albeit there is a charge linked to the interest not paid).

EBTs, FBTs and EFRBS have offered genuine and often very effective tax planning opportunities for a long time but it is clear that the Government is determined to stop the schemes that, in their view, abuse the tax system.

Tax avoidance is certainly not illegal but it is clearly not something that the Government is happy with, especially in these difficult economic times.


Succession adds trio of adviser firms

Succession Advisory Services has acquired three more adviser firms bringing its total assets under management over £5.5bn. WestPoint Financial Consultants, Prosser Knowles Associates and Jacobs Financial Group have joined the consolidator adding over 50 advisers and £0.5bn of assets. The additions mean Succession now has more than 30 advisers firms since its launch in 2009. […]

Will the currency wars have long-term side FX?

The raging global currency war has created uncertainty about investment opportunities and about which areas will be hurt the most. Are there geographical areas that are best to avoid amid this currency volatility and areas advisers are favouring and avoiding as a result? And then there are the obvious knock-on implications for other asset classes, […]


Broker barriers are removed

Mortgage advisers will have to make it explicitly clear if they do not advise on direct-only deals but will not be forced to offer a fee option or advise on direct deals to retain independence. The FSA this week published a mortgage market review consultation paper setting out a number of changes to the mortgage […]


Sesame Bankhall launches investment platform with Axa Elevate

Sesame Bankhall Group has launched an investment platform in conjunction with Axa Elevate. Axa Elevate will power Sesame One, which is part of a wider initiative that will offer support and training on using the platform, as well as help for Sesame members preparing for the RDR. The platform proposition was launched at the network’s […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. 2nd December 2010 at 11:31 am

    Also in last weeks Money Marketing there is an article by Tony Wickenen on the widespread use of EFURBS by football clubs as a way of rewarding their key players. He concludes.. “The EFRBS / EBT option remains a current possibility but given the relative strength of negative HMRC sentiment against these plans, it could not be ruled out that the (seemingly inevitable) provisions to severely limit their attractions would not apply in some way to schemes effected in advance of the implementation of any such new provisions”.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm