View more on these topics

Verity&#39S VIEW

Around a fortnight ago, the new chairman of the National Association of Pension Funds, Peter Thompson, grabbed the national media&#39s attention by warning of a bleak future for company pension schemes.

The Daily Mail&#39s headline, Company pensions run out of cash, was exaggerated, to put it mildly. But the story stood.

Long-term factors such as lower long-term interest rates and longer lifespans are already putting a strain on pension funds because they make it much more expensive to pay a pension from retirement to death.

The subtext was that short-term factors – such as a dep-ressed stockmarket and the withdrawal of tax credits on dividends – have turned that strain into a squeeze.

No doubt, BT, which is shutting its final-salary pension to new members, would agree. The country&#39s biggest pension fund has known for years that its members are living longer.

It has also used the surplus on its pension fund indirectly to fund voluntary early retirements (some would call them redundancies).

But most of all, BT&#39s fund has suffered just like any other scheme from one crucial factor – lower inflation.

Company pensions have this in common with endowments – inflation made both of them easier to sell. While final-salary schemes have been around for decades, their sales really took off in the 1980s, just like endowments. The basic arithmetical principle was similar. So long as inflation was high, then, all else being equal, interest rates and investment returns (ultimately the same thing) would also be high. As indeed they had been.

With the stockmarket roaring away, it seemed only to require a modest expectation of investment returns to meet a certain target. For endowments, this target was the value of the mortgage. For final-salary schemes, enough assets to pay the benefits.

What made them both so easy to sell was that if you were not quite so modest in your expectations – in fact, if you merely projected forward from what had gone before – than you would end up with a massive surplus. And what the legendary “nest-egg” was to endowment holders, the “surplus” was to employers with final-salary schemes.

A great incentive. While the endowment holder plan-ned an extension to his house on maturity, the employer could look forward to a contribution holiday under which he would offer his staff a benefit that was costing him precisely nothing. And the pension surplus could even, perhaps, be used for other purposes…

But that incentive relied on a certain amount of inflation – a lot more than we have at present. Perhaps in the 1980s no one expected politicians and central bankers to succeed in their aim of killing inflation.

But, through determination and a willingness to sacrifice numerous jobs and livelihoods to that end, it does seem right now as if they have. Of course, inflation might take off again in the coming years. But suppose it does not?

And here is where it gets really frightening. I&#39ve got one of the actuarial profession&#39s most senior figures to thank for this particular little nightmare. It will become obvious why he told me “off the record”.

It is hardly startling to say that stakeholder pensions – and every other development in personal finance – are forcing people to rely for their future welfare on investing in the stock market rather than paying tax and national insurance to the state.

As investors push more and more money into private stockmarket investments, the demand for shares is growing faster than the value in those shares. Demand for share investments, in other words, is outstripping supply. With-out going too far into economic modelling, you could argue that it is this – more and more money chasing shares – that is artificially boosting share prices.

Now, at some point in the future, that is going to change. If everyone invests the most they can to provide for their retirement, then eventually that flow of money into shares will stop growing.

Those people investing now will begin to retire and start drawing out money. And instead of a net inflow of money into share investments, there will be a net outflow. Result? Share prices instead of continually growing continually falling.

Let&#39s hope we are all ret-ired by then and safely locked into a level annuity.

Andrew Verity is personal finance correspondent for the BBC

Recommended

Rich pickings

General opinion is that there are very few young people who intend to vote while most over-55s intend to do so. So, predictably, the Conservatives are promising that those who have the most will hold on to as much as possible. They are still living in the Thatcher days when the electorate was mainly moved […]

B C Asset Management – Property Income and Growth Fund

Tuesday, 29 May 2001.Type: Split-capital investment trust.Aim: Income and growth by investing in UK property, investment trusts, corporate bonds and equities.Minimum investment: Subject to negotiation with stockbroker.Place of registration: Guernsey.Investment split: UK property 75 per cent, investment trusts, corporate bond s and equities 25 per cent.Yield: 9 per cent.Isa link: Yes.Charges: None.Commission: None.Tel: 01202 201438. 

Mortgage Next – Fixed Rate Fee Saver

Friday, 1 June 2001.Type: Fixed rate mortgage for members of Mortgage Next service.Fixed term: Until July 31, 2006.Fixed rate: 6.09 per cent.Minimum loan: £15,001, remortgages £25,001.Maximum loan: Up to 95 per cent of valuation subject to no maximum.Income multiples: Subject to negotiation.Arrangement fee: £299.Redemption fee: 7 per cent of amount repaid plus £100 until July […]

Investors &#39still switched on to technology funds&#39

Technology funds are continuing to grab the attention of investors despite recent lacklustre performance, according to online price and performance information provider Trustnet. The fund receiving the most hits from users of the website in April was Aberdeen Asset Managers&#39 technology unit trust, while three further tech funds appear in the top 20. But the […]

US loan growth is not painting a pretty picture for the US economy

Written by Mike Riddell One of the current big debates in global financial markets is whether investors should believe ‘hard’ rather than ‘soft’ data, where the usually reliable business and consumer surveys have been suggesting strengthening in global growth momentum for some time now, while the economic data that feeds through into the Gross Domestic […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment