View more on these topics

Verity&#39s view – 24th January 2001

So that&#39s it then. For all these years an industry employing hundreds of thousands, plus all the associated civil servants, company managers and hangers on have been referring to “independent financial advice” like it was a good thing.

The FSA itself has consistently urged people to seek independent financial advice. Poor old IFA Promotion has spent millions of its contributors&#39 money promoting independent advice, doing the Government a huge favour by helping the public understand at least one aspect of the financial system – the difference between advice that is independent and advice that is not.

Now it is being made manifestly clear exactly how little the FSA thinks of that once precious distinction. “The extensive research we have carried out as part of this review demonstrates that the regime we inherited now represents a major market distortion and has simply not delivered sufficient consumer benefits to justify maintaining it,” says chairman Howard Davies. “So we propose that it should be abolished…”

But what exactly has “independent” meant for all these years? The Independent newspaper used to declare itself “independent” in the sense that it had no dominant owner who might compromise its editorial freedom by, for example, making it clear his newspaper should be anti-European.

IFAs are independent in a similar sense. There is nothing in their ownership nor in their relationship with suppliers, which would compromise their ability to give advice in the best interest of their customers.

But why should ownership, or for that matter having one company that pays your commission, count for so much? There was always something ludicrously idealistic in what independent financial advice really meant.

A true, pure and perfect independent financial adviser would, at least in theory, comprehensively absorb every aspect of the client&#39s financial needs. They would then examine literally thousands of financial products, sifting out the dross until they arrived at the gem their client needed, tell them why they needed it in writing and disclose what they would get for selling it. Tied agents and company reps could only “advise” on one company&#39s product and their advice was bound to be inferior, influenced as it was by their relationship to their employer and/or sole commission payer.

Legislation such as the Financial Services Act 1986 was required to protect vulnerable customers from these perils by insisting that every financial adviser gave best advice.

Now we are told that this idealistic aspiration was flawed. The watchdog spent a lot of time and money commissioning a posh consultancy called Charles River Associates to work out whether IFAs ever recommended a product, or a provider, not because it was best but because it paid the best commission.

The conclusion used by the FSA to support its decision to change the regime (namely, “yes, they do, sometimes”) is about as Earth-shattering as saying “most people prefer more money to less money”, or “human beings sometimes sin”.

The true conclusion from Charles River&#39s research is that IFAs display commission bias so infrequently that they should be canonised as latter-day saints. The consumer detriment from commission bias is restricted to three product categories – distribution bonds, with-profits bonds and unit-linked endowments. On all the others, there is no evidence. Contrary to the cynicism of the money press, it appears that IFAs are very rarely influenced in their recommendations by the amount of commission.

On those rare occasions where consumer detriment does occur, it amounted – shock horror – to a spuriously calculated £140m. But hold on, that actually sounds like a comfortably small amount, especially given the billions of pounds of financial products sold every year or the mega-millions lost to consumers through factors like not getting financial advice at all.

Not only that, but IFAs offer their customers commission rebates in 30 per cent of all product sales. With tied agents, commission rebates are so infrequent as to be negligible. The FSA, supported by Charles River&#39s research, has persuaded me that IFAs must be the most altruistic, self-sacrificing professionals on the planet. We must get rid of them at once and replace them with something more confusing.

Andrew Verity is personal finance correspondent of the BBC

Recommended

NU with-profits bonuses cut by up to 19 per cent

Norwich Union has become the latest life office to slash annual bonus rates, hitting some with-profits policies with cuts of up to 19 per cent.The news comes after Scottish Widows admitted that it was reducing bonuses on its savings policies by around one-third.NU says it will cut bonuses on savings policies to 4.25 per cent […]

Momentum teams up with PMI consultancy SPS Wellbeing

Corporate IFA Momentum Financial Services is teaming up with private medical insurance consultancy SPS Wellbeing to expand its advice offering.The strategic partnership will enable Momentum, one of the UK&#39s 20 largest IFAs, to offer specialist advice on health benefits as well as its core business of pensions, investment and tax.

Swim the multi-channels

Financial services retailers are no longer restricted to offering transactions during normal office hours as consumers demand access around the clock via telephone and the internet. Intermediaries looking to develop their multi-channel strategies can learn about the benefits of channel selection and integration at a twoday conference in London in March.A host of industry figures […]

A capital idea

I am a higher-rate taxpayer with a capital gains tax liability arising this year. I have heard people talk about various tax-saving schemes and wondered if you could briefly outline the main schemesand explain how thetax reliefs work. During the 1990s, a number of initiatives were enacted to encourage investment into qualifying unquoted companies. These […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com