View more on these topics

Vanguard slams low-cost rivals over charges

Vanguard claims that low-cost funds that charge extra for tactical rebalancing add little value for clients.

In June, Vanguard launched five risk-rated multi-asset funds that use index trackers to a pre-set asset allocation, rather than tactical rebalancing.

The annual charge on the funds range from 0.29 per cent to 0.33 per cent, with no initial charge.

Head of sales Nick Blake says: “Other competitors are loading a margin for tactical rebalancing into their products. Our view is that it is difficult to get right consistently and add value over the long term.”

HSBC is the latest entrant into the low-cost area with the launch this month of three risk-rated funds, which have an annual charge of 0.5 per cent and no initial charge.

HSBC head of external distribution Phil Reid says: “If you get the asset allocation right, it has been shown that this will drive the most returns, so we think that our offering is competitive.

“You can get big distortions if you are not rebalancing. IFAs are using our funds as building blocks, so we do need to take a view in terms of asset allocation.”

Evolve Financial Planning director James Norton says: “HSBC will get some asset allocation decisions right and others wrong but over the long term the cost will outweigh any benefit delivered.”

In February, JP Morgan launched a low-cost fund with a maximum total expense ratio of 0.55 per cent. Investors pay for stock selection, which is included in the annual charge.

Schroders launched three low-cost funds this year with capped TERs of between 0.4 and 0.5 per cent. Schroders makes tactical asset allocation decisions and the cost is included in the AMC.

Fidelity launched three low-cost funds this month. The commission-free share class has a TER of 0.67, which includes the cost of active asset allocation.
JP Morgan, Schroders and Fidelity declined to comment.

Recommended

1

FSCS and bondholders to vote on Lifemark loan deal

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme and other Lifemark bondholders have been asked to vote on whether a £95m (US$150m) loan facility arranged by Keydata founder Stewart Ford should be accepted. Lifemark provisional administrator KPMG Luxemburg has called a meeting of bondholders in a notice published on the Luxemburg Stock Exchange last week. The FSCS is […]

10

Pensions Regulator warns active member discounts are not “fair” or “acceptable”

The Pensions Regulator has warned pension schemes that offering active member discounts is not “fair” or “acceptable”. It has issued a statement warning trustees of defined-contribution pension schemes that it may take action if they choose a scheme which offers better rates to active members. The regulator says: “Excessive costs and charges in a DC […]

Guide

Guide: 10 required letters — what to send, to whom and when?

This guide from Johnson Fleming will take you through the required communication and also give ideas for additional actions that will ensure your auto-enrolment project is a success. The topics in this guide include: the letters you need to send out; what to send and when; the importance of employee engagement; and what to consider as additional communication.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Not convinced that rebalancing makes much sense longer term and where it does it is better done by a fund house than an IFA. In any event I hope to see more of these “lower” cost solutions in the near future.

    Figures as low as 0.25% to 0.5% pa certainly call into question some of the plafform and advice costs that are being added

Leave a comment