View more on these topics

Urgent need for a clear definition of misselling

IFAs are operating in a hostile trading environment. If we are to survive, we need to be able to focus on client-related issues and be able to give advice in a commercial manner.

Stakeholder and Sandler issues aside, the biggest barrier preventing us from moving forward is the urgent need to define what misselling is.

As professionals, we are ridiculed for poor advice despite the fact that many of us work to the highest levels of integrity and have attained many professional qualifications. We are exposed to criticism while we are unable to define what a missale is and what a “proper” sale is.

Criticism is accepted as part of the job but the hiatus in the PI market has crystallised the issue of misselling into an urgent problem that we must resolve for the financial integrity of our businesses and the peace of mind of our clients.

The regulator has had many years to define misselling and this failure is difficult to understand or justify.

The purpose of this letter is to ask whether MM can take a proactive stance on this issue and act as a focal point for comment. Perhaps we can come up with some ideas to help the regulator.

What is required is a clear definition so that where advice takes place and suitable recommendations have been made taking into account the client&#39s circumstances and all known facts at the time of the sale and that this has been properly documented, this should be classed as a compliant sale.

Once deemed a compliant sale, events thereafter should not lead to compensation in respect of that original sale.

Obtaining a definition of this nature would be beneficial to consumers and advisers. As part of this exercise, I would also welcome a rethink of key features documents.

Complaints tend only to occur when clients have made a loss. If an investment is in equities and cannot be shown to be for a period of 10 years or more, a projection including negative growth makes a lot of sense, given recent events.

This would remove the credibility of those who say that the adviser told them that the investment couldn&#39t fall in value and would prevent the so called sharks misselling in the first place.

While this final point may be controversial, I think that a proper definition of misselling is essential and I hope you are able to help us with this.

Peter Emery

Principal,

Emery (IFA) Associates,

Halstead, Essex

Recommended

FSA smoothes over cash reserves rules

The FSA has unveiled plans for life offices&#39 capital requirements which link reserves with smoothing. The proposal would means that the more smoothing an insurer carries out, the more capital it would have to hold. The FSA claims this would reduce pressure on with-profits funds to sell equities when stockmarkets fall as the capital requirement […]

nvesta – Selecta Plan

Type: Guaranteed equity bond Aim: Income or growth linked to the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 indices Minimum-maximum investment: Lump sum £3,000-£2m, Isa £3,000-£7,000 Term: Five years Guarantee: Original capital returned in full provided indices do not fall by more than 30% and return to at least their starting levels Return: Cautious option &#45 6.1% […]

Kensington Mortgages offers fixed rate for adverse credit borrowers

Kensington Mortgages is offering a three year fixed rate mortgage for adverse credit borrowers. It says it is the first specialist lender to offer such a deal. Rates on the mortgage start at 5.75 per cent and are valid until November 30th 2006. There are no early repayment charges after the first three years of […]

Standard snubs carpetbagger

Standard Life has told carpetbagger David Stonebanks that it would be unreasonable to expect the company&#39s board to help with the drafting of a proposal which it believes would damage the company. It says there is no basis for his request for a judicial review of its decision to dismiss his last request for a […]

Greece: the sideshow continues

Artemis managers James Foster, Mark Page and Laurent Millet comment on the Greek deal, describing it as “just another fudge” getting in the way of bigger developments in China, the UK and the US. To read the full article click here.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment