View more on these topics

UBS trader fights FCA Libor ban in court

UK-Currency-Money-Coin-Pounds-GBP-700x450.jpgPressure from bosses led a UBS trader to set the key Libor interest rate in favour of the bank’s commercial interests, a court has heard.

Lawyers for former trader Arif Hussein told the High Court yesterday that he was only acting in line with company policy when discussing submissions for the key benchmark, in an attempt to overturn the FCA’s decision to ban him from the industry.

“He was doing precisely what he believed he was expected to do,” the BBC quotes Hussein’s lawyer, Sara George of Stephenson Harwood, as saying. “There is no hint of subterfuge or dishonesty. This is a man who was doing his job diligently down to the very last minute.

“The [FCA] has failed to explain how a very junior trader, who had no other experience of financial services, no training, no guidance and no possible means of benefitting from a practice, should have known in 2008 and 2009 that it was obviously wrong for trading positions to be factored into Libor submissions.”

Hussein was the former head of UBS’s GBP Rates Desk. The FCA alleges that there were 21 times in 2009 when he communicated his preference or lack thereof to those who submitted the Libor rate.

The FCA evidenced the “chats” Hussein has with Adrian Keller, UBS’ Libor submitter, in court yesterday, claiming these provided indications of whether his trading positions would suffer or prosper from a move in Libor.


FCA logo glass 620x430

Former Libor traders launch complaint against FCA

Two former UBS Libor traders have brought complaints against the FCA to the Complaints Commissioner over claims the regulator did not comply with its disclosure obligations. An Upper Tribunal decision made last week relating to a case involving former UBS GBP rates desk head Arif Hussein refers to an ongoing complaint against the FCA. According to the decision, […]


New Year’s Honours list hails investment and pensions leaders

Leading figures in the investment and pensions space across government, regulators and industry have featured in this year’s New Year’s Honours list. Chief executive of the Green Investment Bank Shaun Kingsbury and adviser to the chair of the Green Investment Bank Irene Adams were both awarded an Order of the British Empire for their services […]


How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]

Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Whilst I would in no way suggest ignorance of the law should be a protection, I think this in the article is key “The [FCA] has failed to explain how a very junior trader, who had no other experience of financial services, no training, no guidance and no possible means of benefitting from a practice”
    This implies Hussein was let down by his employer and it is those above him who should have been banned and he should simply have been retrained.
    It’s a bit like the Army’s training for the Geneva convention. Some of us knew right from wrong without the need for specific training, whilst the backgrounds for some of my peers was that the Army taight them right from wrong for the firs time in their lives. Once you’d all been trained to know the difference between a legal and an illegal order, if you faield to act accordingley, you would only have yourself to blame.
    If he truly wasn’t trained…. who is MORALLY to blame…. him or his superiors?

Leave a comment