View more on these topics

Two consortiums to decide on Keydata bailout this week

Lifemark administrators will this week learn whether a consortium of IFAs or a group of Keydata bondholders has been able to secure funding to bail out the stricken firm.

KPMG Luxembourg, the provisional administrator to Lifemark which is holding the savings of 23,000 UK Keydata bond investors, will find out whether either of the consortiums can deliver on timescale the £12.9m-£19.3m needed to prevent its traded life settlement policy portfolios from collapsing.

The consortium of IFAs led by Norwich & Peterborough Building Society – who advised clients to invest in Keydata products – are keen to avoid liability from any collapse of Lifemark by providing a loan to the group. The Keydata bondholder consortium is keen to ensure Lifemark survives to avoid an asset fire-sale that would render their investments practically worthless.

If the bondholder and IFA consortiums say they can both deliver lifeline loans then KPMG will consider combining them into one consortium.

Meanwhile, an offer by Stewart Ford, who founded both Keydata and Lifemark, to help save the group by handing over more control of his so-called Billericay portfolio of Lifemark bonds was blocked by KPMG last week. It is thought this is because KPMG believes it is inappropriate for Ford, who was a member of the Lifemark board before the company fell into crisis and he resigned, to be involved in the future of the company.

The consortiums are now the last hope for the investors to avoid a liquidation of the Lifemark portfolio that would diminish their £350m of investments.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is expected to rule on September 20 that it will not provide help to the investors.

Keydata Lifemark investors would then have no choice but to claim for compensation from the IFAs that advised them to invest in Keydata products, either through lawyers or via the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Norwich & Peterborough’s decision to lead the IFA consortium comes after the group has admitted that its total liability over Keydata would be £50m if the Ombudsman was to rule in favour of all clients it advised to invest in the bonds, if the Lifemark portfolio becomes worthless.

The group is already facing Keydata claims including 250 from law firm Regulatory Legal, and is battling a preliminary ruling by the Ombudsman that it pay an elderly couple £28,000 over its advice to invest in Keydata.

Recommended

TISA to head up DIFs regulation debate  

The Tax Incentivised Savings Association has called for the industry to come together to address the FSA’s concerns around distributor-influenced funds. The FSA has recently expressed its concerns that firms using DIFs should ensure that the investments are in the best interests of each client. Within the RDR the regulator also stressed that the pricing […]

Polar Capital set to acquire HIM Capital

Polar Capital Holdings is set to acquire specialist fund manager HIM Capital. The deal is expected to conclude before the end of this month and is designed to bolster Polar Capital’s franchise in the financials sector. HIM’s subsidiary, HIM Capital Limited, was previously called Hiscox Investment Management prior to the management buyout from Hiscox plc […]

Aifa is without a director general as Cummings starts new role at TheCityUK

Former Association of Independent Financial Advisers director general Chris Cummings begins his new role as chief executive of financial services promotional body TheCityUK today, leaving Aifa without a director general for an unknown period. Aifa has appointed a new director general, Stephen Gay, who is currently Aviva director of distribution development. Gay will also take […]

Tree - thumbnail

The politics of healthcare

Healthcare is already one of the key battlefields in May’s general election, with each of the main parties committing to deliver improvements to the NHS and public health.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. We have no idea what the FSA is up to, what the SFO is doing or what day it is, what a shambles.

  2. KPMG should be asking the Keydata victims if they would accept S Ford’s involvment in any rescue package. KPMG are not the ones standing to loose their savings. In fact if they read the views of the investors on the 2 websites available to victims they will find that a large number would accept a resue involving S Ford.

  3. If there is a ‘no compensation’ decision next week from the FSCS I think IFA’s should flee the Towns and Cities like folks do when a Category 5 Hurricane is due.

  4. If KPMG consider it inappropriate for Mr Ford to salvage the Keydata situation, I trust that they will stand the losses which will ultimately occur.

    I don’t really care who puts the money up to rescue this mess!!

  5. You wouldnt close a bank just because an employee stole a large amount of money. Why didnt Ford just pay the 5m tax demand and carry on trading? The FSA were premature to say the least in shutting him down. PWC seem to be doing nothing other than running up a huge bill whilst permanently postponing their reports. Someone has to grasp the nettle.

Leave a comment