View more on these topics

TSC wants FCA objective overhaul

The objectives of the Financial Conduct Authority need to be overhauled to avoid unnecessary complexity and perverse consequences, according to the Treasury select committee.

Draft legislation proposes giving the regulator the strategic objective of “protecting and enhancing confidence in the UK financial system”. It also proposes three operational objectives of securing an appropriate degree of protection for consumers, protecting and enhancing the integrity of the financial system and promoting efficiency and choice in the market.

In its report into the accountability of the FCA, published today, the TSC says the Government should scrap the strategic objective or, at the very least, amend it. It says the current wording could lead the regulator to act in way that maintains a “misplaced” confidence. Consumer groups warned the committee it could make the regulator downplay consumer detriment to maintain confidence.

The committee says if the Government will not scrap it revising it to “ensuring fair, efficient and transparent markets” and adding a second strategic objective of promoting effective competition for the benefit of consumers would be an improvement.

However, it adds: “There is a risk of confusion created by multiple tiers of objectives and duties.

“The revised strategic objective of ensuring fair efficient and transparent markets already largely embodied in the current operational objectives. With the addition of a competition objective they would cover all that is required.”

The draft financial services bill committee, the FSA, the Independent Commission on Banking, and consumer groups have all criticised the wording. In November, Treasury financial secretary Mark Hoban defended the current proposals. He told the TSC: “You cannot prise apart the strategic and operational objectives. The strategic objective is the umbrella statement about the role of the FCA. It is the operational objectives which give the meat to the bones and set out what the FCA will be doing.”

Under the draft bill, the FCA will have the power to ban products for up to a year if it considers there is potential for substantial consumer detriment. The committee’s report says that it supports the need for a judgement based product intervention policy, but says it is concerned the regulator may not understand new products as well as firms and that the power could undermine competition and innovation.

It says: “We recommend that clear guidance be issued to firms when such powers are used. Their use should be sparing and the merits of each case carefully considered before intervention.”

The draft also gives the FCA power to issue early warning notices when it starts an investigation into a firm. However, the committee says the Government should continue to consult on the move because investigations could turn up nothing and damage the reputation of firms.

The report will inform changes made to the draft legislation with a bill expected in the coming weeks.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. How can we expect the FCA to be any different than the FSA in its method of operation, it is a potentially inadequate regulator being set up by the same people who set up and administer the FSAs conduct.

    We need some “blue sky” thinking allied with a large dollop of common sense, whilst setting aside any daft and draconian EU directives which are not in our country’s interest. (I think the Apostrophe in the right place – I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong)

    De polarisation has failed, this industry needs to get back to the drawing board, financial advisers and planners need to get back to basics when dealing with clients planning :-

    Living too long
    Dieing too soon
    Getting Sick or disabled
    A decent income in retirement.

    All this tax planning B S is a crock, the financial services industry prospers on the back of products not “advice” and life and investment firms need to wake up to what is really going down, the total destruction of the IFA secotr and along with that, a consumer detriment the likes of which “WHICH” will kick off about when it is too late to stop it.

    The Lunatics are clearly in charge of the asylum.

  2. I’m with Ned on this.
    How can there be any change if its run by the same people in the same offices?

  3. Exactly ~ the TSC needs to ensure that the FCA is not merely an FSA Mk. II, which is very much what it looks like being.

    The TSC should also give Hector Sants a good hard grilling over his cost estimate of £50,000,000 for transitioning the FSA into the FCA. For God’s sake ~ £5,000,000 would be lavish in the extreme, let alone ten times that amount.

  4. A good hiding would do more good than a good grilling Julian.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm