View more on these topics

Trust reality

The result of a recent High Court judgment in the case of Rysaffe Trustee Co (CI) Ltd •CIR [2002] EWHC 1114 (Ch) seems to be that settlors can easily avoid the 10-yearly periodic charge to inheritance tax on discretionary trusts.

This can be done by employing segmentation, a technique which is well known and indeed well used for life policies but less so for trusts.

The workings of the periodic charge would take more than this article to explain. However, the benefit of segmentation, which Rysaffe confirms, is that it creates extra nil-rate bands for periodic charge purposes.

In the case before the court, the settlor created five identical trusts of £10 each on separate days over a five-week period in 1984. Shortly after that, he transferred 6,900 shares in a private limited company to the trustee of each of the five settlements.

The 10-yearly charge arose in 1994 and the Revenue contended that the five separate trusts should be treated as one for inheritance tax purposes.

The Special Commissioner held that the establishment of the five settlements and the later transfer of shares were “associated operations” under S268 Inheritance Tax Act 1984. The Special Commissioner thus held that since a disposition included a “disposition by associated operations” under S272, there was one settlement within S43 and one settlement for the purpose of the periodic charge in S64.

The High Court judge, however, considered the general understanding of trust practitioners was that it was for the settlor to decide whether he intended to create one settlement or more than one. The judge stated that the structure created by a particular settlor would depend on how he chose to do it.

The question was, therefore, whether the legislation changed this approach for tax purposes.

S43 IHTA 1984 defines “settlement” as “any disposition or dispositions of property”. The judge stated that the use of the plural in the section meant no more than that it was possible to have more than one disposition to the trustee of a single settlement.

In addition, the use of the plural was not a positive enactment that, where there were two or more dispositions to different settlements, they formed one settlement for inheritance tax purposes.

This was true even if they formed two or more settlements under the general law. Further, the judge&#39s view that there were five settlements, not one, was not changed by the fact that the original terms of the trusts were identical in all except formal respects.

Turning to the associated operations provision, the judge said that the terms set out in S268 IHTA 1984 did not apply to the case.

The Special Commissioner&#39s starting point should have been to consider whether the property was “property comprised in a settlement” within SS43 and 64.

If it was such property, without the need to rely on the extension of “disposition” to cover also a disposition by associated operations, the associated operations provision was not relevant.

Applying those general principles to the shares contained in the first of the five settlements, the judge said the trustees held the shares on trust by a “disposition of property”.

As such, these shares on their own satisfied the requirements of S43(2)(b).

Therefore, they formed property comprised in a settlement so as to invoke the charging provision in S64. Such an interpretation depended only on the ordinary meaning of disposition, without recourse to the extended definition of a disposition by associated operations.

It was neither necessary nor proper to invoke the extended statutory definition to infer that the shares were property comprised in a settlement. That analysis ext-ended equally to the other four parcels of shares.

It seems unlikely that the Revenue will meekly accept this result. However, if they successfully appeal, then this is unlikely to plug the gap. Settlors would simply create segmented trusts, where some minor differences existed, and thus distinguish their actions. This would drag the Revenue into further litigation.

The more likely outcome is legislative change to correct this situation.

In summary, segmentation may succeed for trusts created now but for how much longer will new trusts have this opportunity?


SVM goes continental

SVM Asset Management has introduced the continental Europe fund, an Oeic that aims for capital growth by investing mainly in European large caps. The fund is benchmarked against the FTSE World Europe ex UK index and despite the focus on large caps, the portfolio will also include mid-caps that appear to have high growth potential. […]

Retired and emotional

Shirley and David, in their early 50s, have recently taken early retirement from successful City careers. They have built up a considerable portfolio of pension and non-pension assets and live in a valuable house in the South-east. They have a target income of £50,000 net a year and are also quite anxious about the fact […]

Britannic Money extends range of flexible loans

Britannic Money is adding two new fixed-rate deals to its range of flexible loans.The lender claims the rates offers the perfect tonic to borrowers concerned about potential rises in interest rates.Borrowers can fix for either two or three years at 4.49 per cent and 4.99 per cent respectively. Both loans are available up to 95 […]

JPMorgan shuffles team

JPMorgan Fleming is restructuring its European equities team of 40 after former head of European equities Andrew Spencer was appointed chief investment officer of JPMorgan Funds&#39 retail business in the US.Spencer will take up his new position in December. William Meadon, who has managed segregated funds for the European equities team over the past seven […]

UK housebuilders remain a value trap – despite post-Brexit falls

Despite the sharp drop in housebuilders following the Brexit result, valuations in the highly illiquid market are still at elevated levels. And whilst some investors may take comfort from superficially low price/earnings multiples, are earnings sustainable over the long term, asks Holly Cassell, Assistant Manager of the Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund. Click here to […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm