View more on these topics

Treasury frozen out

Considering the implications of the Arctic Systems case

So at last we know. Him and Mrs Jones had a thing going on – and it worked. Well, for them. But having suffered defeat in the courts, true to form, the Treasury will be looking to get its own way in the future by amending the rules. Is it just my imagination or have we passed this way before? There is a strong temptation to ask David Ruffin. Three song references in one paragraph. Not bad.

In the House of Lords, the Law Lords unanimously agreed that the dividends paid to Mrs Jones as a shareholder should not be assessed to tax on Mr Jones. You will, I am sure, have at least a superficial understanding of the facts of the case. But for those of you who need a reminder, I can do no better than to quote Lord Hoffman’s summing up of the facts.

“Chapter 1A of Part XV of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 contains anti-avoidance provisions intended in principle to prevent people from reducing their tax liabilities by settlements, gifts or similar arrangements which transfer income or income-producing assets to their minor children or under which they or their spouses retained an interest. These provisions go back many years.

“The question in the appeal was whether they apply to the arrangements made by Mr and Mrs Jones to distribute the income of a company through which Mr Jones, with back-office support from Mrs Jones, traded as a computer consultant. When Mr Jones was made redundant in 1992, he decided to go freelance. He and his wife acquired a shelf company called Arctic Systems Ltd. The formation agents sold them the two issued £1 shares for £1 each and Mr Jones was appointed sole director. Mrs Jones was appointed secretary.

“It appears that the agencies through which computer consultants offered their services insisted upon dealing only with companies, presumably to avoid any possible argument that the consultant was in substance an employee.

“The company then entered into contracts with customers to provide the services of Mr Jones. The performance of these services generated the company’s income. Mrs Jones did the bookkeeping, dealt with the bank and the insurance company, paid tax and VAT and attended to correspondence. This took four or five hours a week.

“The income was distributed on the advice of their accountant. The agreed statement of facts says that in the relevant year 1999-2000, the company’s receipts were £78,355. Mr Jones took £6,520 as salary and Mrs Jones £3,600. The latter is accepted to have been a reasonable figure for Mrs Jones’s services but the former figure is, given the company’s receipts, plainly less than Mr Jones could have earned in the market.

“After these and other deductions, the company’s taxable profits were £26,372, on which it paid £4,927 corporation tax. It is said to have declared and paid dividends of £35,676.25 to each of the shareholders but given the amount of distributable profits, this may be a mistake. The precise figures do not however matter. The pattern of distribution over previous years was much the same.

“The tax advantages to Mr and Mrs Jones of receiving the company’s earnings as dividends rather than salary were, first, that National Insurance contributions would have been payable on salary but were not payable on dividends and, second, that the dividend payable to Mrs Jones was taxable at a lower rate than it would have been if added to the income of Mr Jones. For these reasons, it was contemplated from the outset that the company would pay Mr and Mrs Jones low salaries and distribute the rest of its income as dividends.”

The key legislation was that in section 660A ICTA 1988 which applies to treat income arising under a settlement during the life of the settlor as that of the settlor for all income tax purposes. Relevant parts of section 660A are reproduced here:(1) Income arising under a settlement during the life of the settlor shall be treated for all purposes of the Income Tax Acts as the income of the settlor and not as the income of any other person unless the income arises from property in which the settlor has no interest.(2) Subject to the following provisions of this section, a settlor shall be regarded as having an interest in property if that propertyor any derived property is, or will or may become, payable to or applicable for the benefit of the settlor or spouse in any circumstances whatsoever.(6) The reference in subsection (1) above to a settlement does not include an outright gift by one spouse to the other of property from which income arises unless:

(a) the gift does not carry a right to the whole of that income or(b) the property given is wholly or substantially a right to income.

For this purpose, a gift is not an outright gift if it is subject to conditions or if the property given or any derived property is or will or may become, in any circumstances whatsoever, payable to or applicable for the benefit of the donor.

The first thing to decide was whether there was a settlement. Without a settlement, there would be no case to answer. More next week.


Variable mortgages uptake sees 50 per cent increase says Spicerhaart

The percentage of borrowers opting for variable mortgages has increased by 50 per cent in July, according to the Spicerhaart Financial Services monthly mortgage survey.Despite the base rate rising for the fifth time in a year to 5.75 per cent in July, the percentage of borrowers opting for variable mortgages increased by 50 per cent, […]

Home makers

With a shortage of available housing and spiralling prices putting buying a home beyond the reach of many, the Government intends to act to provide some much needed assistance in the market. But are these measures enough, asks Will Henley

Axa results show strong life and savings growth

Axa’s 2007 first half results show that life and savings APE business is up 26 per cent on a like for like basis, from £438m to £553m, compared to the same period in 2006.The figures, which show a total APE life and savings increase of 69 per cent from £327m to £553m, take account of […]

An inspiration to us all

Over curry last week, the Diary was delighted to discover inspiring information about the past life of one Standard Life PR.Under the employ of the Cabinet Office, Paul Keeble used to promote across the country the Citizens’ Charter for public services. The brainchild of then Prime Minister John Major, the Charter cherished and celebrated transparency, […]

How can I help develop my professional connections?

Graeme Ballantyne, business consultancy manager, looks at how you can maximise the opportunities through your professional connections As we move through the summer months it’s perhaps a good time to pause and reflect on whether the plans you’ve made for your business are bearing fruit. One area we at PruConsulting know many advisers have been […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm