View more on these topics

Tread cautiously

In my next few articles, I want to look at some ways in which IFAs can learn from the various regulatory reviews and legal judgments affecting financial services. Although some of the examples I will be discussing have resulted in penalties or reprimands to the advisers involved, an understanding of the issues can greatly assist other IFAs in giving appropriate advice to their clients.

The Financial Ombudsman Service deals with complaints against authorised firms on almost the complete range of financial services and products, including personal pensions but excluding occupational pensions. It is a free service to complainants but the firm which is the object of the complaint will usually be charged a case fee, win or lose, unless the FOS believes the complaint to have been “frivolous and vexatious”.

Last month, the FOS reported on some of the complaints it has dealt with recently concerning singlepremium bonds, including high-income or precipice bonds. These cases relate specifically to bonds sold as a result of mailshots and advertising but it is clear that the same principles will apply to face-to-face advice.

In the first case, an IFA&#39s newsletter described an extra income and growth plan offering tax-free income of a little over 9 per cent a year over three years as being suitable for a cautious investor. The capital return was linked to a leading European equity index. By the date of maturity of the complainant&#39s plan, the index had fallen such that the investor got back much less than she had invested.

While the firm was perhaps a little too glib in describing such a bond as being suitable for a cautious investor, could the investor really believe that her capital was even moderately secure after receiving such a high level of tax-free income, which was probably around treble the rate she could have expected from a building society account?

But the FOS rejected the IFA&#39s defence that the client bought the bond in an execution-only sale as no advice had been sought by the client or given by the firm. In the FOS&#39s judgment, the firm&#39s newsletter was so comprehensive and compelling in its support of this product that the FOS believed an average person would legitimately have taken the article and subsequent personalised newsletter to represent advice. Compensation was awarded against the IFA.

What are the lessons from this case? First, take care in how you word adverts, newsletter articles and bulk mailings to clients and prospective clients. You might consider that giving comprehensive information about a product on which the client can act if he so wishes represents an invitation to execution-only transactions but this potentially important FOS ruling demonstrates otherwise.

Second, you must understand that high-income bonds which do not guarantee a return of capital are not generally considered to be low-risk investments which are suitable for cautious investors, even though the income during the period of the bond is often guaranteed.

An associated case quoted by the FOS related to a high-income bond advertised in a national newspaper by an IFA firm. The complainant had responded to the advert and decided to invest after receiving a product brochure and key features document. The capital value of this bond at the end of three years was linked to the Nasdaq index. As with almost all such bonds over the period of the equity bear market, the client was dismayed to receive a much depleted capital sum at the end of the term.

In this case, the FOS rejected the complaint on the grounds that the IFA firm had not specifically targeted the client, the advert being what is known in legal terms as an invitation to treat, meaning an invitation for interested parties to contact the advertiser. This view contrasts with the previous case where the FOS considered sending the newsletter to an existing client, followed by a personalised letter, as an offer or advice by the IFA firm.

Where the dividing line exists between “invitation to treat” and “offer or advice” is a difficult issue which I fear is likely to occupy the FOS in future. But the IFA in the second case helped his cause by clearly stating a number of risk warnings, including “only suitable if the investor can afford an element of risk to the capital sum invested”, “does not guarantee the return of your original investment” and other comments.

In rejecting the complaint, the FOS said: “We confirm that the firm had given the client full information about how the bond worked and about the possible outcome of an investment in it. We did not consider that any of the material was misleading and we noted that the firm had provided a clear statement that customers should seek investment advice if they were in any doubt about the bond&#39s suitability.”

Many valuable lessons can be learned, including the obvious one that high-income bonds can be a valuable part of the portfolio of a significant number of investors, despite bad press.

In two further cases, the FOS strongly suggested that high-income or growth products which did not guarantee full return of capital at the end of the contract term could not be described as being low risk which, unfortunately, was exactly the term used by the two IFAs in question. I mention these cases by way of mild contrast with the first case where the FOS found against the IFA for describing the investment as being suitable for cautious investors.

So now we know. Whether cautious or low risk, the terminology matters not. Particularly where a feature of a bond is that the capital return could fall by twice the amount of any corresponding reduction in the appropriate index, surely the suitability of these bonds is only towards mediumor high-risk clients and then generally only as a part of a more diversified portfolio?

I will continue this theme in my next article.


Investment funds sales double

New retail sales of investment funds fell in January but were still double those at the same time last year, according to the IMA. Its monthly statistics show that sales slid to £505m last month from £844m in December 2003 although this was still far in excess of January 2003, when sales were just £249m. […]

IFA Care looks to advisers&#39 retired clients

Long-term care training and support specialist IFA Care is extending its brief to become an organisation for advisers focusing on retired clients. Chairman Graham Fidoe said at the firm&#39s annual conference last week that its education programme has been looking at issues such as inheritance tax planning, legal issues, equity release as well as income […]

L&G cuts bonuses but posts positive results

Legal & General has moved in line with many of its rivals to cut bonuses as part of its 2003 bonus declaration.Annual bonuses on life policies have dropped by 0.25 per cent to 0.75 per cent of the sum assured and by half a per cent of the existing bonus to 1.25 per cent. Normal […]

Principal interest

Anna is concerned about the capital gains tax position on her house when she sells it. She is currently living abroad, having left the UK to be with her husband. They married soon after leaving the UK. She has been letting her house since they went abroad. She intends to sell it in due course […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm