View more on these topics

Transparency has reduced rating role

Legal & General head of credit research Georg Grodzki says if credit ratings were scrapped market volatility would not necessarily increase.

Giving evidence to the Treasury select committee last week, Grodzki said there is far more transparency over companies’ financial affairs now compared with when the rating agencies were at the height of their power in the 1970s.

He said: “Not having agencies would not necessarily lead to more volatility. Compared with the 1970s, there is a lot more transparency about corporate financial affairs. It is now much easier to analyse a company without the privileged access to proprietary information which the agencies sometimes dwell on as their competitive advantage. The market is less disadvantaged these days relative to rating agencies.”

Proposals from the European Commission for new rating agency regulation could mean that institutional investors are required to do their own due diligence. Credit ratings agency III also wants investors to reduce how often they use external ratings.

Grodzki added that while small investors might struggle to scrutinise all the corporate information now available in the public domain compared with better resourced large investors, they are “not completely in the dark”.

Recommended

MEP Bowles presses for tax simplification

MEP Sharon Bowles has called for the European Union to pay closer attention to rules which allow people to reduce their tax bill. In a speech to the Brussels Tax Forum this afternoon, European parliament Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee chair Bowles said exemptions from headline tax rates risk undermining the sustainability of public finances. […]

6

Soaring PI premiums may force firms to self-insure

Sesame Bankhall Group has warned that hardening rates in the professional indemnity insurance market may prevent some firms from accessing PI cover and could force them to self-insure. Managing director of distribution Nick Kelly (pictured) says firms are facing rising PI premiums and excesses and have access to less comprehensive cover. He says he has […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I agree. Not only are the credit rating agencies incompetent, which they’ve repeatedly proven, but they are also irrelevant. Look at the market’s reaction after the U.S was downgraded. U.S. debt rallied. That is because the markets already set the credit worthiness of any borrower that has outstanding paper. The price is out there. The price of credit default swaps is out there. That is the ‘real’ credit rating of a sovereign or corporate borrower. Ratings are both redundant and dumber than the crowd-sourced price that already exists. I talk about the failure of the credit rating agencies in my book “Jackass Investing.” I’m pleased to provide readers with a complimentary link to the chapter in which they’re discussed (Myth #13: It’s Best to Follow Expert Advice):
    http://bit.ly/ugSnBf

Leave a comment