Alistair Cunningham: DB transfer reform needs us all to chip in

Alistair-Cunningham-700.jpgI have been thinking a lot about risk recently and am frustrated by the glacial pace of change in some key areas.

Firstly, scammers are still highly prevalent, with virtually no meaningful progress in stopping the tide. I accept part of this may be perception, as I am inundated with adverts from pension liberation fraudsters, in part, I suspect, due to my attempts to investigate further the false promises they make.

The Pensions Regulator has stated there could be close to 800,000 single-member SSASs in existence. On one hand, these members do not enjoy the legal protection afforded to other pension schemes and the SSAS is the principal tool of the liberator; however, to ban them would be disproportionate, as they remain a useful tool for a number of owner-managed businesses.

Meanwhile, I have written at length on the issues that could mean we face a perfect storm of negative factors around final salary transfers.

My expectation is that the result of CP17/16: Advising on Pension Transfers, will be for the standard of advice to increase, but at the expense of complicating the process for the average firm. This is not necessarily negative, as such advice is multi-faceted. I would also welcome the new transfer value comparator and appropriate pension transfer analysis complementing the existing use of critical yields.

Compartmentalising this advice has always been difficult, as the nature of a decision to give up safeguarded benefits should always be holistic, and I suspect this will be a further outcome. But this consultation is only the beginning. I hope the FCA, TPR, the Department for Work and Pensions and other interested parties will begin to work closer together.

Mandating partial transfers will stop the decision to transfer from being binary. What makes it harder today is that a member is often forced to transfer their entire benefits and I think trustees see partial transfers as a burden.

This does not need to be the case, as mechanisms exist for transfers in divorce and, as a transfer out is commonly a voluntary de-risking of the scheme, it could be to the benefit of all interested parties.

The other spectre of pension freedoms – unrestricted access beyond age 55 – has not disappeared either, with £10bn reported to have been taken out under the new rules since 2015. Half of these pots were cashed in totally and it may be some time until we see the ramifications of this.

Of course, a major source of instability (and indeed risk) comes from the Treasury’s incessant tinkering with pensions. Let’s see if the Autumn Budget passes over the area this time around.

I have always tried to have “the serenity to accept the things I cannot change” but with a background heavily influenced by pensions and the planning around pensions, I feel I must endeavour to have a positive influence if there is any possibility.

It will require regulators and legislators to make the most significant changes but, where possible, financial planners can rally in the direction of positive change on transfer reform.

It might be a little late for a response to the FCA’s advising on pension transfers consultation paper but I would welcome anyone to get in touch.

Alistair Cunningham is director of Wingate Financial Planning


Justin Cash, Editor of Money Marketing

Pru’s advice push is a delicate balancing act

Our cover story this week is about a financial planning firm which has more than doubled its adviser numbers in the past five years. The name might surprise you: Prudential. Evidently, the brand is familiar. It’s a savings product titan and, many moons ago, had a unique business model that captured the public’s imagination. What […]


Which financial services names have made the Rich List?

Peter Hargreaves has jumped to 42nd position on the Sunday Times Rich List, a climb of nine places from last year, after seeing his wealth grow £849m to £3.2bn. Hargreaves is no longer on the Hargreaves Lansdown board but has kept a 32.2 per cent stake in the company – the value of which has […]

Providers review lifestyling strategies after FCA talks

There are marked differences in how pension providers are changing their lifestyling strategies on default funds following the introduction of pension freedoms. Earlier this month it emerged that Standard Life was changing the investment strategy of its default pension fund, affecting more than one million existing customers. Scottish Widows has also changed the default investment […]

Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]

The What of Trusts: Gift Trusts(part 1)

Helen O’Hagan, Technical Manager at Prudential looks at the concept of trusts, starting with Gift trusts and why they can be confusing and complex for many advisers. W – why use a gift trust?H – how to set up a gift trustA – access for the settlor and beneficiariesT – taxation of the trust WHY […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Robert Milligan 3rd October 2017 at 1:09 pm

    Based on a previous MM article, there is a DB funding shortfall of approximately £465,000,000,000 so if Everyone wanted to “Transfer Out”, who may I ask would not get “their” money. I have just seen a valuation reduced by 20% to “safe-guard” the remaining members, this can not be right. This whole shambles MUST be STOPPED, NOW.

Leave a comment