View more on these topics

Trade bodies unite to tackle legacy commission issue

Adviser and provider trade bodies are working together to address the FSA’s concerns over legacy commission.

Money Marketing understands Aifa, the Association of British Insurers and the Investment Management Association are working on a combined solution to be put to the FSA as part of its legacy commission consultation. The regulator sent a letter to trade bodies in March to clarify that legacy commission will be banned under the retail distribution review, although trail commission brokered before 2013 can continue.

The FSA defines legacy commission as additional commission payable under a contract signed before December 31, 2012 but as a result of an event that takes place after that date but there is still a lack of clarity over the definition.

The industry has called on the FSA to provide clarity on the treatment of legacy business after the RDR and specific rules about what the regulator deems to be new business.

Aifa policy director Andrew Strange says: “Legacy remains one of the parts of the RDR implementation that causes us concern. Like many policy issues, we are working across the industry to come up with a solution that works for all parties.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “still a lack of clarity”

    Undersatement of the week.

  2. Confused?
    You will be!

  3. So what exactly are the FSA’s concerns? That intermediaries will be tempted by the commission available to encourage the topping up of an existing contract instead of advising the client to invest in a new one? What is the scale of this possible risk of consumer detriment? What research has the FSA done and what data has been gathered as a result? May we see it? May we discuss it? May we set it in context appropriate to the degree of possible consumer detriment?

    Assuming that most clients would not wish to make further investments into a product unless it has served them well to date, is it a major issue? Or is it just a minor molehill out of which the FSA is determined to make a mountain?

    Is the best way to address this perceived risk the imposition of a total ban on commission payaments from existing products, with all the expensive and complicated systems changes this will impose on providers? No, of course it isn’t.

    Is there a simpler and easier solution? Almost certainly. Just require providers to rebate directly to clients any commission over and above whatever amount is agreed between the adviser and his client ~ HIS client. Not the FSA’s client, not the provider’s client, but the adviser’s client, a relationship into which the FSA seems more than ever determined to stick its unwelcome oar and create needless trouble and expense for all concerned.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm