View more on these topics

Track-seat driver

Barclays Global Investors has introduced the BGI Multinational fund to

track the FTSE Global 100 index, which comprises 100 of the world&#39s leading


The panelists agree that the fund fits into the market well. Macfarlane

says: “The fund fits well into the index-tracking stable of funds currently

offered by many compan ies. It is better than many of the traditional

tracker funds on offer as it provides a more global investment spread.”

Flemming says: “This fits in well to what has been a niche market and

which is now growing.”

Buswell takes a more cautious view. He says: “This is yet another tracker

fund. First it was the FTSE, then the New York stock exchange, then a

combination, then the Eurostoxx and now we have the multinational tracker.

Unfortunately, it is so heavily weighted towards the US that I am not sure

it will do what it is supposed to do.”

Looking at the types of client for whom the fund is suitable, Bruce says:

“This is for clients who perhaps have experience of investing in the UK but

who have not yet ventured overseas. This product would be a good first-time

international fund for such an investor.”

Macfarlane says: “This is for clients who are looking for global exposure

to a portfolio of the world&#39s biggest and most successful companies. It

could also be for first-time investors or as a core holding within bigger


Flemming says: “This could be for a safety-conscious client who wants to

get involved in the international market, perhaps for the first time.”

Buswell thinks this fund is suitable for investors who do not have a

global fund within their portfolio.

Turning to the marketing opportunities that the product provides,

Macfarlane says: “This fund will be an attractive holding in many

portfolios and should be especially attractive as an Isa-wrapped fund. Many

clients will be familiar with household names within the fund such as

Microsoft and Coca-Cola.”

Bruce says: “This is suitable for most types of investors. It is a

well-presented fund with low charges.”

Buswell says: “This may capture the imagination of the investor who wants

to say: &#39My money is invested in the world&#39s top 100 companies.&#39 Quite why

he would want to say that is beyond me but someone undoubtedly will.”

Looking at the fund&#39s strong points, Macfarlane says: “The fund, while

passive from a management point of view, should nevertheless be dynamic. As

tomorrow&#39s leading companies move into the Global 100 index, those whose

days are done are replaced. The fund has the Isa wrapper, competitive

charges and provides for global diversification.”

Flemming says: “Its main useful point is its breadth of scope, covering

different companies in different areas, so it is not limited to just the

one spot in the market as narrower funds are.”

Bruce says: “The fund has removed the risk from companies that are truly

international and are not tied to any one economy. It also has a good

geographical spread and lower initial and annual charges than some funds.”

Turning to the drawbacks of the fund, Buswell says: “This is a rapidly

changing world. Probably 10 of the companies mentioned in the literature

are no longer in the top 100. Then, of course, there are mergers and

acquisitions constantly taking place within these companies.

“Also, the fund is so heavily weighted in the US that, should a major

correction in the market take place, it would have an almost uniform effect

on all the other companies whose principal market is the US.”

Flemming says: “Its one drawback is the potential volatility of the

international markets. We only have to remember what happened to Japan and

the Far East a few years ago and the effect that that had on the market.”

Bruce says: “It is restricted to FTSE Global 100 companies. As most of

these have already made it to the top, further outperformance may be


Macfarlane points out that clients would have to be aware of possible

currency risks due to the geographical spread.

Commenting on the investment strategy of the fund, Macfarlane says: “The

fund is passive, with the investment strategy being determined by the

capitalisation of the world&#39s biggest multinationals.”

Buswell says: “Basically, there is no strategy. Barclays, like many other

companies before it, is relying on the expertise or investment strategy of

the individual companies rather than its own strategy.”

Bruce says: “The strategy may not suit everyone but, by only investing in

big multinational household names, risk may be reduced. However, the upside

may also be restricted by only investing in companies that have already

made it.”

The panel are divided in their opinions of the company&#39s reputation. Bruce

and Flemming have not had a lot of experience with BGI and are unable to

comment but Macfarlane regards the company as having an excellent

reputation. Buswell says: “BGI has a solid if unspectacular reputation.”

Commenting on BGI&#39s past performance,Buswell says: “To be frank, this is

not particularly inspiring. I wish that banks would stick to banking and

leave investing to investment companies.”

However, Macfarlane says: “Its investment past performance record is above

average across many funds.”

Looking at the main competition to the fund, Macfarlane points to the

Mercury Global Titans fund.

Buswell says: “Most of the major investment companies have global funds

which consistently outperform most of the banks. I cannot see people being

drawn away from those companies with proven track records to go with this

particular fund instead.”

The panel agree that the charges and the commission are fair and reasonable.

All the panelists regard the product literature as attractive. Flemming

says: “It is easy to read, simple and easy to understand.” Bruce comments

that it is clear, easy to follow and user friendly.

Buswell says: “Actually, for a bank, it is clear, concise and easily


Buswell sums up by saying: “Perhaps I am thinking the unthinkable here but

I do wish that banks would stick to banking, investment companies to

investing, building societies to savings and mortgages and insurance

companies to insurance.

“The one-size-fits-all scenario that everyone seems to be attempting is

only succeeding in producing small number of very large but very aver age


Broker Panel

Alan Buswell, Proprietor, Glenburn Financial Services,

John Bruce, Partner, Gillies and Campbell Independent Financial Advisers,

Bruce Macfarlane, Partner, Capital Trust Financial Management,

Derry Flemming, Derry Flemming Consultants


Housing market cools in London and the southeast

A survey from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors reports that housing prices are cooling off in London and the southeast.In the three months ending on March 31, the results indicate that while prices still rose, they did so at a slower pace than in the previous period. Just over 60 per cent of those […]

What now for mutual firms?

The mutual status of insurers provokes feverish media speculation but theoffices themselves are more concerned with expansion and offering solidproducts.Three Scottish life offices – Scottish Provident, Scottish Life and, ofcourse, Standard Life – have been the subject of speculation.In all three cases, the arguments for and against demutualisation aredifferent.Life industry analyst Ned Cazalet stresses that […]

Is it too soon to cheer?

The sound of Champagne corks could be heard across the country as thesign-up date for the pension review passed but is the sign-up date reallyas simple as it sounds and a cause for celebration or merely anearly April fool?On August 3, 1999, the FSA announced that investors who wanted theirpersonal pension reviewed had to request […]

Property subsidence

Remortages are und^_erpinning new business and will become increas^_inglyimportant as the online challenge grows. The value of independent advice isstill recognised but IFAs will haveto work harder to maintain demand.Online competition threatens to cut profit margins further. The growingemph^_asis on remortages is combining with a greater preference fornon-branch distribution channels, according to research analyst Mintel.“This […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm