View more on these topics

Tory thinktank wants to keep door ajar for CTFs

Conservative thinktank Policy Exchange has called for the child trust fund to be retained in a bid to build a savings culture.

The Tories plan to scrap child trust funds for the majority of families. Only disabled children and the poorest third of families would receive the payments, saving the Treasury £300m a year.

But in a report last week, Policy Exchange says policies such as the child trust funds introduce more people to saving and create a base to increase the amount people save.

The report says: “The CTF will mean that every young person has a financial asset. It should improve financial education, meaning when the child turns 18, they can continue with their savings habit, and use other kinds of savings products, such as Isas.”

The thinktank has proposed a framework in which CTFs are one of four “jam jars” to save into.

The first jar would be for long-term savings and could include automatic enrolment into the National Employment Savings Trust. Policy Exchange is keen on the idea of being able to unlock some of the Nest funds in a specified emergency.

The Conservatives have also voiced their support for the early-access model.

The second jar would be to save for a big purchase, such as the deposit on a house. Policy Exchange says the tax-free Isa allowance of £10,200 could contribute to this.

The third jar would be for a regular annual treat such as a holiday or Christmas and this could involve the saving gateway, the matched savings scheme.

The fourth jar would allow people to save for their children and invest the free CTF voucher. The thinktank would like to bring forward the extra payment made by the CTF scheme once a child reaches seven so it is paid out at birth instead.

The report says: “To some degree, people’s choices of jam jars will be self-selecting. Some people might not ever save up for a house deposit and may just save for Christmas.

“Behavioural economics have shown that we commonly divide accounts into different objectives in this way. People are likely to focus just on the savings goals that are important to them. Presenting the policy in this way will offer people simple choices and emphasise the importance of saving. There will be a product for everyone.

“To deliver the political argument of why saving can and should apply to everyone, the focus should fall on the maxim that money may not bring happiness but it can bring the freedom to make choices.”

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says: ” It would be lovely if the next Government leaves child trust funds and Isas in place because, if we could just see a bit more consistency, I think that would encourage more people to save for the future.”


Second best

Chris Salih analyses the reasons behind the below-par returns on Skandia’s UK best ideas fund

Head of sales Turtle quits at Hornbuckle Mitchell

Hornbuckle Mitchell director and head of sales for London Elaine Turtle is leaving the Sipp provider. Turtle is understood to be one of Hornbuckle’s top salespeople. She is planning to travel for around a year before looking for another role. The firm has not confirmed whether she will be replaced. Managing director David White says: […]

Looking back at 2015

By Fiona Tait, Pensions Specialist 2015 was quite a year for pensions. Change, more change, and proposed changes to the changes. The Spring Budget – pre-election plans With everything that has happened since, it is hard to remember what happened in March. Following on from the bombshell of the 2014 Budget, the Chancellor confined himself […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Richard Brown, Managing Director, Moneynotion Limi 18th February 2010 at 3:16 pm

    I have never seen the point in the CTF, other than as an expensive vote winner.

    We have our priorities completely wrong. State provision for 16 year old girls who get pregnant to get a place of their own to live away from their parents, CTF and other benefits for people who CAN help themselves stop us giving a decent pension to those who can’t.

    No-one can help getting old and the infirmity it perforce brings. Yet we condescend to the aged by spending huge administrative costs giving them fuel allowances, bus passes and cheaper this and that, when I am pretty sure most old people would prefer to hold up their heads and pay their own way.

    The Conservatives can scrap the CTF for all as far as I am concerned!

  2. Just shows the Conservatives are as nuts as the others.

    Aprt from the fact we cannot afford to give money away and that most likely many will probably use the money to buy their first car when they are age 18.

    How does “free money” encourage saving ?

    They are all completely nuts and seem to be trying to buy any vote they can get with taxpayers money !!

    Time for a complete change if you ask me.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm