View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: The impact of Brexit on taxation

Tony WickendenLeaving the EU would free the UK from tax commitments, but mirroring those obligations might be a condition of a deal

Brexit and taxation are not two subjects mentioned in the same breath that often. But as a leader of a support business for the financial planning sector, it’s a combination I thought was worth giving a little thought to. To start with, and self-evidently, any type of Brexit that doesn’t incorporate the same level of freedom of services as that available to a “full member” will inevitably be detrimental to the UK’s financial sector.

Most seem to agree that, at best, it is likely to be some time before any “compensatory” deals on services outside the European Union are done.

Be that as it may, good financial planning should incorporate a degree of anticipation, and some appropriate “hedging” where there is uncertainty over potentially material changes.

The outcome of the Brexit debate remains the very definition of uncertain. In the words of The Clash, “should I stay or should I go”?

Tony Wickenden: Proposed rule changes for ‘disguised employees’

Regardless of your own particular views on the rights and wrongs of Brexit, it cannot be denied that some form of it is more than a distinct possibility. So what would the likely impact on direct taxation be and what, if anything, can be done  now to hedge against the anticipated outcomes?

Limited tax harmonisation
First, it’s essential to recognise that whatever the aspirations of some hard-line supporters of a fully confederate Europe, there has been very little progress towards EU tax harmonisation among member states. Any such change needs the unanimous approval of all members, and the UK has not been alone in consistently opposing any form of harmonisation. There have been some moves towards the establishment of a common consolidated corporate tax base, but we are not really any nearer to that.

“Approximation” of the tax codes between member states is about as far as we have got. Since the early 1960s, in relation to direct taxation, the commonly understood objectives among member states have been eliminating double taxation, enhancing co-operation between national tax authorities and stepping up efforts against cross-border tax avoidance. These objectives have been gradually broadened to include:

  1. Eliminating all other tax obstacles hindering cross-border business activities and investments within the single market;
  2. Enabling co-operation between tax authorities to exchange information and assist one another in recovering tax claims;
  3. Countering tax evasion and tax strategies that attempt to reduce liabilities by misusing rights under EU law.

However, EU member states, in determining their own tax codes, do have to ensure there is no “tax discrimination” between citizens and businesses across the bloc.

For a number of years, individuals and companies have challenged national direct tax provisions allegedly hindering the exercise of fundamental freedoms, in particular the freedom of establishment, the free movement of workers and
the free movement of capital.

National tax provisions of both home and host member states have regularly been found by the European Court of Justice to be in breach of EU law, creating a process of “negative integration”, specifying which direct tax provisions member states should not introduce or maintain, and obliging them to amend or repeal such provisions.

The ECJ has consistently stated that, although direct taxation falls within the competence of member states, they must exercise that competence consistently with EU law. Overall, ECJ case law has constrained member states from using direct taxation to create differential treatment between domestic and comparable cross-border situations within the EU, thereby taking important steps towards creating a level playing field across the single market.

Tony Wickenden: Tax intervention on diverted profits

Once outside the EU (if that is what happens), we will, on the face of it, be freed from needing to comply with alignment (the core freedoms), and the principle of equivalence and non-discrimination. However, as part of a post-Brexit deal with the EU, it is likely that some mirroring of the commitments of member states will be a condition of any agreement.

Low-tax zone
Subject to that, we will almost certainly continue to offer a low-tax zone – especially for businesses – as a material attractor to the UK. The current corporation tax rate of 19 per cent, set to fall to 17 per cent from 1 April 2020, is a great example of this.

Of course, a change of government and a radical change in taxation policy, possibly linked to a more radical redistribution philosophy, may (indeed, almost certainly would) militate against this continued benign state, in relation to corporate tax rates in particular.

More time to govern?
An indirect result of resolving the interminable Brexit process will be that the government will have a little more time to actually govern.

One might expect, as a result, to see greater consideration given to, and possibly legislation relating to, some aspects of the tax and financial planning process, for example pensions and estate planning. Stranger things have happened.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection (a St James’s Place Wealth Management group company). You can find him Tweeting @tecconn

Recommended

Robin Powell: Is asset management a wealth creator or extractor?

In discussions about post-Brexit Britain, the City understandably looms large. Financial services is one of our biggest exports. But just how much value does it actually add? On the face of it, the value appears to be substantial. According to PwC, the financial sector employs 3.4 per cent of the UK workforce, generating 6.6 per […]

Vertical integration still on the table for Australia after parliamentary backing

A key parliamentary committee has rejected legislation to end vertical integration in the Australian financial services industry. The Senate Economics Legislation Committee within the Australian parliament has today knocked back the proposed legislation, which could effectively have outlawed cross-selling. Committee chair Jane Hume says current legislative protections are “sufficient enough to ensure money held in […]

Matthew-Pete-2012-700.jpg
3

Pete Matthew: Empathy is a superpower

I wish it was possible to bottle up empathy. If it could be administered by injection to anyone aspiring to be a financial adviser, many of the industry’s biggest issues would be solved at a stroke. Anyone who thinks financial advice is primarily about money is an idiot. We are paid handsomely to help people […]

Pensions Dashboards around the World

Steve Webb’s latest policy paper British savers risk being left in the ‘slow lane’ unless the UK Government takes a more active role in ensuring the successful delivery of a Pensions Dashboard. The report, ‘Pensions Dashboards around the World’, coincided with a major conference that was held on Monday 16 May and brought together experts […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Patrick Schan 28th May 2019 at 5:21 pm

    Yes, just one more complexity to embrace or reject, could be on the horizon.

    Of course many like the idea of the business friendly, off the coast of Europe, tax paradise with low corporation tax and pitiful wages for employees that will have even fewer workers rights.

    Personally I would like people that are keen on the above to stuff that concept somewhere the sun doesn’t shine.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com