View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: HMRC’s ‘game changer’ approach to tax avoidance

wickenden

Over the past few articles I have looked at what is required for the issue of follower notices, accelerated payment notices and partnership payment notices.

All these are intrinsic to HM Revenue & Customs’ strategy for getting tax from those who have adopted what, in its view, amount to aggressive tax avoidance schemes without having to wait for the outcome of the relatively long- winded assessment and appeals process. This strategy is widely regarded as a bit of a game changer, and it is where a lot of the recent publicity over tax avoidance has been focused, especially with the recent failure to have the payment notice process ruled invalid by judicial review.

Just to be clear, though, the APN process does not deny the right to appeal against an assessment. If you have a notice issued then the tax ‘at risk’ will ‘rest’ with HMRC pending the outcome of the appeal, not with the taxpayer.

The HMRC rationale for this is “it’s only fair” and “goes with the territory” that you have to accept if you enter into a scheme that has a Dotas reference number.

Of course, the recent proposals and draft regulations to expand the number of schemes for which Dotas reference numbers can be issued are a really important part of this strategy to increase the number of potential APNs – generating transactions that are in the pipeline.

The ability to “get tax in” on account and ahead of the appeals process being considered has understandably been seen as highly newsworthy. This is especially so as a number of relatively rich and relatively famous people have been affected.

But despite all this interest in advance payments, it is important that financial planners and their clients do not lose sight of the much bigger picture in relation to the relentless HMRC fight against what it sees as unacceptable, aggressive tax avoidance. ‘Avoidance and legal interpretation’ does after all contribute about 24 per cent of the £35bn tax gap.

A really good reference point is the Government policy paper on tackling tax evasion and avoidance. It has a very strong focus on evasion, especially offshore, as this is a strong contributor to the tax gap. But it also sets out a very clear and multi-faceted strategy to combat domestic tax avoidance. Yes, it was issued under the Conservative-LibDem coalition but it was issued in March and its contents remain, as far as we know, very much part of the policy of this current Government.

In the section on domestic avoidance (not an explanation of how to avoid doing the washing up), HMRC states that over a relatively short period the strategy has transformed the way avoidance is tackled.

Rather than just acting to block individual abuses, the radical new approach has altered the underlying economics of avoidance by accelerating the payment of disputed tax and stemmed the supply side by acting against the highest-risk tactics of avoidance promoters.

These actions have been a significant leap forward, but more can be done.

Intelligence-led approach

In the March Budget, the coalition announced it would introduce a range of new measures for those who persistently enter into tax avoidance schemes that HMRC defeats.

Avoidance is the preserve of a persistent minority. The measures that ministers have taken already are working to reduce that minority. Among those that remain, there are some who avoid tax again and again, often using more than one scheme each year, knowing that some will fail but hoping that one will not.

The Government also announced it is asking the regulatory bodies that police professional standards to take a firmer lead in setting and enforcing clear professional standards for those who help and promote avoidance. This is to protect the reputation of the tax and accountancy profession as a whole as well as for the greater public good.

No-one can be in any doubt about the level of official commitment to stamping out what is thought to be aggressive avoidance. The days of relying on the long-winded process of litigation have long gone.

That is not to say litigation has ceased to be part of the anti-avoidance strategy. It has just been substantially supplemented by publicity (naming and shaming) and legislation, both in the shape of targeted anti-avoidance rules and the general anti-abuse rule.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection

Recommended

Tony Wickenden: Tax avoiders take notice

Last week I wrote about partnership payment notices and the failure of a challenge to their issue by way of judicial review. PPNs are the partnership version of accelerated payment notices, which are, of course, a fundamentally important part of HM Revenue & Customs’ drive to improve cash flow. And a pretty impressive drive it […]

Ministry-of-Justice-MoJ-500x320.jpg
2

Lawyers slam Govt plans to charge for tax appeals

Lawyers and accountants have attacked Government plans to charge individuals who appeal decisions made by HM Revenue & Customs. The Law Society warns the proposals to cut costs in the judicial system both undermine access to independent rulings and make the tax office too powerful, the Financial Times reports. A Ministry of Justice consultation suggests […]

When will US rates rise?

By Felix Wintle, Investment Director & Head of US Equities The most recent communication from Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen has put the market’s sights on September as the most likely month for the first rate rise. This is due to the stronger than expected economic data of late, particularly in employment and housing, which […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It is a great article about HMRC getting to grips with something that is legal ( tax avoidance ) and calling it “aggressive tax avoidance” so they can go at the naughty perpetrators with venom ,reassuring the public that they are doing a good job. The problem is they are as usual leaving the real criminals alone, the large corporates who play politics and threaten to leave the UK or move their head offices if they are asked to pay more than they ( the corporates ) want to pay. When successive UK governments say the “Uk is open for business” what they are really saying is “don’t worry about the Corporation Tax rate , we won’t make you pay it”. Now if HMRC made these corporates “pay full due on account” and leave them to then decide to defend or not I would show more respect. The fact is even with legislation in place to do this, they don’t cos the “Uk is open for business”

    The sad fact is that the capitalist system has grown into a beast which thrives on low wages to uneducated immigrants in countries which turn a blind eye to corporate taxes.

Leave a comment