View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: HMRC ups the ante on payment demands


Last week I looked at the phenomenon that is the follower notice – one of the very effective ways that HM Revenue & Customs has at its disposal to get money into its accounts earlier. I am going to look at the fundamentals of the more well-known HMRC cashflow generator, the accelerated payment notice.

Accelerated payment notices require the taxpayer to pay any tax in dispute to HMRC on account in advance of the conclusion of their tax enquiry or tax appeal. You can see why HMRC loves them. And it has been very very successful in using them.

An accelerated payment notice may be issued if tax is being disputed (that is, there is an open enquiry or appeal in process) and:

  • a follower notice has been issued;
  • the arrangements have been notified to HMRC under the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes rules (note that HMRC has published the Dotas numbers of those schemes to which it intends to issue these notices which will be under continual review); or
  • the arrangements are the subject of a General Anti-Abuse Rule counteraction notice

The taxpayer has 90 days to make representations to HMRC if they believe the accelerated payment notice is not valid. However, there is no appeal procedure once HMRC has confirmed the validity of the notice. This leaves a judicial review into HMRC’s decision to issue the accelerated payment notice as the only potential remedy and, since the threshold for judicial review is high, such a challenge is likely to be rare.

Making representations will delay the imposition of the payment as HMRC needs to consider these before confirming or revoking its decision. Once the taxpayer has received HMRC’s final decision, they have a further 30 days to pay the disputed tax on account to HMRC.

Once the issue of an accelerated payment notice has been confirmed by HMRC, the taxpayer has no option but to pay the disputed tax to HMRC on account by the date specified. If the taxpayer does not make the payment by the due date they will incur a penalty of 5 per cent of the disputed amount and, if that sum remains unpaid at five and 11 months following the due date, additional penalties of the same amount will arise on each of those occasions.

It is the accelerated payment notice that has had the greatest prominence in the press through their issue to many well-known public figures in relation to their involvement in tax-reducing and avoiding schemes, including those purporting to generate tax losses or save tax through film schemes. And therein is another very important and effective component in the HMRC drive against aggressive tax avoidance – naming and shaming, of both individuals and companies.

The follower and accelerated payment notice rules are modified specifically for partnerships to reflect that:

  • partnerships typically have a representative member that will act on behalf of the partnership as a whole;
  • the tax arrangements in dispute may be both at the partnership level (for example, whether the partnership is carrying on a trade) and the individual partner level (for example, whether interest is deductible on a loan to acquire a partnership interest) and follower notices and accelerated payment notices can be issued accordingly; and
  • many of the tax avoidance schemes for which follower notices and accelerated payment notices are likely to be sent will involve partnerships

Where corrective action is not taken by the partnership as a whole, any follower penalty which arises will be the responsibility of each partner of the partnership by reference to their appropriate share (broadly, their share of profits or losses of the partnership).

The legislation does not make this a joint and several liability. But since corrective action in relation to a partnership dispute can only be taken by the representative member, an individual partner may find themselves liable for their share of a follower penalty even though they may have wanted to take the corrective action but the majority of partners have decided not to.

All of this has happened and been implemented relatively quickly. The challenge of the judicial review involving three partnerships; Ingenious Film Partners 1 and 2 and Ingenious Games, has failed. The process is a reality and many will be touched by it.

It brings us back to my frequently quoted mantra for financial planners in this new world: “Boring is the new exciting”.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection



Tony Wickenden: HMRC fends off legal challenge on tax avoidance

There has been another interesting and important development in relation to HM Revenue and Customs’ relentless drive to close the tax gap. Of course, it is in the area of tax avoidance: specifically, the part of its strategy that sees it getting the tax “early” from those who have entered into what it believes to […]

HMRC to pursue ‘aggressive’ tax avoidance scheme

HM Revenue & Customs says it will pursue the promoters and users of an “aggressive” tax avoidance scheme that could cost the Treasury “tens of millions” in lost national insurance payments. The BBC reports the scheme offered by recruitment firm Anderson Group exploits the Government’s employment allowance, which was introduced last year. The BBC secretly […]


Major parties accused of using ‘made up’ tax avoidance figures

Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat politicians are using “made up assumptions” of increased revenue generated by targeting tax evasion and avoidance, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Tackling tax evasion and avoidance has proved a huge part of this year’s election campaign since HSBC was found to be aiding clients of its Swiss private […]


FSCS reviews film partnership advice claims

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has begun reviewing “complex” tax dodging claims against advisers. The lifeboat fund says it has received a number of compensation claims in relation to advice to invest in schemes linked to investments such as film partnerships or environmental plans. Because the arrangements were primarily unregulated collective investment schemes, the FSCS […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The real issue is you pay up front. The HMRC then assesses if the tax is actually due, all in it’s own time.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm