View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: Conversations you need to be having on dividend tax changes

Tony Wickenden

With all the (quite understandable) concentration on pension reform it is not surprising to see the massive change to dividend taxation, taking effect from 6 April, has gone a little under the radar. Here is what we know about it:

  • The abolition of the dividend tax credit and the consequent end to the need to gross up the net dividend received to work out the tax on it, then to deduct the tax credit to work out the actual tax payable on the dividend
  • The first £5,000 of dividends being tax-free for all
  • The 7.5 per cent increase in the effective rate once you have exceeded the £5,000 allowance. By “effective rate” I mean the rate of tax found by expressing the tax actually payable by the investor as a proportion of the net dividend received, for example, 25 per cent for higher rate taxpayers currently
  • Basic rate taxpayers being no worse off under the new rules (though there will be no basic rate “winners” from the change either).

But facts are one thing. What does it all mean? Well, it depends on the circumstances but HM Revenue & Customs believes 85 per cent of dividend-receiving taxpayers will be better off under the new rules. Given the “unconditional” £5,000 tax-free dividend allowance, that seems a reasonable statement. But the change is estimated to generate £2bn of extra tax.

So where is it coming from? A good guess would be owners of small and medium-sized enterprises paying themselves by dividends (that exceed £5,000 for basic rate taxpayers and over £21,667 for higher rate taxpayers) instead of salaries.

So what does this mean for advisers? Well, in the face of such a fundamental change, they have a responsibility to engage with all their SME-owning clients and all investor clients with investments beyond pension and Isa wraps.

SME owners

The key discussion for SME owners will be how to extract funds from the company in the most tax-efficient way. Dividends are still likely to be the most effective way, in terms of tax and National Insurance, to remove funds from a company after 5 April, just not quite as attractive as they are under the current rules.

Unsurprisingly, given the dividend tax change does not “kick in” until the next tax year, some SME owners and their advisers may be considering making an early (2015/16) dividend declaration. In making the decision you should remember that, although you will secure a lower effective tax rate (assuming you are not a basic rate taxpayer), you will also bring forward the tax payment date in respect of the dividend to 31 January 2017 (from 31 January 2018), assuming it would have been otherwise declared in the 2016/17 tax year.

You should know the deduction of a dividend to avoid next year’s higher tax rates will not be caught by any anti-avoidance or anti-forestalling provisions. HMRC has even planned on receiving tax early because of such actions. After all, good tax cashflow is something that HMRC likes.


For investors there will be an interesting need to re-assess the choices beyond pension and Isa wrappers. Should investments be held “unwrapped” as collectives or “wrapped” in a UK/offshore bond to secure the optimum tax outcome?

There is no easy answer, as it depends on the facts, but the adviser needs to model the future to ascertain the course most likely to deliver the optimum outcome and previous decisions on how to extract funds from a company may need to be reviewed.

Fundamentally, no one can really know whether the wrapped or unwrapped decision will turn out to be the right one by delivering the optimum after-tax outcome. Because the future is essentially uncertain, a process of wrapper allocation based on a range of reasonable probabilities has to be worth considering.

To do this you would simply model (using an appropriate tool) a range of reasonable “futures” for the investor, factoring in a range of different tax, investment and timing variables that could be reasonably relevant. If you get a consistent wrapped or unwrapped outcome for each modelling exercise, then go with that. If you get different outcomes, then simply make a percentage probability assessment for each of the modelled futures and split the portfolio appropriately. Okay, that is a bit simplistic but you get the gist.

There are other ways but this one could reasonably defend against the risk of having all the eggs in one basket. You might even see it as a complement to the better-known process of asset allocation.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection



RBS makes £2bn loss amid conduct charges

Royal Bank of Scotland reported a £2bn loss in 2015 amid restructuring charges and costs linked to conduct failures. However, losses were lower than in 2014 when the taxpayer-backed bank hemorrhaged £3.47bn. Litigation costs included £600m more in provisions for the payment protection insurance misselling scandal, while restructuring costs came in at £2.9bn. When these costs […]


Aberdeen to slash fees on three funds

Aberdeen Asset Management is cutting the fees on three of its funds. In letters sent to investors, the asset manager says it will cut fees on the £166m World Emerging Markets Equity fund, the £1bn UK Enhanced Equity fund and the £1.1bn Foundation Growth fund. The annual management charge on the class A shares of the […]


Brokers at just 3 major networks can call themselves ‘independent’ post-MCD

Swathes of brokers will be unable to describe themselves as ‘independent’ from next month as major networks look to stop their intermediaries from advising on second charge loans. Research by Money Marketing sister-title Mortgage Strategy shows just three major networks will allow their brokers to advise on second charge loans and thereby maintain their independent […]


Jupiter assets hit £36bn as it readies fund launches

Jupiter Asset Management has reached £35.7bn in assets under management after seeing £2.1bn in net mutual fund inflows in 2015. The asset manager’s results for 2015, released today, show assets rose from £31.9bn at the end of 2014. The firm saw net inflows of £2.1bn to its mutual funds, up from £1.4bn in 2014. The […]


Guide: reporting to the Pensions Regulator — what and when?

Johnson Fleming has published a step-by-step guide demonstrating the importance of record keeping and reporting, and how it can ensure you operate a successful scheme. The guide takes you through some key questions you need to ask and identifies the information you need to obtain. The topics include: why you need to keep records and the benefits of doing this; registering your scheme; what information you need to record to ensure you meet the Pensions Regulator’s requirements; and what items need to be recorded and when.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The key point for me, is that investors/clients will we no change as they will continue to receive exactly the same net dividend post April, as they do so now, the sting in the tail being in the following tax year when they discover they have an extra dividend tax liability via self assessment and it’s too late to do anything about it!!! Also advisers should update professional connections because both trustees of discretionary trusts and executors/personal representatives of estates will NOT get the dividend allowance so will be worse off, the former by 10.8% on accumulated income. Also many pensioners and investors currently receiving say £7,000 of dividends each year, will not be doing self assessment of paying any tax on them, but from April they will have the responsibility to inform HMRC of their dividends so their PAYE coding can be reduced to reflect the dividends in excess of their dividend allowance! Just how many will realise this? All this at a time when HMRC is clamping down on tax completeness and timeliness, as the sea change to get (more) tax paid upfront gathers momentum……

  2. So not only does the regulator expect me to work even harder and more professionally than ever before the tax man expects me to take a pay cut for doing so and to take that on the chin alongside the increased tax liability on buy to let. Remind me why I became self employed in this market again?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm