View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: Budget buy-to-let investors could be disappointed


It is an understatement to say that this year’s Budget contained a few surprises. Without doubt the biggest for the financial sector and the country at large were the proposals to seriously relax the rules on withdrawing benefits from defined contribution registered pension schemes. 

Broadly speaking, the Government has made the following immediate changes to the current drawdown rules. For drawdown years commencing on or after 27 March 2014, the maximum capped drawdown income that can be taken in each drawdown year will be increased from 120 per cent to 150 per cent of the relevant annuity. 

It should be remembered that the legislation only sets out the maximum allowable capped drawdown income. It will, however, be for providers to decide whether to increase the income to this new maximum amount. When the maximum drawdown was increased from 100 per cent to 120 per cent of the relevant annuity rate from March last year, some providers did not immediately allow the drawdown income to be increased to the maximum (then 120 per cent) level permitted by the legislation.

So much for the immediate changes. It is the proposed April 2015 relaxation, permitting unrestricted pension fund drawdown regardless of “pot size”, that has grabbed the headlines.

In connection with this, there have been more than a few predictions of a potential flood of requests from “pension-disaffected retirees” to draw entire funds to invest into property with a view to generating rental income as a “pension”.

Apart from the potential extreme lack of diversification (in some cases) such a strategy could represent, there is also the obvious (but perhaps  overlooked) point that aside from the 25 per cent pension commencement lump sum tax-free cash, the remainder of the fund withdrawn would suffer tax at the “withdrawer’s” marginal rate(s) in the tax year of withdrawal.

If the investor had a fund worth £200,000, then £50,000 could be taken as tax-free cash. Say they had £10,000 of their basic-rate threshold left in the year of encashment (after reduction of the personal allowance to zero) , then the remaining £150,000 would generate tax of £2,000 on £10,000 and about £57,000 on £140,000, leaving a net sum to invest of £50,000 (PCLS) + £91,000 = £141,000.

Then there is stamp duty on the value of property at 1 per cent on a purchase of over £125,000 up to £250,000 –  that is about another £1,400 gone, aside from any other expenses associated with the purchase.

And then, if a property can be purchased (with the tax-reduced sum) with a net rental yield of, say, (a high) 5 per cent the effective yield on the original £200,000 that could have otherwise been used to buy an annuity or remain invested to draw down from would be lower than 3.5 per cent pa.

With a lower net rental yield (a function of property acquisition price and nominal rents available for the property being let) the net (pre-tax) yield could easily be lower than 3 per cent. The rent would be subject to tax at the landlord’s marginal rate(s). The dividends received by the pension fund from the equity portfolio would come with a tax credit but this would be non-reclaimable. Any income “drawn down” from the pension fund would, of course, be taxed in full as pension income.

Naturally, in comparing the likely overall return,  there is also the chance of capital growth in the property to take into account, subject to capital gains tax on realisation but “wiped out ” (for tax purposes with revaluation) on death. So, a potentially good idea in theory but, in practice, perhaps not so. Either way, advice will be essential.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection

Access accredited CPD, essential technical updates, business generation ideas and get answers to your case-related technical questions from our consultancy team through Techlink Professional. And bi-weekly client and professional connection e-mail content through Techlink Communicator.  Go to and click the Contact Us link at the top of the screen and then request your free trial of both services from the drop down menu. 


MB 700

Skandia to add cash Isa as it increases rates

Skandia is adding a cash Isa on its platform and increasing the rate of interest paid on cash from 0.1 per cent to 0.4 per cent. The move follows changes to Isas announced in the Budget which will see the annual Isa allowance increase to £15,000 from 1 July, and the ability to switch freely between cash […]


Is there a place for insurers in Osborne’s brave new pensions world?

Radical reforms of the pensions market announced in recent weeks are forcing insurers to fundamentally re-evaluate their business models, with analysts spotting opportunities alongside the market panic. First, Chancellor George Osborne announced the biggest shake-up to pensions since the 1920s, opening up new financial planning opportunities for advisers and their clients but sending the share […]


Holly Mackay: Aegon and Cofunds kick off new platform price war

With Cofunds announcing changes to its Sipp charges yesterday and Aegon introducing a cap on charges, we see a return to a focus on cost in the adviser platform market. Within the space of a few days we have seen the UK’s largest platform become sharply competitive on pensions as Aegon thrust the capped fee […]


CII handled 521 disciplinary cases in 2013

The Chartered Insurance Institute considered 521 disciplinary cases last year, reveals a report published today. The annual report of the CII’s Professional standards board shows this compares to 525 cases in 2012. The CII says a disciplinary case is one where it is alerted to a potential disciplinary issue. Of the cases identified in 2013, […]

Life begins at…

By Fiona Holmes, proposition communications manager Having reached a certain age (it’s the new 40 by the way), I’m having to come to terms with the fact that my peers and I aren’t as immune from illness or death as we’d like to think. That’s the problem with 30 being the new 20 and 40 […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. On the other hand, many of these people might have been purchasing annuities – in which case they might have been bequeathing a 5 or 10 year guarantee to their dependants, rather than bricks and mortar.
    An offsettable five year capital repayment loan could be useful too – with PCLS up front and four tranches of £37,500 in subsequent years, the chances are that tax might be nearer £22,000 than the £59,000 suggested (even disregarding interest offset).
    Just cat-skinning again.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm