View more on these topics

Tom Baigrie: Protection advisers need a trade body

Tom-Baigrie-Lifesearch-700x450.jpg

Writing in the context of the Financial Advice Market Review in a past column, I touched on the strength of our great financial services manufacturing businesses (in particular, life companies, banks and fund managers) versus the need for strong intermediation as the best way of ensuring such strengths are continuously improved. It got me thinking about how those two groups – intermediaries and manufacturers – might better collaborate so as to better serve consumers.

The present system is one of account management aimed at furthering competitive advantage. Its roots lie in the issues of very large businesses seeking to deal effectively with very small ones. The solution that evolved was that of helpdesks and account managers.

It helps at a micro level. Individual clients can benefit from intermediary intervention and manufacturers can earn competitive advantage through good service and personal product marketing. Its worst abuses have been stopped by the RDR and the FCA’s effective banning of inducements but, although it may do little harm now, it does not do any macro good. It offers no effective way for intermediaries to focus manufacturers on the product and service developments they know would improve consumers’ outcomes.

In the market I know best, protection, there is a host of good initiatives that struggle because they appear to manufacturers as threats or opportunities to seek competitive advantage. This  means they tend to be supported by manufacturers seeking competitive edge and blocked  or ignored by the others.

The innovative subject access request approach to gathering data is crippled because this lack of unity meant the medical lobby won the day over a split insurer lobby. Likewise, UnderwriteMe has taken ages to struggle into life. Even the excellent 7 Families collaborative marketing effort is forced to live hand to mouth as it seeks to break through into consumer consciousness.

Some time ago in this space I mentioned the idea of a trade body focusing on the needs of protection intermediaries.

The idea foundered because there are so few of us whose primary focus is protection. But the purpose remains unfulfilled: to work with life insurers to improve what we offer consumers.

Perhaps it is time to suggest replacing or at least supplementing the “account management” relationship between intermediaries and manufacturers with a new approach designed to encourage both to work together to improve what they do for consumers rather than just to gain an edge on competitors.

Because the independent end of the intermediary market is made up of so many disparate smaller firms, there is little positive encouragement any of them can generate.

All this would change if manufactures could have a well-supported intermediary body to work ideas up with so the risks of early adoption are much reduced.

Tom Baigrie is chief executive of LifeSearch

Recommended

Mark-Neale-at-office-in-2014-700.jpg
31

FSCS chief hits back over tax avoidance criticism

Last week Money Marketing printed an open letter from West Riding Financial Solutions managing director Neil Liversidge criticising the FSCS for considering claims against ‘victims’ of tax avoidance schemes. You can read his letter in full here. Below is FSCS chief executive Mark Neale’s response: Thank you for your personal letter of 11 September which […]

Boardroom-Business-Chair-Executive-Corporate-700x450.jpg
2

AJ Bell and L&G abandon Cofunds deal

AJ Bell will not acquire Cofunds after the firm failed to reach a deal with the platform’s parent company Legal & General, Money Marketing understands. Last week, Money Marketing revealed AJ Bell and L&G were in exclusive talks over a possible acquisition. However, a source close to the deal says the two parties have now […]

Guide cover

Guide: how to… communicate with your pension members

Effective communication of your pension scheme is a large part of getting auto-enrolment right. Delivering the same message to all employees is not necessarily the way to go. To assist you with the communication of your pension scheme, we have provided some key areas to think about, such as:

  • What to consider when segmenting your workforce
  • How to communicate to pension scheme members at the right time in their member lifecycle
  • What topics you should be discussing with your pension members
  • The new pension freedoms and the importance of communicating them

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. How about reviving the Life Insurance Association?

  2. Tom I agree entirely with you. To add to your points, the Account Managers these large manufacturers send out to talk to us have very little authority to do anything. Building a relationship should be much about action as it as conversation. If anything they simply become go-betweeners, and all that builds is frustration. As then I believe the only way to get this off the ground, however, is for us to fund it ourselves rather than ask the manufacturers for help. As then I believe the only way to get this off the ground, however, is for us to fund it ourselves rather than ask the manufacturers for help. As always I’d be happy to lend a hand / effort / hours in anyway I could.

Leave a comment