View more on these topics

Tom Baigrie: Time to drive home the benefits of protection

Tom-Baigrie-MM-Peach-700x450.jpg

In my last run out in this space, I urged the protection industry not to link its future to auto-enrolment but rather to urge the Treasury to acknowledge the economic value of what we do by allowing tax relief on pure protection premiums. 

Reading the comments that followed, I changed my mind. Not about making a whole new bureaucracy our route to market (that is indeed a pusillanimous cop out) but about the tax relief. We do not need to burden our broke exchequer with more pay-outs; we need to do our bit to rescue it by paying out more. We need to drive up the number of properly protected families who can claim by good private sector effort.

Analysis from The Syndicate research consortium gives a very clear pointer as to how to do that. It found certainty is what consumers want most and what drives action. We need to get out the loud hailer and boast of how we help those whose financial lives are destroyed by disability, illness or death. We need to evidence the uncertainty those risks can cause and the certainty with which our products sort them out.

Protection policies do pay out when they should. That truth needs to be trumpeted far more persistently. Another way to provide certainty is to demonstrate the effects of what we do. The Seven Families initiative does this in a radical way, by charting the difference a paid claim makes to a suffering family: few who experience that fail to become certain and convincing advocates of properly arranged protection. The challenges of the cynical are endless but consumers can edit that out very successfully if shown testimony from those who have benefited. Social media and more positively minded journalists can and will do this. 

However, the other side of the coin has to be radically addressed as well. Any insurer rejecting a claim needs to make sure that decision is utterly fair, not to their shareholders but to the claimant only. While proven liars can be called out, the possibly innocent, ignorant and confused are our fault. We should have got them through that state before we took their money. Insurers cannot hide behind a professional’s ability to make fools of those who briefly think about the world we think only about. In particular, the non-advised sale cannot become a claims reduction tool.

Any rejection based on that should set board room warning lights flashing in real time, for that way lies endless reputational damage and consumer uncertainty, and the consequent destruction of shareholder value. Rather such sales must have fewer and simpler questions and claims on them must enjoy a far lower burden of proof than hitherto. The higher premiums that approach will cause are an honest and better result than any raised risk of not paying out. 

As we seek to simplify our processes we need to have the wisdom to pay more claims and the courage to promote what we do. This will gain consumers certainty that protecting themselves and their family properly is a wise thing to do. 

Tom Baigrie is chief executive at LifeSearch 

Recommended

Ed-Miliband-Labour-Conference-700x450.jpg
29

Labour plans annual and lifetime pension allowance cuts

Labour leader Ed Miliband has laid out plans to cut pension tax reliefs in order to fund a £3,000 reduction in university tuition fees. In a speech today, Miliband promised to cut tuition fees from £9,000 to £6,000, with funding coming from a reduction in both the ceilings for tax-free annual and lifetime savings in […]

Wells Street Journal: Goldman Sachs’ new blackbox fund

Whoever says asset management is shrouded in secrecy clearly has never had the pleasure of reading an industry-standard factsheet. Here at WSJ Towers, broken windows are regularly repaired with the documents, such is their transparency. But it seems Goldman Sachs Asset Management didn’t get the memo. Surprisingly for a fund trying to attract investors, basic […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Tom, clearly and simply put.

    The future of Protection is in our hands not government. There are still those who would gainsay publishing claims data for various self-serving reasons. It’s like expecting someone to buy a car but refusing to tell them what the fuel consumption or 0-60 figures are.

    Neither is it about customer education to make it easier to sell. We are all responsible for helping customers understand the risks they run, see the need and making it easy for them to want to buy from someone they trust.

    As a mutual provider life is simpler without shareholders to justify claims ratios too. Put another way, every time we pay a claim we have a happy member not an unhappy shareholder

  2. A well written piece by Mr Baigrie.

    Much of the industry still see protection as ‘below’ them. I would argue that it is impossible to plan for tomorrow, until one has protected what one has today.

    Unfortunatley, protection needs to be ‘sold’, there I’ve said it!

    I don’t agree with you Mark Myers. Companies that have the best record on claims, tend to be proprietory. You make the mistake in assuming that the welfare of shareholders and customers are mutually exclusive.

  3. Interested Observer 19th March 2015 at 2:42 pm

    Hurray…. that’s it Tom. We need well known and respected people like yourself to lead from the front and take responsibility for doing our level best to distribute protection to as wide a population as possible. I do however feel that the government should also encourage, whether that be through publicity or tax advantages or other … after all it will likely reduce the burden of paying benefits. And lastly the product providers need to pay claims, but as importantly need to produce propositions that are more attractive to clients, some are doing this well. Change the Conversation : http://www.vitality.co.uk/conversation.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com