View more on these topics

Times investigation exposes Lloyds PPI complaints failures

Lloyds-Banking-Group-500x320.jpg

An investigation by The Times into Lloyds Banking Group has found contractors employed at its largest PPI complaint handling unit were taught how to “play the system” to the detriment of clients.

An undercover Times reporter went through the recruitment and training process to work as a PPI complaint handler at Royal Mint Court in London.

According to the paper, the reporter was told:

• Some bank salesmen had faked PPI information in agreements on loan sales; 

• Complaint handlers should effectively turn a blind eye to the risk of fraud; 

• The majority of customers would give up pursuing their complaint if the bank rejected it the first time around; 

• That a job as a PPI complaint handler could be “morally difficult”.

The investigation also found:

• A document which openly concedes that Lloyds has lost some crucial customer evidence; 

• Staff breached customers’ privacy under the Data Protection Act on some occasions; 

• That the entire operation was based on the assumption that Lloyds’ salesmen never mis-sold PPI. 

According to The Times, Lloyds said yesterday it had terminated its contract with Deloitte, the company responsible for running the complaints unit, after investigating “issues” at Royal Mint Court. Deloitte had run the operation since 2011.

Lloyds said Royal Mint Court employees were now being re-trained by a new supplier “in line with our policies and procedures”. 

The bank added: “Some of the comments made by trainers to your reporter are not endorsed by Lloyds Banking Group and we believe they do not reflect our high training standards or our policies. We believe the comments to be isolated and they are now being addressed.” 

Deloitte said that it could not comment on specifics because of client confidentiality, but added: “Deloitte’s role was to process PPI mis-selling complaints from Lloyds Banking Group customers who were sold policies by the bank, in accordance with policies and procedures.”

Recommended

RBS to announce 2,000 job cuts as Hester exits

Royal Bank of Scotland is set to announce 2,000 job cuts after chief executive Stephen Hester announced he will be leaving the taxpayer-owned bank later this year, according to reports. According to the BBC, the cuts are expected to be spread worldwide as the size of the investment division is reduced, with some job losses […]

RGA’s Jason Hurley to leave after 11 years with reinsurer

Reinsurance Group of America UK head of business development Jason Hurley is leaving the reinsurer after 11 years. Hurley is understood to be joining reinsurance broker Guy Carpenter as its managing director for UK operations. Prior to joining RGA in 2002, Hurley was a business development actuary at National Provident Institution, where he was responsible […]

5

Cofunds sees profits falls 17% to £6m

Legal & General-owned platform Cofunds has seen pre-tax profits fall 17 per cent to £5.9m in 2012, down from £7.1m in 2011. Assets under administration on the platform grew 33 per cent to £47.6bn, up from £35.8bn the previous year. Despite the growth, the firm’s accounts say directors see AUA as lower than expected although […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. As Deloitte are approved by the FCA as Skilled Persons they could re-employ them to look into the whole thing…

  2. RegulatorSaurusRex 11th June 2013 at 9:44 am

    “Lloyds said Royal Mint Court employees were now being re-trained by a new supplier “in line with our policies and procedures”.

    Unfortunately it is their policies and procedures that are at fault, not the contractors on £250 a day, they only do what they are told.

    All the banks are wasting a fortune on fending off complaints while the regulator refuses to order a full review, the FOS estimates that only 10% of all eligible complainants have already done so.

    “• The majority of customers would give up pursuing their complaint if the bank rejected it the first time around;”

    Is it any wonder that CMCs survive despite condemnation, even from Martin Wheatley who should, I repeat SHOULD, know better.

    With regard to forged documents, IFAs are just as bad.

  3. I want to know when Deloitte’s are actually going to be fined, after all isn’t there list of shame as long as any bank?

    Auditors for RBS.

    And now contractor for Lloyds PPI failures.

    Why is the FCA allowing effectively information only and execution only services which have been proven to fail, e.g. PPI.

    Surely somewhere along the line our industry needs to learn the lessons of the past.

  4. A CMC passed more or less the same information to the FSA a few months ago.

Leave a comment