View more on these topics

Think tank says financial advice key to long-term care reform

The think tank Policy Exchange has called for financial advice to be a key element of Government plans for reform of funding for long-term care.

In a new paper, “Careless – Funding long-term care for the elderly”, Policy Exchange also warns the Conservative’s pre-election proposal for an £8,000 voluntary levy to fund future long-term care would be inadequate and that the premium would need to be £40,000 in order to cover costs.

Policy Exchange says that many of the baby boom generation will enter old age with greater wealth than any group before them, but run out of money and end up falling back on the state.

The think tank says that financial advice is crucial to helping self-funders ensure they are able to provide for themselves throughout old age.

Partnership has previously campaigned for local authorities to help people access financial advice as a factor that could help address the long-term care funding gap.

Policy Exchange also suggests that if a voluntary premium were introduced, which is one of the ideas under consideration by the Government’s new commission on long-term care, it would need to be closer to £40,000, rather than the £8,000 figure the Conservatives suggested before the election.

The paper suggest that a hybrid model should be explored whereby the state guarantees some level of care but people are required to top this up up through insurance or annuity backed products.

Partnership managing director Chris Horlick says: “Partnership has campaigned actively for local authorities to sign-post people who have to pay for their own care to appropriately qualified financial advisers, and we are delighted Policy Exchange identify this as one of their three key recommendations.”

Partnership says that last year 130,000 people entered residential care in England. From this number 41 per cent, or 53,000 people had assets – including property – in excess of £23,250 which meant that they had to fund their own care costs. However out of this number only 7,000 received appropriate financial advice.

Horlick says: “It is accordingly no surprise that Partnership estimates that the cost to local authorities of self funders prematurely depleting their capital is nearly £1bn each year, in England alone.”

Horlick also supports the hybrid funding model and welcomes Policy Exchange’s call for greater clarity from the Government about what costs the state will meet and those that the individual will have to meet.

He adds: “We believe that greater certainty will play an important role in helping individuals prepare properly for their meeting their care funding needs.”

Recommended

Ed Jones’ clients set up Towry protest website

Disgruntled Towry clients have launched a website and a petition calling on the regulator to take action against the firm for delays in transferring their funds away from the company. The petition has been started by former Edward Jones clients who have been trying to transfer their assets away from the firm but say they […]

Incapital Europe launches digital growth plan

Incapital Europe is offering a digital growth plan to IFAs, in its second product launch since it bought out Blue Sky Asset Management three weeks ago. The group said the plan uses a ‘digital’ investment strategy to deliver a fixed growth return of 72 per cent at the end of its six-year term. This refers […]

Looking back at 2015

By Fiona Tait, Pensions Specialist 2015 was quite a year for pensions. Change, more change, and proposed changes to the changes. The Spring Budget – pre-election plans With everything that has happened since, it is hard to remember what happened in March. Following on from the bombshell of the 2014 Budget, the Chancellor confined himself […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 27th July 2010 at 3:31 pm

    I still don’t know why the government doesn’t take the simplest and almost certainly the most attractive route of encouraging private provision by way of granting tax relief on premiums to LTC insurance policies.

    Faced with a choice between parting with a lump sum of £8,000 or the cost of an annuity (yeuch) or paying £50 p.m. with tax relief to an insurance plan, which would you go for? Seems to me like a no brainer.

  2. Oh now suddenly IFAs are wanted! FSA are you listening?..or is this need to be filled by the Bank Assurance sector who will of course do a stirling job for clients.

    I think Julian’s idea is excellent. A bit like saving for a Pension. Tax releif on prefunded LTC insurance premiums would be perhaps one answer. Currently no one is providing prefunded care insurance because there was simply no demand. I listened to Partnership webcast yesterday on the subject and apparently they sold only 21 policies last year.

    The public are totally uneducated about Care Fees planning & they need help!

  3. There was a TV Programme on Care for the Elderly last night and there wasn’t an IFA in sight.

  4. We have been trying to attract IFA’s into the care advisory sector by offering them a one day business and personal development programme. It has been endorsed by Partnership and is attracting a healthy number of IFA’s who hadn’t considered advising this sector before. So maybe long term care will eventually become a “Great Opportunity” story for IFAs as well giving much needed help to society? Here’s hoping!

Leave a comment