View more on these topics

Think tank calls for savings-based unemployment welfare

A think tank has called on the Government to implement a new system of unemployment support based on compulsory savings backed up by guarantees from friends and family. 

The Social Market Foundation says the system would require all citizens to open a “lifecycle account” into which they would save a compulsory percentage of their monthly income while nominating three friends or family as guarantors.

If a person became unemployed these savings would be used to make up 70 per cent of previous earnings. If the savings were insufficient the person could then borrow a limited amount from the account to be paid back within two years.

If they could not pay the money back the guarantors would be held responsible to pay any outstanding balance.

Funds in the account upon retirement would be used to purchase an annuity in addition to the state pension.

The SMF says the proposal would restore a contributory principle to welfare.

SMF director and report author Ian Mulheirn says: “Decades of unimaginative welfare policy have shown us that when the state alone funds unemployment support, the system is plagued by problems: perverse incentives, meagre benefits and demeaning monitoring regimes. 

“Our national debate is bogged down in a fruitless argument about how to strike a balance between these apparently inevitable evils.”

Recommended

The Technical Quiz: 13 June

To help you to keep up with the fundamentals of tax, retirement and financial planning, try answering these questions. Answers below.

LEBC launches care fees advice service

LEBC has launched a care fees advice service designed to help people plan how they will pay for long-term care. According to the national IFA firm, some 53,000 people who go into care each year have to self fund.  The new service uses a cashflow tool to give customers a “strategic overview” of their funding […]

MM leader: The dangers and opportunities of D2C

As expected, the big providers are starting to reveal their direct to consumer ambitions. The targets and tactics being employed are different but the agenda is the same: how can firms take advantage of big changes to regulation and legislation, or demographic trends, to sell more of their products directly to consumers. Most propositions will […]

Pensions and retirement planning

Pensions and retirement planning Preliminary lessons from auto-enrolment Ian Naismith With feedback from the first roll-out of auto-enrolment coming in, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is now consulting on changes aimed at simplifying the process for employers. A key concern is around the administration, characterised as complex and time-consuming. This could cause major […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Moronic. 50% of the population of Sweden have a negative net worth. I doubt it’s much better here.

    This idea is predicated on an individual having surplus income prior to becoming unemployed. A big assumption.

    A negative income tax would restore the incentive to work, be able to be deployed immediately and still ensure a minimum level of income for the most vulnerable.

  2. So, for generation rent there is…

    Cost of living as a proportion of earnings higher than ever before, without any asset association.

    Student loan contributions of 9% on earnings above £16K, essentially = 41% in one form or another of taxation out in one form or another.

    And the Social Market foundation want to add another burden? Great idea.

    I think they underestimate the level of hand to mouth living in this country among those with lower paid jobs too.

  3. Imagine the serially unemployed or the long term unemployed. These are perhaps the greatest burden. How likely are they to save? Family or friends acting as guarantors? Obviously no one at the Social Market Foundation has much of a clue of Sociology.
    The people to whom they refer generally have friends and family in the same social bracket. Even if from a better off social bracket, who is going to be daft enough to act as guarantor?
    Will the person who is out of work need the permission of the guarantor before they go off to borrow money? If not then the guarantor is in effect writing out a blank cheque. I couldn’t imagine a dafter idea. But then I’ll lay odds that the authors of this report are:
    Not long out of University
    Are unlikely ever to have had a real job
    Have never experienced unemployment
    And come from the better off elements of society.

    Why do we take any notice of these numpties in their ivory towers?

  4. What is the application process for getting into a ‘think tank’? Clearly common sense wasn’t a requirement.

    I want to have a go at coming up with ‘radical’ ideas that could revolutionise this country.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com