View more on these topics

The star-spangled planner

Virtually anyone with a decent income or moderate wealth could benefit from the services of a financial planner.


By a financial planner, I mean someone with the expertise to produce a comprehensive financial plan for an individual household. This should cover the household&#39s financial goals, budget, risks and insurance, asset allocation, retirement plan and review of an estate plan.


Such detailed planning is unlikely to be met by advisers interested in commission on the financial products they sell.


A financial planner has a broad knowledge of areas such as tax planning, investments and estate planning but is unlikely to be an expert in any of these individual areas. Rather, the financial planner can help co-ordinate your financial planning with your accountant, stockbroker or law yer. The broad expertise that a professional financial planner possesses will help ensure that your financial goals are met and that areas of your financial life are reviewed.


Few people have the time, desire or expertise to do a complete financial plan for themselves. Hiring a planner will help you avoid expensive mistakes which could seriously damage your financial health.


It would not be difficult for a planner to find serious gaps in most household finances. Even individuals with expert knowledge in one financial field, such as investments, can overlook areas such as insurance or estate planning.


Saying that most people would benefit from using a financial planner is not to imply that there are not wide differences in abilities and costs among planners. If you are not careful, fees and commission could negate much of the benefit of choosing a planner.


These are the issues to consider when choosing a financial planner. The first step is to limit your search to someone who is competent in financial planning, such as a certified financial planner. The second step is to get recommendations from people you respect. Your aim is to find someone who meets your needs and who will look after your interests.


A problem that exists in selecting financial professionals is that what is in your best interest may fall a distant second to their interest in making profits.


The third question you need to ask is how the financial planner receives compensation and what this will cost you annu ally. You must consider fees, commission, transaction costs and the annual fees of the financial products they recommend. It is quite possible that after adding sales costs and management fees, the return that you receive from equities will not justify the risk.


Financial planners fall into two broad types: those who charge fees and those who charge a mixture of fees and commission. Which one will be best for you will depend on your particular circumstances.


If your only need is a comprehensive financial plan and you are willing to invest the funds yourself, then a fees-only financial planner who charges by the hour may be your best choice. If you want the financial planner to manage your money, then many fees-only planners move to an asset-based fee, normally 0.5 to 1.5 per cent of your assets.


In should be borne in mind that most financial planners put your money to work in a range of collective investment funds, which means you continue to pay the investment funds and additional management fee annually. Since evidence and theory suggest that none of these efforts will result in outperformance of an index -tracking fund, one might wonder why you should not go direct and save about 1.5 to 2 per cent in management fees. Plus, on average, you will have an investment fund that will outperform most professionals.


With commission-based financial planners, individuals run the risk that commission paid on financial products will add greatly to the cost of the financial planning. The risk of conflict of interest arises when the planner receives varying compensation based on which products they recommend. However, initial commission of 3 per cent on an investment fund might be cheaper than paying the annual 1.5 per cent fee to a fee-based planner.


You must compare all these costs when deciding which financial planner is best for you.


It is clear that knowledge on the client&#39s part is very important. While many people will spend a great deal of time shopping for a holiday, the decision of who to trust with their wealth is often made without as much thought.

Recommended

IFAs&#39 anger over rulebooks&#39 cost

The FSA has outraged IFAs by asking them to pay £250 for its new rulebooks.The charge for the books comes on top of annual fees of £845 per firm plus £340 for each adviser. There is also a joining fee of £1,750.The rulebooks will be available free on CD- Rom but many IFAs prefer reading […]

Barclays and Woolwich in talks

Barclays is looking to take over the Woolwich and more than double its share of the mortgage market to roughly 9 per cent. Merger talks, which would make Woolwich the mortgage arm of Barclays, are at an early stage. The announcement follows the Government’s recent green light for banking mergers, which ignored regulator Don Cruickshank’s […]

Plight of rural society branches

Former building societies which have converted to banks are more likely to close rural branches than their mutual competitors, says a report from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne.The report, The Contribution of British Building Societies to Financial Inclusion, commissioned by the Building Societies Association, concludes that societies are more likely to maintain a rural […]

Mortgage regulation system to run until 200

The system for statutory regulation of mortgages, which controversially excludes mortgage advice, looks set to run until at least 2003.The FSA regulation ofmortgages will not come into effect until autumn next year. After two years, it will be reviewed by the Government under plans announced as part of the Treasury response to the Cruickshank review […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment