View more on these topics

The new world of with-profits

If the FSA goes ahead with its proposals for disclosure to consumers, part of its wide-ranging with-profits review, changes will be required to the way that with-profits products are sold.

The effect will be on two levels – first, changes to the information to be provided at point of sale; second, changes in the way that IFAs go about selecting a product provider.

Information provision at point of sale

The FSA is proposing that two tiers of information be made available for consumers – core and supporting.

Core information must be provided to all consumers at the point of sale and would include details of the product&#39s features, investment mix, risk profile, a description of smoothing and the consequences of early surrender (for example, MVA position).

Supporting information is available on request and would include more detail on the management of the fund, for example, on the smoothing policy, factors that are considered when deciding on an MVA, and bonus policy.

All this material must be presented in clear English, possibly incorporating a range of prescribed terms.

Despite the increased information requirements, the FSA is intending to streamline delivery by requiring details to be carried in key features documents and with-profits summaries only.

Product providers will need to review and rewrite their product literature. This includes a review of key features and with-profits summaries (or producing them for the first time) and ensuring that other material uses clear English and consistent terminology.

IFAs will need to ensure that the resulting material is clear and accessible and that the appropriate information is provided to their clients.

Selecting a provider

Historically, with-profits has been seen as pretty much a generic investment vehicle – one fund being much like another.

As a result, selection has tended to focus on financial strength, past performance and product features and, in the case of bonds, allocation rates have often been a key determinant.

With the FSA proposals, much more information will become available to IFAs and consumers and, as a result, IFAs will need to look more closely at the fund they recommend.

The way that Oeics and Isas are sold provides a good indicator of the way that the selling of with-profits could change. Typically, they are selected by looking at past performance, the asset mix of a fund, its risk profile, the pedigree of the manager and the quality of the information available. Charges are a factor but not an overriding one. In essence, the process is about the fundamental quality of the fund and its prospects.

So how would the selection process for with-profits look in the future? Essentially, it will require a deeper understanding of a fund&#39s characteristics and should involve getting answers to the following questions.

What type of withprofits fund is it?

The FSA points out that the level of risk exposure varies between fund structures. It defines these risks as falling into two categories – investment and business.

Investment risk refers to exposure to the performance of the fund&#39s assets and all funds will be exposed to this type of risk.

Business risk refers to exposure to such things as expenses of management, mortality and profits (or losses) from other, non-with-profits, business activities.

Exposure to these risks will vary between funds.

There are basically three types of with-profits fund in the market, each with different risk characteristics which are as follows:

•90/10 proprietary company

Here, some of the business risks of the fund are borne by the shareholder(s). In return for bearing these risks, the shareholder receives a cut of typically 10 per cent of the cost of bonuses •Mutual company

This type of fund will be exposed to all the business risks listed by the FSA, because the company is owned by the policyholders and, as a result, there is no one else (that is, shareholders) to bear them.

These risks could include pension misselling, mortgage shortfall guarantees and set-up costs of non with-profits business activities.

•100/0 proprietary

Again, some risks are borne by the shareholders but their remuneration comes not from 10 per cent of bonuses but from profits made on product charges, which includes an explicit annual management charge on the fund.

Clearly, there is a need to establish the nature of a provider&#39s fund as this will have a bearing on the risk profile of the product recommended.

What are the charges?

Charges will have a fundamental impact on investment returns.

They fall into two categories – product and fund.

Product charges are usually clear, as in the amount of initial charge.

Fund charges are usually less obvious. It should be necessary to establish what the exact annual fund charge is and, more important, whether this could change in the future and under what circumstances Where is the fund invested?

This should cover the asset mix of the fund – how much is invested in shares, property, fixed interest, etc? – as well as information on exposure to other business activities.

How are investment returns achieved?

This requires information on the underlying fund returns as well as details on how this relates to net returns in the hands of investor – for example, after charges, tax and smoothing. Customers need to be reassured that there is a defined process for calculating their returns, it is not just up to the discretion of the company.

Can I understand this fund?

A simple but important question. The fact remains that with-profits is more complicated than other investment vehicles and consumers will have questions. How does smoothing work? When will MVRs apply? Explain the charges, etc. So advisers will need to be comfortable that they have picked a provider whose fund is explainable and who provides accessible information on it.

While the FSA is propo-sing additional documents,as noted above, the clarity of the material is up to each product provider.

The ability of providers to offer clear explanations of their fund will be driven by the underlying structure. For example, it is possible that the inherent complexity of a mutual fund will make a simple explanation of its operation harder toproduce.

The FSA proposals will bring about a change in the way that with-profits products are selected. Essentially, the adviser will need to pay much closer attention both to the type of fund and the extent to which product providers give clear, understandable and specific information.


Jackman and FSA in clash over T&C

The FSA board and its exam guru David Jackman are bel-ieved to be at loggerheads over the future of its training and competence regime. FSA head of industry training Jackman is believed to be extremely disenchanted with the regulator&#39s board because his exam review appears to have been put on the back-burner because of CP121 […]

Pension policy

Respected pension IFAs are concerned about the grim state of company pensions. They want FSA guidance on transfers to personal pensions. Take the case of someone not far from retirement and well down the scheme peck-ing order, who may face a scheme wind-up. Surely the FSA should devise a robust framework allowing advisers to advise. […]

Fof firms go on the road

Two of the UK&#39s leading fund of fund managers – Credit Suisse Asset Management and ABN Amro&#39s premier funds – are hitting the road this autumn to sell their message to IFAs. Credit Suisse is holding 17 events from October 14 to October 24 in venues across England and Wales, hosted by joint heads of […]

Matrix set for two hedge Fofs

Venture capital trust specialist Matrix Money Management is to launch two funds of hedge funds as part of its bid to become a one-stop shop for long/short investments. The Citadel market-neutral fund of hedge funds will be offered next month to IFAs. It aims to generate after-charge annual returns of 8-10 per cent with a […]

Is volatility dead? No, sell credit

There are several arguments that one could currently make for why credit markets look unattractive. These include signals that the US economy is in late cycle, the fact that corporate leverage has been increasing (with 2016 setting a record for the amount of global bond issuance), and that US high-yield default rates have risen considerably […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm