View more on these topics

The name game

Although now described as yesterday’s mistake, the announcement by Tomorrow that it will not allow a move to self-invested personal pensions could force a renaming in order to reflect its stance on this option, which was used to enable the sale of the original product. So how about Tomorrow Never Comes?

It’s clear that the firms taking over closed funds never even gave a second thought to treating customers fairly.

The FSA do not share their reduced communications approach.

In my own firm we were once able to request various projections but when the provider is owned by a closed fund company this is almost impossible. From the planner’s point of view it makes servicing these plans more expensive than their “current cousins”. As I once said in a speech at a pensions’ conference: “The more difficult it is to obtain the permutations in projections and/or asset allocation/performance, the easier it is to justify moving those assets to an alternative vehicle.”

It’s all very well for the regulator to make sweeping generalisations about using self-invested personal pensions v using stakeholder, but in most cases the move to Sipps enables the client to have the much-needed single view of projections and of asset allocation/performance.

What creates the issue for the regulator with Sipps is the lack of transparency in charges and that is where the concern really lies, coupled with the worry that Sipps are the financial equivalent of designer handbags. When I studied economics many years ago such items were referred to as “articles of ostentation”.

The latest term I spotted was “investments of passion”, that is, something you did not need, but still went out and purchased because of what it said about you. But I digress. The ability to obtain information easily has got steadily worse and we now escalate routine enquiries to formal complaints far too often.

The regulator needs to start keeping statistics on the response times for information enquiries. After all, disclosure does not cease at plan issue. This league table should be published and open to challenge by the IFA community.

It should be possible to obtain all information in under 30 days. I may exclude difficult calculations but asset allocation/performance should not take months to produce.

To advise clients on an ongoing basis, we need continual support from the insurers. It’s great to provide electronic valuations but if it cannot support detailed audit trails, then I have to question its real impact on moving the review process forward.

I would contend that effective review processes are the way to build a business of value but we need providers on the same page and that includes the Zombie companies.

They must not be allowed to operate a skeleton service and, if that fouls up their business model, then too bad. Treating customers fairly is not just for inception. It’s for the life of the contract and valid requests must be honoured.

When providers consider if a change of name is necessary, can I ask them not to bother? Let’s have a change in attitude instead. If we can raise the use of a professional financial planner to an “investment of passion”, then we will truly have arrived.

We have to generate that excitement, which means ensuring that our most effective human advertising boards – our satisfied clients – carry the message of the effect of financial planning far and wide. Let’s start the campaign as soon as possible.

Recommended

Less than half of CII members believe the RDR will improve industry

Only 42 per cent of Chartered Insurance Institute members believe the Retail Distribution Review will lead to a more professional financial services industry.A recent survey, conducted with over 800 of the CII’s members, found only 21 per cent believed the RDR would improve how consumers perceive the industry.The survey also found only 6 per cent […]

‘Govt set to agree compensation for pension victims’

Pension campaigner Ros Altmann believes compensation for the victims of collapsed schemes could have moved a step closer after she met with Department for Work and Pensions Secretary Peter Hain.Altmann says in a private meeting with several members of her Pensions Action Group on October 3, Hain and pensions minister Mike O’Brien agreed that the […]

Kirwan stays at ABI

Nick Kirwan is to remain as head of health and protection insurance at the Association of British Insurers on a permanent basis.Kirwan, who resigned from Scottish Widows in April, took over the role from Richard Walsh in June on a six-month consultancy basis pending a formal recruitment process but has now accepted the position permanently.Since […]

‘Clients not worried over independence if goals are achieved’

Thinc Destini director of wealth management Patrick Murphy has questioned the importance of the independent tag, saying he would not have a problem being tied to a single wrap platform.Speaking at Morningstar’s Investment Conference last month, Murphy said being a wealth manager is a pure financial planning role where clients are advised on their goals […]

Key themes for 2017

Capital Market Notes, December 2016 Dave Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management, assesses the accuracy of his 2016 outlook and provides his thoughts and outlook for 2017. Click here to read the full article

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment