View more on these topics

The Mig society

The Government wants to use Mig to spur lenders to help more first-time buyers, reports Paul Thomas

The mortgage industry is split on whether increased use of mortgage indemnity guarantee insurance will ease lenders’ concerns about lending at higher loan-to-values.

Mig is an insurance policy which compensates the lender if a borrower defaults on a loan. In the past, this type of policy has been used when lending to high LTV borrowers which tend to be first-time buyers who are seen as a greater risk to lenders. Migs have steadily declined since the 1990s.

Last week, housing minister Grant Shapps called together leading industry figures to discuss how more could be done to help FTBs. Mig was discussed as a way of creating an incentive for lenders to lend to FTBs.

Genworth Financial president of mortgage insurance for Europe Angel Mas, who attended the meeting, says it has been proved in the past that Mig encourages lenders to offer higher LTVs because it reduces risk to lenders.

Mas says: “International experience has shown that one way to incentivise banks in the past has been through mortgage insurance. If the lender takes out a Mig and is prudent, then everybody wins. But the regulator and the Bank of England must adapt to the reality that you can lend at higher LTVs, which is theoretically more risky, by having this private guarantee.”

Mas says in Italy, lenders use Mig to offset the risk of higher LTV lending and it means banks do not have to carry as much capital to back the loan because the risk is reduced.

He says: “In Italy, Mig is not compulsory but it provides an incentive, so the market remains open and banks have a capital advantage.”

Chadney Bulgin mortgage partner Jonathan Clarke says he is surprised that more lenders do not use Mig to provide protection against high- LTV lending. He says: “When I started in the industry, Migs were quite common. I am surprised lenders have not turned to them as a way of approving more 85 to 90 per cent LTV mortgages.”

However, Clarke says lenders could be struggling to get reasonably priced Mig policies in the current economic climate.

He says: “House prices have been a little bit wobbly and that, comb-ined with possible interest rates rises, might make the cost of Migs astronomical.”

The Council of Mortgage Lenders, which was represented at the meeting with Shapps by director general Michael Coogan, welcomes Mig being considered as a way of helping FTBs.

The CML says Mig has a role to play but it is wary of the industry simply reaching for obvi-ous options as a solution to the problem and wants it to adopt a “creative” approach.

If I Were You managing director Rob Clifford says he is concerned that borr-owers would have to shoul-der the cost of such schemes. He says: “The whole principle of Mig was greatly discredited because costs were effectively passed on to the consumer but most of the benefit was provided to the lender. That seemed fundamentally unfair.

“I would be supportive of some sort of insurance proposition that gave lenders the comfort they are seeking but we need to be very cautious about any model which seeks to pass on the cost directly to the consumer.”

Clifford says he is more supportive of top-up loans as a way of helping FTBs.

He says: “I am far more in favour of top-up or secon-dary lending solutions, where the borrower openly borrows from an alternative source for some or all of the deposit, but lenders need to be more comfortable with the lack of a personal stake from the borrower.”

Both Legal & General director of housing and external affairs Stephen Smith and Alexander Hall chief operating officer Andy Pratt do not see Mig solving the problem.

Smith says insurance firms should not be part of the decision process for approving a loan.

Pratt says Mig is an old-fashioned solution to a modern problem. He says: “The whole financial services world has moved on since Mig was created but it is encour-aging that the housing minister is calling for some sort of innovation to help first-time buyers.”

In Canada, it is a requirement for lenders to take out a Mig when lending above 80 per cent LTV. It is backed by the government, which provides a guarantee to the insurance company.

Pratt says such a scheme could be helpful in the UK but thinks it would be difficult to achieve.

Clifford says he would prefer to see the Government extending its key workers initiative, which helps people working in certain public sector jobs, such as nursing and teaching, to buy a home.

He says: “The criticism of that scheme has been that the qualification criteria has been far too onerous. So a big caveat I place on that suggestion is that it has to be widely available to FTBs.”

Recommended

1

Royal London sees 26% rise in new business

Royal London has reported a 26 per cent increase in new life and pensions business for 2010 from £2.5bn to £3.1bn. Scottish Life, Royal London’s asset management businesses including the Ascentric wrap, and Royal London 360°, Royal London’s international markets business, led the group’s performance. Scottish Life reported a 37 per cent rise in new […]

Ex-Skandia sales director Dave Chessell moving to Novia

Novia has appointed former Skandia UK sales director Dave Chessell as regional sales manager for London and the South-east. Chessell takes over from Paul Boston who will continue as Novia sales director. He left Skandia in October 2009 as part of the firm’s sales restructure. He says: “Smaller, more adaptable platforms such as Novia, that […]

Novia hires ex-Skandia UK sales director

Novia has appointed former Skandia UK sales director Dave Chessell as its regional sales manager for London and the South East. Chessell succeeds Paul Boston who will continue in his role as Novia sales director. He was made redundant by Skandia in October 2009 as part of its sales restructure. Chessell says: “Smaller, more adaptable […]

Choose life…

Sarah Scott  – Marketing Consultant, Royal London  This month sees the return of Renton, Sickboy, Begbie and Spud in the sequel to the film Trainspotting. Just over 20 years later, we return to see exactly how life treated the characters whose lifestyle was less than ideal back in 1996. Did they choose a job, choose […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The use of MIGs declined when the insurance companies wouldn’t provide cover against the irresponsible lending that lenders were introducing.
    If lenders were willing to return to responsible lending (which there is no sign of yet) then MIGs could return and the risk would be shared.
    It would also provide a helpful restaint on irresponsible lending as the insurance companies wouldn’t provide cover for it.

  2. MIGs died a death when mortgage lenders policies became so irresponsible that they were unable to get insurance companies to provide cover.
    If lenders were to re-introduce prudent lending policies then MIG would once again become an option, and a very useful one at that.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com