View more on these topics

The lure is an ass

The debate on savings policy often focuses on retirement provision and the so-called £27bn savings gap. But it is too simplistic to argue that, as people are not saving enough to enjoy retirement, they need to put more in their pensions.

Policymakers sometimes ignore more subtle factors that shape savings needs and habits. For many people, rainy-day saving should take priority over pensions.

Rainy day saving is important because it can help develop a savings culture. It gives people greater independence throughout their life and can enable them to cope better with change and improve their prospects later in life.

Governments of all colours have encouraged families to save for the medium term as well as for pensions. They have done this through a range of tax-efficient savings vehicles. The Tories started the ball rolling with Peps in 1986 and Tessas in 1991.

In 1999, New Labour introduced Isas. One of the aims of Isas was to encourage more people to save. The Government hoped that simplifying tax-efficient saving, extending the range of assets available and lowering the maximum investment limits (and later the age limits) would make Isas attractive to younger and less well-off people.

In 1997, Tony Blair outlined the aims of Isas: “For the first time, (lower and middle-income families) have got a tax-free account into which they can put their savings. It is about extending opportunity to save, not curtailing it. There is a choice. We can either spend the same amount of money on tax relief, giving these new six million people the chance to save, or we can carry on with the existing system.”

But have these aims been achieved? Forthcoming IPPR research compares the take-up of Isas in 2000/01 with that of their predecessors. Overall levels of tax-free account holding are higher with Isas than Peps and Tessas. However, more important is the question of whether poorer and younger households have been induced to save.

In short, they have not. Isas are no better at reaching lower-income savers than Peps and Tessas. Among the key group earning between £10,000 and £15,600, Isa holdings are only 1 per cent higher than was the case for Peps and Tessas. The income profile of savers is virtually identical to that of previous savings vehicles.

We see a similar story with age. Account holdings, in both 1997/98 and 2000/01, are lowest among the young and tail off again among older people.

A positive note is that Isas have brought a small increase in tax-free saving by young people between 16-34. At first glance, this appears welcome, yet dig a little deeper and most of these younger people are in high-income households.

In short, Isas have not achieved their aim. Tax relief still does not benefit the poor and there has been no substantial increase in tax-free account holding among a wider spread of the population.

If we are serious about ensuring that more younger and lower-income people accumulate financial assets, we must understand why Isas have only limited appeal. One reason is simply that many might not have the money to save. Yet there is a near universal desire among all income groups to save. There are other barriers.

One of these is financial exclusion. Many people are disengaged from mainstream banks, often managing their finances without even a current account, let alone any form of saving. Many save informally in jam jars or with friends and relatives but feel barred from mainstream savings opportunities. Measures need to be taken to reduce such exclusion.

Even if financial exclusion were reduced, Isas are likely to remain exclusive. The central problem is tax relief. The group who benefit most are higher-rate taxpayers. Basic-rate taxpayers benefit to some extent but those paying no tax do not benefit at all. What is more, tax relief is not cheap, amounting to £420m for Isas in 2000/01. It is questionable whether this money is spent in the most effective way.

Policymakers need to explore more effective incentives. We need to move beyond tax relief. The principle of matching saving has already been established by the savings gateway, where low-income savers will see their deposits matched pound for pound by the Government. Such a transparent incentive but at a less generous ratio could offer an option for reform of Isas.

Indeed, the Conservatives recently broached this subject. Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary David Willetts has recognised that incentives to save cannot be directed solely through the tax system. The Conservatives&#39 proposal for a lifetime savings account uses matching rather than tax relief. For every pound that an individual deposits in the account, the Government also makes a contribution. Because all people receive the incentive, regardless of their income, the policy could provide real encouragement for moderate and low-income earners to save.

Would it not be refreshing if the Government noted the value in Willetts&#39 idea and explored a similar policy that provided genuine incentives for more people to save?

Will Paxton is research fellow at the IPPR


R&SA admits it needed loans as payouts slide

Royal & Sun Alliance has revealed it called on contingent loans from its general insurance parent last year and in January to maintain regulatory solvency and admits some of its with-profits policies are not keeping pace with inflation. In its annual bonus declaration, the company slashed payouts on with-profits by up to 22 per cent. […]

Nationwide and Halifax making no immediate change to rates following BoE cut

The largest lenders including Halifax and Nationwide say they will monitor the reaction in the market to the Bank of England&#39s move to cut rates to 3.75 per cent before deciding on their next move. Both lenders say they will make decisions about their rates in due course, but The One Account, owned by Royal […]

Internal critic of FSA&#39s handling of Equitable Life debacle is retiring

Ronnie Baird, the author of the Baird Report, which accused the FSA of severe shortfalls over its handling of the Equitable Life debacle, is retiring from the regulator at the end of March. His damning report accused the FSA of failing to spot the issues that needed to be addressed or, having spotted them, failing […]

Repossessions are lowest for 20 years

Arrears and repossessions have fallen to their lowest levels for 20 years, with only 0.11 per cent of all borrowers repossessed by lenders last year, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders. Its latest figures reveal that 11,970 properties were repossessed last year compared with 18,280 in 2001. Only 50,510 mortgages were in arrears for […]

US equities: opportunities for short sellers expand

Optimism is as American as baseball and apple pie. And since the financial crisis, being optimistic about US equities has paid off: they have outperformed every other major developed market by a comfortable margin. Yet while there remain plenty of good reasons to be optimistic about US equities, Stephen Moore, manager of the Artemis US […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm