View more on these topics

The hard line on stakeholder

Thirty-four stakeholder sellers have rushed to make the starting line. The gun has been fired. Now what should they do?

What advice should they be offering to potential buyers? It is easy if the applicant is on a high income and wishes to buy stakeholder plans for his or her children. Similarly, there is no difficulty in selling to what will be one of the biggest groups purchasing stakeholder – non-workers. Accountants will fail their duty to higher earners if they do not ensure that non-working wives, husbands or partners have a stakeholder bought for them and thereby gain an additional 28p tax perk per pound contributed.

By a strange irony, the difficulties come when one of the Government&#39s stakeholder target group presents themselves as a customer. How is a company going to give sensible advice to a worker on, say, £14,000 a year and ensure they will not be open to a misselling charge further down the line?

Offering advice to the stakeholder target group would be difficult in any circumstances but the Government&#39s pension strategy has made that task infinitely more difficult.

Take the worker on £14,000. Can anyone with any confidence say this worker will be better off with a stakeholder than settling for membership of the state second pension?

The S2P is a good deal for the low paid – infinitely better than Serps which it replace – but it will be open to the same kind of political attack. It is unfunded. If the past is any guide, how long will the S2P survive unscathed?

Only sellers who believe the S2P will end up in the same knacker&#39s yard as Serps could confidently push stakeholder for workers towards the bottom half of the target group. How could you advise lower-paid workers earning above the £9,000 ceiling suggested by the Government for membership of the S2P even when the stockmarket was enjoying a 10-year boom?

During this Parliament, the Government introduced the minimum income guarantee and linked it to earnings. How many of the lower paid will be able to save enough to convert into an annuitised income which will be above the Mig level when they come to retire?

Again, sellers may judge that the Mig in its current form will not last. That is my view. But I do not sell stakeholder and it does not matter very much whether my guess is right or wrong. The judgement of sellers, however, is vital if they are not to mislead savers and thereby open themselves to a misselling charge.

Then again, how does the proposed pension credit fit into this scheme of things other than making the advice about buying stakeholder even more risky? Many people have picked up that the pension credit pays a bonus on top of a person&#39s savings. That is not quite right. What the credit will do is to compensate partially some savers for some of the loss of Mig income which results from their savings. Will sellers have time to explain that complication to potential stakeholder buyers?

As if this was not complicated enough, sellers will also be faced with workers in personal pensions who want to switch to stakeholder. But stakeholder charges are only a good deal for people who have not already paid up front for their personal pension. Once a substantial part of these personal pension charges have been paid, I would judge it doubtful that it would be beneficial to move to a stakeholder plan.

Pity the poor stakeholder seller. But pity is unlikely to go to those companies which have tried to steal a march on others over the past six months and have made the most extraordinary claims for their stakeholder products. My guess is that those ads will feature prominently should there be a stakeholder misselling scandal five years from now.


Halifax and Bank of Scotland plan £26bn merger

Halifax and Bank of Scotland are in talks over a possible £26bn merger to create a bank to rival the big four on the high street.Halifax, the UK&#39s biggest mortgage lender, confirmed last week the companies are negotiating a “merger of equals” although, at £17bn, Halifax is valued at around £7bn more than BoS.The banks […]

FSA backs down in tree-walk commission battle

The FSA has climbed down on its ban over IFAs being paid commission on stakeholder when life office representatives take IFA clients through decision trees.The move is a victory for Aifa and IFAs whose lobbying contributed to the FSA&#39s Regulatory Update 88 which confirms that IFAs will be paid for their advice even if life […]

Claims&#39 warning for IFAs joining In-Partnership

IFAs joining the IFA network In-Partnership could be leaving themselves and their estates liable to future professional negligence claims, warns a law firm.Armstrong Neal Financial says the In-Partnership contract that IFAs must sign before joining the network includes a clause entitled, Agreement to bind representatives. It states: “The provisions of this agreement shall be binding […]

Get out of the pocket of the providers

I refer to the letter published in Money Marketing entitled, Protection policy was not protected against helpline.The actions of Scottish Widows as described are totally unacceptable. However, Mr Steel&#39s criticism does appear bizarre, as he is prepared to fund both his business and lifestyle by the receipt of indemnity commission from the product provider he […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm