Concerns about the pensions guidance service being offered by Citizens Advice are mounting as exclusive data obtained by Money Marketing reveals that those who use The Pensions Advisory Service are more likely to shop around and seek regulated advice.
The Pension Wise guidance service was launched alongside the pension freedoms in April and comprises telephone support from TPAS and face-to-face guidance from Citizens Advice.
Since April, Pension Wise users have been asked to volunteer for an ‘exit survey’ that quizzes them on both their satisfaction with the service and what they plan to do next.
To date the Government has only reported satisfaction levels and has repeatedly blocked Money Marketing requests for information on the service, which is paid for through an industry levy. Advisers will contribute £4.7m of the £39.1m funding costs in 2015/16.
However, Money Marketing analysis of official Government figures obtained through the Freedom of Information act reveals exactly what savers intended to do after receiving guidance in the first six months of the freedoms.
The numbers show that Pension Wise customers who visit Citizens Advice are less likely to want regulated advice and less likely to shop around, while also being more likely to seek additional information from alternative sources.
So, is there a fundamental problem with the way Citizens Advice is guiding retirees? And what questions do the results raise about the future delivery of Pension Wise?
In surveys of more than 16,000 users conducted by both Citizens Advice and TPAS between April and the end of September, 38 per cent reported an intention to speak to an adviser following their guidance session.
Similarly, across both services, 29 per cent said they planned to shop around to seek a better deal from an alternative to their existing provider, while 41 per cent said they would seek more information.
However, the surveys also lay bare a significant disparity in the behaviour of those who receive guidance from the two organisations.
While almost half of TPAS customers expressed a desire to seek advice, just one in three Citizens Advice visitors said the same.
And while 40 per cent of TPAS users said they planned to shop around, the same was true of just 25 per cent of those who had a face-to-face session with Citizens Advice.
Citizens Advice users are also more likely to seek more information from an alternative source.
Barnett Waddingham senior consultant and former TPAS chief executive Malcolm McLean says the figures raise questions about the quality of the service being provided in the face-to-face sessions.
He says: “Are people asking questions that their Citizens Advice Bureau can’t answer? There has always been a worry as to the competence of Citizens Advice because they weren’t recruiting the same quality of guider as TPAS, and they weren’t even asking for pensions experience. My experience has always been that these people can ask you anything, so you need to be pretty well genned up, and the fact that people are saying they need to get more information somewhere else could be reflective of that.
“I find the shopping around point worrying too. On annuities, people really need to shop around to make sure that they get the best deal, and that’s even true for drawdown.”
Conservative MP Craig Mackinlay says he will lobby fellow Work and Pensions committee members to apply further scrutiny to the Government’s guidance guarantee in light of the findings.
He says: “We have already done some work on the pensions guidance and advice market, but we came at it from a different angle and we didn’t come up with this. It’s possible that the Citizens Advice service is not as fulsome and as all-encompassing as we’d like.”
Fellow committee member and pensions all-party parliamentary group chairman Richard Graham adds that quality of service remains difficult to assess.
He says: “Citizens Advice has hired some very good people, and I have done a mystery shop myself on TPAS and come away quite impressed.
“But I have recommended to [Work and Pensions committee chairman] Frank Field that committee members go to TPAS and listen in on the telephone calls so they get a sense of how deep the guidance is, and I have suggested we also look at the practicalities of doing something similar with Citizens Advice.”
Aviva head of financial research John Lawson argues that while different kinds of customers may be using each service, the Government and Citizens Advice should seek to analyse the discrepancies.
He says: “If I was in charge of that service I would certainly want to find out the reasons. It might be that they are serving different customers but we would certainly want to know why that is happening, because it might be that Citizens Advice could learn something from TPAS.”
Apfa director-general Chris Hannant agrees: “There’s probably a lesson to be learned in having a look at the people going through the different processes and whether they are getting comparable experiences.
“If you have similar cohorts going through either, and that is broadly consistent, you wouldn’t expect such a large divergence in outcomes.
“People need to get a consistent form of service and you would need to check that there is equal information on the benefits of financial advice whichever route you go down.”
A Citizens Advice spokeswoman says: “Thousands of people have had a Pension Wise appointment with Citizens Advice and the satisfaction survey shows people are really pleased with the high quality service they’ve received.
“What someone says they are going to do following a Pension Wise appointment bears no reflection on the quality of the service they have received.”
A Treasury spokesman adds: “Pension Wise has been a real success story, with over 1.8 million visits to the website and over 35,000 guidance appointments delivered since April.
“The guidance is delivered consistently across the service, whether it is over the phone, face-to face or through our website, and feedback has shown that satisfaction with both the service and guidance remains high.”
Although industry figures have welcomed that more than a third of people who take Pension Wise guidance say they plan to speak to a regulated adviser, they say the number who actually do so is likely to be lower.
Sesame Bankhall Group executive chairman John Cowan says: “I just don’t get the sense from talking to advisers there’s a whole lot of people beating a path to their doors.
“I suspect that while there’s a number of them who might plan to go and see an IFA, they later say ‘gosh, that seems like a lot of money’.
“The problem for advisers is that those people are only looking at one side of the equation and they are not seeing the benefits.”
Former shadow pensions minister Gregg McClymont, now head of retirement savings at Aberdeen Asset Management, says the figures indicate strong appetite for advice in the aftermath of pension freedoms. “The big challenge now is economic – how to provide advice at a price which savers will pay. Thus the Financial Advice Market Review has a huge responsibility on its shoulders to provide a solution.”
Despite the findings, Graham says the Government should not set explicit targets for a proportion of Pension Wise users to seek financial advice.
He says: “If 40-odd per cent of guidance users take advice, that’s a step in the right direction. But I don’t think it’s for the Government or the Work and Pensions committee to decide that. We should be more focused on the quality of the outcome.”
Robert Reid, managing director, Syndaxi Chartered Financial Planners
The figures reflect the fact people coming out of these sessions with Citizens Advice think they have just received advice. It’s less of a problem with TPAS because the people working within that organisation are well aware of the difference between advice and guidance. I’m less convinced that the same is true for the staff at Citizens Advice.
That doesn’t necessarily mean the service is of lower quality, but it does mean those people visiting Citizens Advice have a less clear position going forward.
Scott Gallacher, director, Rowley Turton
We are a relatively successful firm and get a reasonable number of non-referred clients, but we’ve only had two or three Citizens Advice enquiries in the last few years. The exit survey results are alarmingly different for both shopping around and seeing a regulated adviser. That definitely merits further investigation. It would be interesting to see what the differences are in the training, because TPAS seems to have a better understanding of who we are and what we do and that we are not some evil, commission-hungry sales people.
On the grounds that we are paying for it, it’s fair and reasonable that we get a better understanding of what is being said and why these differences exist.
More people who have been to Citizens Advice for Pension Wise guidance say they need to get more information.
Is that a reflection of the quality of the service at Citizens Advice? Are people asking questions that their CAB can’t answer?
There has always been a worry as to the competence of Citizens Advice because they were not recruiting the same quality of guider as TPAS, and they were not even asking for pensions experience.
My experience has always been that these people can ask you anything, so you need to be pretty well genned up, and the fact that people are saying they need to get more information somewhere else could be reflective of that.
The small numbers who say they are unsure are more worrying. If they have been through everything then the least you would expect is that they would know what options are attractive to them, and they should know what they could or should do.
Clearly, someone needs to be examining the quality of the service but at present there seems to be no indication as to whether that is being done.
The Government needs to make sure that people are being used properly and that they have the necessary skills and expertise to give the quality service that we all need to see.
Malcolm McLean is senior consultant at Barnett Waddingham