View more on these topics

Tenet’s Martin Greenwood: IFAs and restricted advisers can peacefully co-exist


Since independent and restricted were first announced as the new advice labels for the post-RDR world, they have been the subject of endless speculation, debate, confusion and disagreement.

Post-RDR, you may expect the debate to have subsided but it has merely shifted to focus on the type of investment service that will win the perceived battle in the advisory sector. Independence is continually pitched as “versus” restricted, as if in a modern-day gladiatorial battle.

Are we at war? If so, no one has told us here at Tenet where independent and restricted advisers co-exist peacefully. As far as we can tell, advisers are generally fed up with all the infighting and divisive comment around their choice of investment service, which seems to have overtaken the choice between being an appointed representative or directly authorised in terms of an issue to stir up dissent.

In truth, independent, restricted, DA and AR are all choices that advisers must make. We should be concerned with supporting advisers with the facts and services to make an educated choice rather than trying to argue that one is better than another. Unfortunately, that is a little boring for many in the industry who, often with their own commercial agendas, seek to perpetuate certain myths. 

Because we support all advisers, we have no such drum to bang and can concentrate on education, development and support.

There are undeniably pros and cons to being independent or restricted, which need to be reviewed in an unemotional manner to enable advisers to make sound business decisions. Certain clients do value and specifically seek out independent advice, others may require it due to their investment needs and objectives. Consumer groups generally promote independence as the best route for advice. 

But the obligation to provide whole of market research for retail investment products can be time-consu-ming without enhanced research and support capab-ilities. For a one-man DA firm, independence could be very difficult to retain. 

Time invested should also be reflected in the adviser charge so IFAs need to ensure they can explain the value of their expertise and proposition.

Some advisers lack the desire or capabilities to advise on a broader range of products.For them, the restricted route offers a more comfortable option. Some variants of a restricted model may also offer process efficiencies, or even commercial advantages, and we have seen many recent examples of distribution groups finding a restricted proposition commercially attractive. Advisers need to consider whether that is suitable for their clients.

Firms can, of course, offer a hybrid model of both independent and restricted advice – as long as they can demonstrate competence in respect of independent financial advice and  maintain separate initial disclosure documentation to reflect each service proposition offered to clients. This is becoming increasingly common and is proof that the different advice labels can be complementary.

Recent research for the FCA suggests there is almost no understanding among consumers about what is meant by independent and restricted advice. It could be argued that if there is a battle to fight, this is where we should concentrate our efforts.

Martin Greenwood is chief executive of Tenet Group



Should the state pension be means-tested?

Prime Minister David Cameron kicked off this year’s electioneering with a pledge to keep the triple lock on pensions until 2020. Cameron is guaranteeing the state pension will rise in line with earnings, inflation or 2.5 per cent whichever is highest. The state pension is a universal benefit so the generous pledge will apply to […]


Falling foul of residence tax rules Neil Dickey The recent First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Rumbelow v HMRC concerned the taxpayers’ liability to UK capital gains tax (CGT), during a period in which they claimed to be non-UK resident. Until April 2001, Mr and Mrs Rumbelow had lived in the UK, where they had […]


Steve Webb: Why I’m poking the annuity market with a ‘big sharp stick’

Pensions minister Steve Webb has questioned the value for money offered by insurers and non-advised brokers as he continues his assault on the annuity market. The Liberal Democrat MP caused a storm over the weekend when he suggested people should be able to switch annuity provider if they can get a better deal elsewhere. The […]


Tory MP: Govt should create Nest-style annuity provider

Conservative MP David Mowat has called on the Government to create a Nest-style body to compete with annuity providers. Policymakers are coming under growing pressure to address perceived failings in the annuity market, with an FCA review of annuity profit levels due to be published next month. Speaking during a debate on annuity reform in […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Of course we can peacefully co-exist. That isn’t the issue. The issue is that the division, the distinction. is clearly laid out and disclosed and identified so that the public are in no doubt whatsoever.

    This is not happening and why many of us independents have the hump’.

  2. I agree with Harry yet again.

    Certain vertically integrated firms are abusing the separation RDR was supposed to achieve between advice costs and product costs and appear to be getting away with it with the FCA, which stinks.

  3. My very great friend in Rome 11th January 2014 at 12:33 pm

    A large proportion of Tenet’s membership, of whatever stripe, are not at war with each other (why should they be?). They’re at war with Tenet, which is why Tenet refuses to disclose just how many resignations it’s received over the past 12 months, claiming only that its “numbers are holding fairly steady”. But that’s not the same thing, is it?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm