View more on these topics

Take a long look

As both the Government and the FSA trundle the winding paths towards their very own elephant graveyards, one has to wonder at the bare-faced cheek of an organisation which seeks to defend the indefensible and continues to prop up the rotting struts supporting the disintegrating edifice.

Maybe I am being overly generous, quite possibly it is a mirage of cheek masking a desperation born of fear, the fear of being revealed, the fear of being outed like some Parliamentary scrounger.

I am referring to the Treasury and specifically to Lord Myners’ lame response to the joint committee on human rights.

Unconvincingly, he attempts to legitimise base actions by likening the Financial Ombudsman Service’s rejection of the 15-year long stop to the conventions within which the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) operates.

Perhaps an apt analogy is of an exposed MP pointing to his opposition equivalent on the benches and shouting: “He’s at it as well…I think.”

Myners’ correlation is feeble and demands inspection. Unlike the FOS, the LSO cannot investigate the firm being complained about, it can only review the way in which one of the six legal professional bodies has investigated such a complaint and only within three months of the final decision letter. Even then, it can only recommend payment of compensation.

The legal professional bodies also work within carefully defined parameters. The Bar Standards Board investigates complaints against barristers and its rules stipulate that a complaint must be lodged within six months of the event being complained of, unless the Complaints Commissioners believe the complaint to be serious enough to have the time limit set aside.

The Legal Complaints Service (LCS), which investigates solicitors, also stipulates a six-month window for complaints.

There is one strategic difference between these bodies and the FOS. While both bodies, and also the Lay Observer for Northern Ireland, are able to investigate poor service, they all refuse to deal with complaints concerning professional negligence. These have to be taken via the courts, therefore, the 15-year long stop is automatically in play. When it scrutinises complaints against firms, the FOS investigates the entire works – negligence within the advice or product selection process as well as poor service.

While the FOS can award compensation up to £100,000, the maximum sum, the BSB can award is £5,000 for pre-July 2008 cases and £15,000 thereafter and this £15,000 figure aligns them with the LCS.

The Institute of Legal Executives is limited to £3,000 while another body, the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, has no power to levy fines and its ultimate sanction is suspension of membership.

Lord Myners seeks to emphasise that the Treasury is not sure how the FOS compares with other ombudsman bodies.

Given the potentially ruinous impact of FOS decisions, one suggests that he should be aware (or ought reasonably to have become aware) before drafting his response.

Recommended

Aegon looks at platform move

Aegon has hired former UBS Wealth Management executive director Tim O’Connor to sound out a potential launch into the wrap market.

Julius Baer to list Artio Global Investors

Julius Baer plans to list Artio Global Investors, a subsidiary formerly known as Julius Baer Americas, on the New York Stock Exchange later this year, depending on market conditions.The Zurich-based group recently separated its private bank and asset management divisions, resulting in two distinct, independent companies. Julius Baers GAM Holding division comprises GAM, Artio Global […]

Bank on simple policy

I have read a few interesting articles recently that set me thinking. The first that caught my eye was an entertaining piece by Steve Bee. He is really into Twitter and particularly likes its central attribute – that posts (or tweets) have to be kept to a maximum of 140 characters (not words). He went further and suggested, somewhat tongue in cheek, that pension legislation should be kept to 140 characters.

Vote of confidence

While it is too early to say whether or not the markets are on their way up in the long term, there is some good news for the fund industry.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. long stop
    So, IFAs will continue to have their human rights abused in a so called democracy, where the rule of law should take priority over the arbitrary whims of an ombudsman who “unashamedly makes the law” I think we need Joanna Lumley to state our case. Joking aside Alan , on behalf of downtrodden, tired and weary of it all IFAs everywhere ,thanksfor doing a great job of fighting our case, together with other people like Evan Owen. Wake up IFas & send Evan some money so he can continue. He is like David against Goliath. The least we can do is support him.

Leave a comment