View more on these topics

Surveyors value verdict

A High Court judge’s decision in a contributory negligence case between GMAC-RFC and Countrywide Surveyors could ease pressure on a fragile surveying sector.

GMAC-RFC started proceedings against Countrywide in 2008, alleging overvaluation of a property on which it lent in 2004. Countrywide valued the property at £185,000 and in 2007 the applicant defaulted and GMAC-RFC repossessed the property.

It was eventually sold for £123,500 in September 2008, with the net proceeds of the sale being £118,103. GMAC-RFC argued that Countrywide had negligently overvalued the property, which it valued at £154,000. Countrywide, in turn, made allegations of contributory negligence against GMAC-RFC, alleging lax lending policies.

In December, judge Keyser ruled Countrywide had not been negligent. He added that even if Countrywide had been found negligent, he would have judged GMAC-RFC as contributory negligent for not conducting proper checks on affordability and income. If that happened, the judge said he would have deducted 60 per cent of any money awarded to GMAC-RFC.

Countrywide says it had made a provision of £11.9m in 2010 to guard against claims by lenders and it was “not surprised” with the judge’s verdict.

GMAC-RFC, which now trades as Paratus AMC, said it did “not accept” the judge’s decision.

Contributory negligence cases rarely make it to the courtroom, with both parties usually settling out of court but the surveying sector will welcome this ruling.
Surveyors believe the finding in favour of surveyors will put off some lenders from making speculative claims of negligence.

London’s Surveyors director Simon White says: “It will send shockwaves to a lot of the lenders who over the years have had an exceptionally gung-ho approach to lending. They will be thinking to them-selves they should have done some due diligence and not just lend to anybody and they should pay the consequences if the property gets repossessed.”

E.surv director Richard Sexton says: “If a valuer makes a mistake and is proved to have done so, then that is what the professional indemnity insurance policy is for. All valuers have had claims over the last few years and it is also true a lot of the claims have come from the sub-prime sector because they are the ones most likely to be repossessed.

“This will make lenders be more cautious about issuing claims for the sake of issuing claims.”

Sub-prime borrowers, by nature, are more prone to defaulting or falling into arrears than mainstream borrowers, so it is likely that many more people who took out sub-prime mortgages before 2007 will be repossessed.

But some specialist lenders could look to other people involved in the housing transaction in a bid to claw back losses.

Goldsmith Williams partner Eddie Goldsmith fears solicitors could be targeted. He says: “The court seems to have effectively made a commonsense decision here. If the litigation over the repossessions involves lawyers, then I hope this does not mean lenders go after solicitors instead because they can no longer go after surveyors.”

Professional indemnity insurance is a big drain on surveyor firms’ resources, as policies tend to be very expensive due to the high-risk nature of valuations.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors has been working on tackling problems in the “dysfunctional” PI market. It says structural problems in this sector mean claims have a “significant” and disproportionate effect on premiums.

It says: “This can only be good news as it recognises that loss and liability are the responsibility of all parties involved, not just the valuer. RICS has been concerned with issues over risk and pricing in the market, which is why we are currently running a consultation on professional indemnity insurance.”

In November, surveyors told Money Marketing a problem with attracting and retaining new blood in the sector could result in demand for valuers outstripping supply, which will hit service levels and turn-round times in housing sales.

Sexton says the cost of PI is having a similar effect but he is confident PI premiums will fall as a result of the ruling and the expected fall in speculative claims made against surveyors.

He says: “I am sure the cost of PI cover and the cost of claims would be a very strong disincentive for someone wanting to set up a surveying firm today. We are not that far away from a shortage of supply of valuation firms.

“As a valuer, you pay a premium which relates to your back record, so insurers are always looking for firms with the best PI records. If you have fewer claims, the cost of your cover goes down.”

But White points out the number of PI providers has fallen and it is likely these providers will insure both lenders and surveyors.

He says: “PI has been rising steadily over the past few years. I see no prospect whatsoever of the main PI providers saying, ’Oh well, if we can go for the lender we can reduce the surveyor’s PI’ because, of course, the very same providers provide PI to the lenders as well.”


Software firms pledge to meet deadline

Software companies designing products to help firms comply with auto-enrolment rules have told The Pensions Regulator they will be ready for the start of the scheme later this year. In December, TPR executive director for employer compliance Charles Counsell wrote an open letter to software companies, warning that although some employers had started looking for […]


FSA fines Direct Line and Churchill £2.2m

The FSA has fined Direct Line Insurance and Churchill Insurance Company Limited £2.2m for failing to prevent files requested by the regulator from being “improperly altered”.   The regulator says during the collation of 50 complaint files requested by the FSA for review, 27 were altered improperly before they were submitted to the regulator. However […]


British MEPs stay at top of Econ committee

The European parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee has voted to keep two British MEPs at the top of the team which helps shape financial regulation emerging from Europe. Liberal Democrat Sharon Bowles (pictured) will serve another two and a half years as chair of the econ committee, while Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy will stay […]

Bonds going bust? Not so fast….

In recent months bond bears have been reinvigorated, and market commentary suggesting “the end of the bond (bull) market is near” has become commonplace. We think these comments are premature. Explaining the global government bond sell-off October has seen renewed pressure on global government bonds, initially provoked by a Bloomberg article suggesting that the ECB […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm