View more on these topics

Structured product providers warned against ‘pushing products’ on advisers

The FSA has told structured product providers their adviser training sessions should not be about “pushing products” but instead should educate advisers about how products work and highlight the risks posed.

The regulator has published its final guidance on structured products, following a guidance consultation in November.

Between November 2010 and May 2011 the FSA carried out a review of seven major structured product providers, which found weaknesses in the way providers design and approve structured products.

The FSA found providers were assessing their distribution channels based on sales volumes rather than treating customers fairly, and that most providers could not explain when they would stop using a particular distribution channel.

In the final guidance, the regulator says providers should take “particular care” in using non-advised channels where products have complicated features that are difficult to explain to consumers.

It also reminds providers to carry out initial due diligence on their distributors and ongoing reviews and analysis of unexpected spikes in sales to ensure products are reaching the target market.

Providers should also consider how they pay in-house sales forces and whether the reward arrangements increase the risk of misselling.

The FSA says providers need to offer sufficiently detailed information to advisers on how structured products are set up, implicit charges and the market conditions needed for certain returns.

Likely training needs and other support for advisers also need to be assessed.

The FSA says: “Training is a powerful tool in helping distributors to understand products. The primary purpose of training should be educational and it should not be used as a marketing tool, or product ‘push’.

“The content of training presentations should be sufficient, appropriate and comprehensible and should not diminish the risks of a particular product by focusing on features that are designed to offer protection.”

Recommended

Clydesdale and Yorkshire to only use Law Society-accredited firms

Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks are restricting their conveyancing panels to firms accredited by The Law Society’s conveyancing quality scheme. It will also accept business from firms which are already on its approved panel for undertaking business lending work. The new arrangements for England and Wales will apply to all applications received on or after April […]

Borrowers caught in a trap

Mortgage advisers are warning that tighter interest-only criteria will trap hundreds of thousands of borrowers and leave them unable to remortgage. This week, Nationwide Building Society cut its maximum loan-to-value ratio for interest-only lending from 75 per cent to 50 per cent. Santander cut its interest-only LTV from 75 per cent to 50 per cent […]

Rate of change

Despite the distinct scent of spring in the air, the broker community has taken some body blows these last few weeks. Many favoured lenders have adjusted criteria in ways that in certain instances make little sense, dual-pricing has made a comeback and the fiasco surrounding the “funds booking” of one particular lender has reduced grown […]

2

Pension firms accuse Nest of stepping outside remit

Two major pension providers have accused Nest of stepping outside its official remit to compete for business from big employers. Nest was established as part of the Government’s automatic enrolment reforms because private providers were unable to profitably service small employers. It is the only scheme which has a public service obligation to accept any […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Do we all dispair of the FSA? At what stage does education become marketing/pushing and why just structured products again?

    My pensions are rubbish but I dont suppose that is of any concern to them?

Leave a comment