View more on these topics

Steve Webb admits Govt should have banned consultancy charging earlier

Pensions minister Steve Webb says the Government should have acted to ban consultancy charging two years ago and admitted it was late to clampdown on charges ahead of auto-enrolment.

Speaking at a Standard Life fringe event on pensions at the Liberal Democrat conference in Glasgow today, Webb said he was “gobsmacked” at the lack of a quality standard on schemes that were set for auto-enrolment when he came to office in 2010.

Last week, the Government banned consultancy charging and said it was considering a retrospective ban on existing schemes.

Responding to a question from Money Marketing on whether he was planning any further retrospective action, Webb said he will consult on a charges cap in the autumn.

He said: “We don’t want someone auto-enrolled into a scheme where a huge slug of money goes on charges. We are still consulting on exactly how we deliver it and will consult on a cap on charges in the autumn. It would mean you can choose an auto-enrolment scheme but can only charge such a per cent. We need to move fast on it.

“The OFT has a study on workplace pensions out this week and once they publish we will consult on those things. For most of the providers you go to it won’t be an issue as we are trying to deal with the extremes. Should we have done this two years ago? Yes, I was gobsmacked when I took office in 2010 to discover there were almost no quality standards on auto-enrolment schemes.”

Webb said consultancy charging is not in the “spirit of auto-enrolment” and he wants more transparent charging for advice.

He said: “Taking money out of people’s pots didn’t seem right to us. We wanted to make consultancy charging transparent so firms can absolutely pay for advice if they have the money and want to do so but it is a direct transaction between employer and consultant.

”We think it will improve the reputation of the sector. Some providers weren’t doing it at all, others stopped as soon as we started looking at it and a few kicked and screamed until we stopped them.”



Axa Wealth launches flexible drawdown offering

Axa Wealth has introduced flexible drawdown to the Retirement Wealth Account, its main Sipp account, more than two years after the Government introduced the new regime. Flexible drawdown has been available as an option to savers with more than £20,000 in secure retirement income since 6 April 2011. Savers who use flexible drawdown are able […]


Local talent lifts Scotland’s financial services industry to recovery

The financial services industry in Scotland is showing signs of recovery, with permanent vacancies up by 34 per cent this year. According to Change Recruitment’s Financial Services 2013 Salary Survey, the jobs market over the last six months shows that activity by firms hiring across the board for financial services is strongly up this year. […]


Japan is going for gold with its economic reforms

Last week, Japan was unveiled as the venue for the 2020 Olympic Games and the announcement is the latest instalment in the ongoing good news story of Japanese economic recovery. But will Japanese economic recovery be capable of lasting the distance? The news that Tokyo is to be the Olympic venue helped to push the […]

Jelf flexible benefits

In Focus: How to choose a flexible benefits provider — seven top tips

Jelf Employee Benefits looks at some of the key considerations employers should think about when reviewing and choosing a flexible benefits provider. Choosing the right benefits for your employees is one thing but delivering a successful employee benefits strategy is about understanding the complete picture and delivering it in a personalised way so that it resonates with each and every individual in your business. 


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “Taking money out of people’s pots didn’t seem right to us.” I see so financial services legislation is devised purely by “feelings” is it?

    Claiming that consultancy charges should have been banned two years earlier would suggest that the case for banning them is proven. It isn’t. Or if it has been, I’d be fascinated to seem some, any evidence.

  2. The curse of nanny state micro-management seems to be growing exponentially. There is no proven detriment to provider-facilitated adviser charging. Just add it to the gross contribution rate/s and everything’s made easier for the employer and the adviser, no faffing about with invoices and separate employer payments. A colleague recently expressed the opinion that because the government keeps buggering about with the rules, it’s become almost impossible to advise employers. Whatever happened to free market economics? Why deny employers the freedom to choose their own scheme and the mechanism by which they pay for consultancy services? I’m very glad to be having nothing at all to do with AE schemes.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm