View more on these topics

Steve Bee: We have a unique chance to revolutionise pensions

The recent Budget announcement that we will soon see an end to the way means-tested support for the elderly and the effect of diminishing the value of pension savings means we are now, I think, heading for a new pension future.

The Budget came with headlines screaming about the “granny tax” imposed by the freezing of allowances until allowances for all taxpayers catch up. The headline-writers largely ignored, though, the ending of a very real granny tax that has seen many pensioners lose up to 40 per cent of the real value of their pension savings and some even losing as much as 100 per cent. Losing 40 per cent or 100 per cent of the value of your savings is not much of an incentive for people to save and would have made the 13 million people about to be auto-enrolled into pension saving later this year think about whether it would be sensible to remain in the schemes they are about to be auto-enrolled into.

That is the trouble with the new pension reforms – it will be a requirement that all eligible employees are put into pension schemes by their employers but it will not be a requirement they stay in them. All employees who are auto-enrolled will have the option of opting out. If auto-enrolment had gone ahead with the present disincentives caused by the mass means-testing of support we have grown used to lately, the reforms would have ended in disaster.

The Government has shown it understands this issue and has taken the bold step of announcing that we will at last have a decent subsistence level of basic state pension for all. I think that is great.

With the means-testing problem solved at last, the new reforms now have a decent chance of succeeding but that does not mean they will.

IFAs have a role in ensuring the success of these important reforms. We are about to witness the birth of about 1.2 million new pension schemes over the next five years. That enormous number of schemes will become the bedrock of pension savings for about half the present workforce and generations of future pensioners will have their future living standards completely dependent on the value of the pensions these new private sector pension schemes deliver.

The legislation requires a minimum contribution of 3 per cent of the band of qualifying earnings to be made for employees by employers. That should be seen as a good base level, a good start if you like, but it should not become accepted as the benchmark for good contribution levels from employers. We have a once-in-a-generation chance here to work with employers and their employees to build the kind of pension schemes 21st Century pensioners will need. Let’s hope we are up to the task.

Steve Bee is managing partner at Paradigm Pensions

Recommended

1

Labour warns over credit rating agency rules

Shadow Treasury financial secretary Chris Leslie is warning new regulation intended to reduce reliance on credit ratings agencies could fortify the position of the big three agencies unless more firms enter the market. European Commission proposals for the new rules known as Credit Rating Agencies 3 include requirements for firms to rotate the agencies they […]

PSigma chief Chimes looks to bolster range

PSigma Asset Management managing director Ian Chimes says he would like to launch three or four more funds in the next three years. Chimes (pictured) says the new funds are likely to focus on the UK or global markets. He says: “There are different options to take advantage of. We could do a different blend […]

1

HMRC-approved Guernsey Qrops fall by 300 following clamp down

The number of Guernsey-based Qrops providers on HM Revenue & Custom’s approved list has fallen from around 300 in March to just three in April. The fall follows a clamp down by the Revenue on overseas pension schemes which treat residents differently from non-residents for tax purposes. HMRC’s final Qrops rules, published last month, require […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The vast majority of ordinary people aren’t remotely aware of the now apparently solved issue of means testing of State Benefits against private retirement income. All they know is that at the end of the day, they’ll be forced to buy an annuity or, if their fund is big enough to use some other retirement income product, the level of that income will still be governed by GAD rates.

    A very few may be aware that the days of being able to draw at retirement 25% of their fund as a tax free lump sum are probably numbered ~ why else would the government have renamed it PCLS?

    Is it surprising that virtually nobody except HNW people would consider paying a fee for advice on a long term retirement savings strategy. How many new PP’s are being taken out any more? I haven’t done one for years.

    If the government is unwilling or unable to come up with a solution to the problem of enduringly dire annuity rates, why doesn’t it create a special class of extra high yield gilts that’ll be available only to annuity funds?

    It’s not as if the government isn’t already plundering pension funds to the tune of £5Bn+ every year or that higher pensions won’t mean higher income tax receipts, is it?

    Honestly, these (government) assholes couldn’t organise the financing of a girl guides’ tea party. Can’t you see that Steve?

Leave a comment