View more on these topics

Steve Bee: How the UK lost its pensions mojo

A few decades ago, it was not at all unusual for ordinary workers in the UK to have a defined benefit pension scheme provided by their employer.

That has all changed now, of course. Very few employers now offer DB schemes to new workers and the schemes we do have, in the private sector at least, are becoming more anachronistic as time goes on.

Perversely, just as our golden age of widespread DB provision appears to be coming to an end, the real power of those arrangements has been highlighted by pension freedoms.

People have only now started to wake up to the fact a good pension costs what most of us would regard as an absolute fortune to buy.

The annual costs for an employer to provide DB pensions based on a 60th of an employee’s salary at or near retirement for each year of pensionable service were significant. Such a scheme would have cost something like 20 to 25 per cent of payroll every year.

Steve Bee: Hammond ignores Waspi women again

While most private sector employees would have had to meet some of the cost of the pension themselves, their contribution rate would have rarely been greater than 5 or 6 per cent of salary. The lion’s share of the cost – and all the risks – were borne by employers.

Such costs and risks are no longer deemed sensible to employers and I doubt people are surprised to hear that many are now opting to provide pensions on a defined contribution basis instead, meaning they get control of the costs and do not bear any of the risks previously associated with pension provision.

But at the same time, employers have also dramatically reduced the amount of money they are prepared to commit to their employees’ pensions. This is something that will impact generations of future pensioners.

There is nothing wrong with employers reducing their commitments to deferred income for employees. Most would probably prefer higher take-home pay to higher levels of deferred pay anyway. But that is not the point.

Adrian Boulding: State pension age equalisation is far from equal

What is important is that employers and employees alike try to understand the lessons that come from pension freedoms.

Twenty per cent of payroll paid into a pension pot year on year is the equivalent of saving one pound in every five earned over an entire working life. Very few people do that voluntarily. Yet, once upon a time, millions of ordinary people did just that.

Something fundamental has changed and the UK is going to struggle to find its pension mojo once more. Perhaps it never will.

Steve Bee is director at Jargonfree Benefits

Recommended

John Lawson: The major pension themes for 2019

Brexit will no doubt consume the government next year, but do not presume that means pensions will be left untouched When I think of how the pensions landscape has changed so dramatically over the past decade, 2018 was a relatively quiet year, thanks to large sections of the government having their hands full with Brexit. […]

Rules on mandatory ESG integration proposed for advice

The European Commission has published draft rules on how to incorporate environmental, social and governance preferences into investment advice. The proposed regulations seeks to make integration of clients’ ESG preferences mandatory for those providing investment advice. The European Commission first revealed its intention to make it mandatory to inquire about the clients ESG preferences in March […]

1

Scale of DB transfers by folded firms revealed

New data has shed light on how many defined benefit pension transfers have been conducted by advice firms that have since left the market. Nineteen firms have either had their permissions to conduct DB transfer advice removed by the FCA or have surrendered their authorisations since 2015. According to the Financial Times, these have been […]

Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund: positioning and outlook

Managers James Foster and Jacob de Tusch-Lec outline the fund’s investment approach and discuss current investment themes and outlook for the bond and equity markets. As James and Jacob confirm, the Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund’s aim is to generate an income from both equities and bonds. They explain their investment approach in each asset class, the sectors where they are […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Yes, Steve. The main reason is Regulation and Government fiddling.

  2. Steve If the DB fund is in equites the figure to achieve 2/3 final salary is 14%
    Mark Tennant

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com